PromptCoT: Synthesizing Olympiad-Level Problems for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models
Highlights
✨ The Missing Piece for Test-Time Scaling
A lightweight yet powerful problem generation model that enables the construction of prompt sets at any scale with sufficient quality—perfect for initializing your post-training project, whether it's Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Reinforcement Learning (RL). Say goodbye to the limitations of open-source data!
🔹 Open-Source Distilled Models for Mathematical Reasoning
PromptCoT-DS-1.5B (Distilled from DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B, 1.5B parameters) Hugging Face | ModelScope
PromptCoT-DS-7B (Distilled from DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B, 7B parameters) Hugging Face | ModelScope
[New] 🚀🚀🚀PromptCoT-QwQ-32B (Distilled from QwQ-32B, 32B parameters)
Hugging Face | ModelScope
Training Data for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of PromptCoT-DS Series Models Hugging Face | ModelScope
[New] 🚀🚀🚀Training Data for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of PromptCoT-QwQ-32B Hugging Face | ModelScope
🏆 Superior Performance
Consistent Improvements over Deepseek CounterpartsPromptCoT-DS-7B surpasses DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B across all major benchmarks, achieving consistent improvements in problem-solving accuracy. The results, averaged over 8 random seeds, highlight the following gains:
+0.9% absolute improvement on MATH-500 (93.7% vs. 92.8%)
+3.2% absolute improvement on AIME2024 (58.7% vs. 55.5%)
+9.2% absolute improvement on AIME2025 (49.2% vs. 40.0%)
Competitive with 32B Models
Despite having only 7B parameters, PromptCoT-DS-7B achieves results comparable to larger 32B models such as S1-32B and LIMO-32B.
Performance Comparison of Different Models
Model
GSM8K
MATH-500
AIME2024
AIME2025
🔹 1.5B Models
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B
-
83.9%
28.9%
28.1%
STILL-3-1.5B-preview
-
85.5%
39.3%
-
DeepScaleR-1.5B-Preview
-
🟢 87.8%
🟢 43.1%
🟢 37.1%
PromptCoT-DS-1.5B (ours)
🟢 87.6% ± 0.5%
85.3% ± 1.1%
41.2% ± 6.9%
36.7% ± 6.2%
🔹 7B Models
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
-
92.8%
55.5%
40.0%
Qwen2.5-7B-SimpleRL
-
82.4%
26.7%
-
OpenThinker-7B
-
89.6%
30.0%
33.3%
OpenR1-Qwen-7B
-
90.6%
36.7%
40.0%
PromptCoT-DS-7B (ours)
🔥 92.8% ± 0.5%
🔥 93.7% ± 0.7%
🔥 58.7% ± 3.1%
🔥 49.2% ± 7.9%
🔹 32B Models
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
-
94.3%
72.6%
-
S1-32B
-
93.0%
56.7%
26.6%
LIMO-32B
-
94.8%
57.1%
46.6%
QwQ-32B
-
-
82.1%
70.8%
PromptCoT-QwQ-32B (ours)
🔥🔥 96.4% ± 0.2%
🔥🔥 96.7% ± 0.5%
🔥🔥 83.8% ± 2.8%
🔥🔥 75.4% ± 4.7%
Challenging RL-Based Methods Without RL
Despite relying purely on distillation, PromptCoT-DS-1.5B achieves competitive results against RL-based models like STILL-3-1.5B-preview and DeepScaleR-1.5B-Preview, highlighting the strength of our problem generation pipeline.
⚡ Efficiency Without Compromise
Compared to DeepScaleR-1.5B-Preview, PromptCoT-DS-1.5B achieves 40+% AIME scores while using over 15× fewer A100 GPU hours (240 A100 hours vs. 3,800 A100 hours). This makes PromptCoT-DS-1.5B a highly efficient and cost-effective solution for mathematical reasoning.
Overview
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advancements in mathematical reasoning. However, acquiring challenging and high-quality Olympiad-level problems at scale remains a significant challenge. Existing datasets often lack the necessary complexity to further enhance the capabilities of state-of-the-art models.
PromptCoT introduces a method to systematically generate high-quality Olympiad-level math problems by modeling the rationale behind expert problem design. This approach improves problem diversity and difficulty while ensuring logically consistent problem construction.
Concept-Guided Problem Synthesis: PromptCoT generates problems by systematically combining mathematical concepts, allowing for a scalable and flexible way to create a diverse range of challenging problems.
Rationale-Driven Problem Formulation: Instead of directly generating problems, PromptCoT first constructs an intermediate reasoning process (rationale)—a step-by-step thought process that mimics how expert problem designers craft questions. This rationale helps bridge the gap between abstract mathematical concepts and well-formed problems, ensuring logical consistency and problem difficulty.
Rejection Sampling for Quality Control: Problems undergo an automated evaluation process where multiple reward models assess their quality. Only problems receiving the highest scores are retained, ensuring the final dataset consists of challenging and high-quality mathematical problems.
Scalability & Adaptability: The method allows for large-scale problem generation across a wide range of mathematical domains. Additionally, the rationale-driven approach can be adapted to other structured reasoning tasks beyond mathematics.
Quick Start: Generating Olympiad-Level Problems
Follow these steps to generate problems using PromptCoT.
To ensure only the highest-quality problems are used for training, we apply a filtering process based on reward scores. Problems that receive perfect ratings from multiple evaluators are retained.
📌 Our curated dataset of high-quality problems (where each problem received perfect ratings across all evaluation criteria) is available here: Hugging Face | ModelScope
Distillation
After generating high-quality problems, we distill the knowledge into smaller models using Deepseek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B as the teacher model. We train:
You can reproduce the training process for the model using DeepSpeed with the following commands. Make sure to replace the paths with your own data and model paths.
If you find PromptCoT useful, please consider citing:
@article{zhao2025promptcot,
author = {Zhao, Xueliang and Wu, Wei and Guan, Jian and Kong, Lingpeng},
title = {PromptCoT: Synthesizing Olympiad-Level Problems for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models},
year = {2025},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02324},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02324}
}