Views
No views yet
evaluation_pipeline.sentence_zero_shot / reading / finetune), zero manual editing of predictions.| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| BLiMP (filtered) | 68.70 |
| BLiMP Supplement | 57.24 |
| EWoK | 1.53 (form-degenerate; shared by all non-baseline teams) |
| Entity Tracking | 19.98 (near-chance; see note) |
| COMPS | 52.55 |
| Reading | 0.86 |
| GLUE | 58.72 |
| AoA | ~0 |
| Text Average (8-col) | 32.45 |
Note on Entity Tracking. Run through the official pipeline, these weights score 19.98 on the full ET set, and the number is deterministic: three independent re-runs give 19.98, and applying first-index versus random tiebreaks to the same captured log-probs gives 19.98 either way (100 random draws, std 0.00). Internal evaluation corroborates it (~18.6 at step 18k). An earlier standing submission recorded ET ~42, but that figure is not reproducible from these released weights and we do not carry it forward. We report 19.98, the model's actual output.
RWKV7ForCausalLM), 8 layers, n_embd 384, vocab 32,0001from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
2
3model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
4 "yashmahe2018/rwkv7-halfclm-strict-small", trust_remote_code=True
5)
6tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
7 "yashmahe2018/rwkv7-halfclm-strict-small", trust_remote_code=True
8)