SAGI is a novel causal language model that integrates swarm intelligence dynamics with transformer architecture. The model treats cognition as a dynamic, adaptive system where multiple internal "agents" collaborate through differentiable routing, trust mechanisms, and shared memory.

Model Description

Property	Value
Parameters	52.72M
Architecture	Transformer Decoder + Swarm Dynamics
Hidden Size	512
Layers	6
Attention Heads	8
Context Length	2048
Vocabulary	GPT-2 tokenizer (50,257 tokens)

Key Innovations

Differentiable Routing: Continuous mixture-of-experts via attention (DiffRouter) instead of hard module selection
Adaptive Gating & Trust: MetaController activates capacity under resource constraints; trust dynamics bias reliable components
Episodic + Semantic Memory: Dual memory system with trainable retrieval utility
Curiosity Engine: Injects novel goals when surprise is low, promoting exploration
Self-Model & Rollback: Predicts state transitions and detects anomalies for self-correction
Resource Dynamics: Soft conservation with learned converter; cognition consumes/recovers compute, memory, energy
Value Monitoring: Tracks alignment to core values and freezes plasticity under drift

How It Works

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                       SAGI Model                         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ┌─────────────────┐      ┌─────────────────────────┐   │
│  │   Swarm-7 V2.2  │─────▶│  Swarm State S, T       │   │
│  │  (Cognitive     │      │  (Working Memory)       │   │
│  │   Dynamics)     │      └───────────┬─────────────┘   │
│  └────────▲────────┘                  │                 │
│           │                           ▼                 │
│           │              ┌─────────────────────────┐    │
│           │              │  Transformer Decoder    │    │
│           │              │  - Swarm-conditioned    │    │
│           │              │    attention & FFN      │    │
│           │              │  - RoPE embeddings      │    │
│           │              └───────────┬─────────────┘    │
│           │                          │                  │
│  ┌────────┴────────┐      ┌─────────────────────────┐   │
│  │   Observation   │◀─────│      LM Head            │   │
│  │   (from tokens) │      └─────────────────────────┘   │
│  └─────────────────┘                                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The swarm processes observations derived from token embeddings, updating its internal state S. This state conditions the transformer's attention patterns and feed-forward activations via learned projections, creating bidirectional information flow between symbolic (tokens) and subsymbolic (swarm dynamics) processing.

Usage

Installation

pip install torch transformers datasets

Quick Start

python

from transformers import AutoTokenizer
from transformers import  AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoConfig

# Load model and tokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("reaperdoesntknow/SAGI")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("reaperdoesntknow/SAGI")

# Generate text
model.eval()

prompt = "Once upon a time"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")

outputs = model.generate(
    **inputs,
    max_new_tokens=100,
    temperature=0.8,
    top_k=50,
    top_p=0.9,
    do_sample=True,
    pad_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id,
)

print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True))

Model Architecture Details

Swarm Configuration

Parameter	Value	Description
`max_agents`	20	Number of internal cognitive agents
`dim_s`	64	State dimension
`dim_t`	32	Task/goal dimension
`dim_obs`	48	Observation dimension
`topk_route`	5	Sparse routing top-k
`K_thought_max`	5	Maximum thinking iterations per step

Resource Budgets

Resource	Budget	Description
Compute	60.0	Compute budget per step
Memory	20.0	Memory capacity
Energy	25.0	Energy budget

Trust & Plasticity

Trust Learning Rate: 0.07
Fast EMA (Plasticity): 0.10
Slow EMA (Consolidation): 0.002
Core Values: ["truth", "safety", "efficiency"]

Limitations

Early Research Model: This is an experimental architecture exploring swarm-transformer integration
Training Data: Currently trained on TinyStories subset; may produce simple, story-like outputs
Compute Requirements: Swarm dynamics add overhead compared to standard transformers
Generation Quality: Model is undertrained; outputs may be repetitive or incoherent

Intended Use

This model is intended for:

Research into multi-agent cognitive architectures
Exploration of dynamic, adaptive language models
Educational purposes in understanding swarm intelligence + LLMs

Not intended for:

Production applications
Safety-critical systems
Generation of factual content

Training Details

Dataset: TinyStories (subset)
Optimizer: AdamW (lr=3e-4, betas=(0.9, 0.999), weight_decay=0.01)
Scheduler: Cosine annealing
Precision: FP32
Hardware: CPU training (compatible with CUDA)

Citation

bibtex

@software{sagi2026,
  title={SAGI: Swarm AGI Language Model},
  author={Reaperdoesntknow},
  year={2026},
  url={https://huggingface.co/your-reaperdoesntknow/SAGI}
}

Convergent Intelligence Portfolio

Part of the Standalone Models by Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division

Mathematical Foundations: Discrepancy Calculus (DISC)

SAGI's swarm intelligence dynamics connect to Discrepancy Calculus through Discrepancy Mechanics (Ch. 16 of the DISC monograph) — a reformulation of dynamics that replaces Newton/Lagrange with four discrepancy laws:

DL0 (Co-Motion): Agent kinematics via metric derivative and environment flow
DL1 (Discrepancy Energy): $E_{\text{disc}}[f] = \frac{1}{2}\int w(x)(Df(x))^2 d\mu(x)$ — stability through bounded discrepancy energy
DL2 (Force as Discrepancy Gradient): Trust routing gradients as Euler-Lagrange from discrepancy action
DL3 (Reciprocity): Symplectic invariance preserved across agent interactions

The discrepancy operator $Df(x) = \lim_{\varepsilon \downarrow 0} \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \int_x^{x+\varepsilon} \frac{|f(t) - f(x)|}{|t - x|} dt$ quantifies the local mismatch in each agent's contribution. The trust mechanism between agents is operationally a discrepancy energy minimization: agents whose outputs have high mutual discrepancy are weighted down; agents converging on shared structure are amplified.

Classical mechanics is recovered as a degenerate smooth limit of Discrepancy Mechanics — just as standard single-head attention is a degenerate limit of swarm routing.

Full theory: "On the Formal Analysis of Discrepancy Calculus" (CIx, 2026; Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division).

Related Models

Model	Downloads	Format
SMOLM2Prover	56	HF
SMOLM2Prover-GGUF	150	GGUF
DeepReasoning_1R	16	HF
S-AGI	0	HF

Top Models from Our Lab

Model	Downloads
Qwen3-1.7B-Thinking-Distil	501
LFM2.5-1.2B-Distilled-SFT	342
Qwen3-1.7B-Coder-Distilled-SFT	302
Qwen3-0.6B-Distilled-30B-A3B-Thinking-SFT-GGUF	203
Qwen3-1.7B-Coder-Distilled-SFT-GGUF	194

Total Portfolio: 49 models, 22,598 total downloads

Last updated: 2026-03-28 12:58 UTC

From the Convergent Intelligence Portfolio

DistilQwen Collection — Our only BF16 series. Proof-weighted distillation from Qwen3-30B-A3B → 1.7B and 0.6B on H100. Three teacher variants (Instruct, Thinking, Coder), nine models, 2,788 combined downloads. The rest of the portfolio proves structure beats scale on CPU. This collection shows what happens when you give the methodology real hardware.

Top model: Qwen3-1.7B-Coder-Distilled-SFT — 508 downloads

Full methodology: Structure Over Scale (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8165)

Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division

Discrepancy Calculus Foundation

This model is part of the Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division portfolio. All models in this portfolio are developed under the Discrepancy Calculus (DISC) framework — a measure-theoretic approach to understanding and controlling the gap between what a model should produce and what it actually produces.

DISC treats training singularities (loss plateaus, mode collapse, catastrophic forgetting) not as failures to be smoothed over, but as structural signals that reveal the geometry of the learning problem. Key concepts:

Discrepancy Operator (D): Measures the gap between expected and observed behavior at each training step
Jump Sets: Boundaries where model behavior changes discontinuously — these are features, not bugs
Ghost Imprinting: Teacher knowledge that transfers to student models through weight-space topology rather than explicit distillation signal

For the full mathematical treatment, see Discrepancy Calculus: Foundations and Core Theory (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8194).

Citation chain: Structure Over Scale (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8165) → Three Teachers to Dual Cognition (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8184) → Discrepancy Calculus (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8194)