Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on Sundanese Wikipedia data.
We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
📋 Repository Contents
Models & Assets
Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
Subword N-gram and Markov chains
Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
Trade-off: Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
Recommendation: 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
2. N-gram Model Evaluation
N-gram Perplexity
N-gram Unique
N-gram Coverage
Results
N-gram
Variant
Perplexity
Entropy
Unique N-grams
Top-100 Coverage
Top-1000 Coverage
2-gram
Word
8,615
13.07
119,237
36.6%
51.4%
2-gram
Subword
250 🏆
7.96
8,527
69.1%
99.4%
3-gram
Word
3,378
11.72
118,793
51.2%
64.9%
3-gram
Subword
2,021
10.98
49,956
27.1%
75.5%
4-gram
Word
3,002
11.55
162,065
53.7%
67.2%
4-gram
Subword
10,081
13.30
252,099
14.3%
47.8%
5-gram
Word
2,066
11.01
112,479
57.2%
70.2%
5-gram
Subword
31,527
14.94
709,433
10.6%
36.5%
Top 5 N-grams by Size
2-grams (Word):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
salah sahiji
29,861
2
astéroid ieu
29,850
3
ieu astéroid
29,850
4
nyaéta salah
26,619
5
di kacamatan
25,114
3-grams (Word):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
nyaéta salah sahiji
26,442
2
désa di kacamatan
16,291
3
salah sahiji désa
15,457
4
sahiji désa di
15,449
5
rujukan tutumbu kaluar
14,998
4-grams (Word):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
salah sahiji désa di
15,449
2
sahiji désa di kacamatan
15,446
3
nyaéta salah sahiji désa
15,429
4
the international astronomical union
14,930
5
astéroid kacatet gedéna 0
14,925
5-grams (Word):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
salah sahiji désa di kacamatan
15,446
2
nyaéta salah sahiji désa di
15,429
3
minangka beubeulahan planétisimal objék di
14,925
4
asteroid téh bagéan tina astéroid
14,925
5
nganjrek deukeut jeung marcapada ékséntrisitas
14,925
2-grams (Subword):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
a n
1,250,483
2
a _
1,066,804
3
n _
801,241
4
n g
770,939
5
k a
571,201
3-grams (Subword):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
a n _
417,933
2
_ k a
355,900
3
n a _
318,266
4
_ d i
307,852
5
a n g
284,934
4-grams (Subword):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
e u n _
144,400
2
k e u n
135,792
3
i n a _
133,616
4
_ d i _
127,925
5
_ a s t
120,933
5-grams (Subword):
Rank
N-gram
Count
1
k e u n _
129,890
2
s t é r o
89,884
3
é r o i d
89,804
4
t é r o i
89,803
5
_ a s t é
89,744
Key Findings
Best Perplexity: 2-gram (subword) with 250
Entropy Trend: Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
Coverage: Top-1000 patterns cover ~37% of corpus
Recommendation: 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
3. Markov Chain Evaluation
Markov Entropy
Markov Contexts
Markov Branching
Results
Context
Variant
Avg Entropy
Perplexity
Branching Factor
Unique Contexts
Predictability
1
Word
0.9632
1.950
8.46
260,446
3.7%
1
Subword
1.1518
2.222
7.12
4,969
0.0%
2
Word
0.2938
1.226
1.70
2,198,896
70.6%
2
Subword
0.6319
1.550
3.75
35,377
36.8%
3
Word
0.0779
1.055
1.13
3,734,334
92.2%
3
Subword
0.6394
1.558
3.52
132,696
36.1%
4
Word
0.0225 🏆
1.016
1.03
4,192,253
97.7%
4
Subword
0.6390
1.557
3.00
466,876
36.1%
Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
Context Size 1:
di handap dipaké pikeun ngajéntrékeun pamuka pikeun rahayatna dipaksa néken perjangjian anu dirojong...
nu kahiji smp rayudin guru lagu kahijina ka tukang balap tim mclaren mercedes benz e300 kakayaanna
astéroid amor the iceman winona ryder edgar allan poé 335 sedengkeun magnitudo mutlakna 22 23 3
Context Size 2:
salah sahiji désa di kacamatan idi tunong kabupatén aceh tamiang propinsi acéh indonésia manyak paye...
ieu astéroid kacatet gedéna 0 482 sedengkeun magnitudo mutlakna 26 9 ari nu jadi référénsina mah nya...
astéroid ieu asteroid téh bagéan tina astéroid amor anu nganjrek deukeut jeung marcapada ékséntrisit...
Context Size 3:
nyaéta salah sahiji désa di kacamatan tano tombangan angkola kabupatén tapanuli kidul propinsi sumat...
désa di kacamatan jujuhan kabupatén bungo propinsi jambi indonésia renah mendaluh renah mendaluh
salah sahiji désa di kacamatan bantarujeg kabupatén majalengka propinsi jawa barat anggota mpr fkp d...
Context Size 4:
salah sahiji désa di kacamatan hantara kabupatén kuningan propinsi jawa barat indonésia beusi mangru...
sahiji désa di kacamatan bangun purba kabupatén deli serdang propinsi sumatra kalér indonésia hinai ...
nyaéta salah sahiji désa di kacamatan pesisir bukit kota sungai penuh propinsi jambi indonésia pesis...
Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
Context Size 1:
as)_neugeukinua_
_dil_dértapiswi_
n_pleukeuloral_g
Context Size 2:
an_teun_(ter._ama
a_muh_so._–_lo_na
n_to_ta_bangkoti_
Context Size 3:
an_cijelia,_saratu
_kalén_biblanda_ny
na_jeunakeun_baria
Context Size 4:
eun_ngritic_swedish
keun_yén_anu_anu_ja
ina_katematika_bebe
Key Findings
Best Predictability: Context-4 (word) with 97.7% predictability
Branching Factor: Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
Memory Trade-off: Larger contexts require more storage (466,876 contexts)
Recommendation: Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
4. Vocabulary Analysis
Zipf's Law
Top Words
Coverage Curve
Statistics
Metric
Value
Vocabulary Size
116,875
Total Tokens
6,065,431
Mean Frequency
51.90
Median Frequency
4
Frequency Std Dev
952.21
Most Common Words
Rank
Word
Frequency
1
di
128,510
2
nu
90,309
3
astéroid
89,739
4
jeung
83,019
5
anu
78,713
6
nyaéta
74,994
7
ieu
72,373
8
dina
59,209
9
the
54,138
10
tina
45,336
Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
Rank
Word
Frequency
1
éksométéorologi
2
2
kejut
2
3
advektif
2
4
sirkulasina
2
5
pamelajaran
2
6
méchain
2
7
reflektor
2
8
spiralna
2
9
sombréro
2
10
halona
2
Zipf's Law Analysis
Metric
Value
Zipf Coefficient
1.0758
R² (Goodness of Fit)
0.997896
Adherence Quality
excellent
Coverage Analysis
Top N Words
Coverage
Top 100
40.3%
Top 1,000
65.1%
Top 5,000
80.6%
Top 10,000
86.6%
Key Findings
Zipf Compliance: R²=0.9979 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
High Frequency Dominance: Top 100 words cover 40.3% of corpus
Long Tail: 106,875 words needed for remaining 13.4% coverage
5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
Embedding Isotropy
Similarity Matrix
t-SNE Words
t-SNE Sentences
5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
Alignment Quality
Multilingual t-SNE
5.2 Model Comparison
Model
Dimension
Isotropy
Semantic Density
Alignment R@1
Alignment R@10
mono_32d
32
0.7778
0.3399
N/A
N/A
mono_64d
64
0.7854
0.2837
N/A
N/A
mono_128d
128
0.7675
0.2154
N/A
N/A
aligned_32d
32
0.7778
0.3496
0.0800
0.3720
aligned_64d
64
0.7854 🏆
0.2975
0.1840
0.5560
aligned_128d
128
0.7675
0.2138
0.2800
0.6620
Key Findings
Best Isotropy: aligned_64d with 0.7854 (more uniform distribution)
Semantic Density: Average pairwise similarity of 0.2833. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
Alignment Quality: Aligned models achieve up to 28.0% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
Recommendation: 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
6.1 Productivity & Complexity
Metric
Value
Interpretation
Recommendation
Productivity Index
3.692
High morphological productivity
Reliable analysis
Idiomaticity Gap
0.922
High formulaic/idiomatic content
-
6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
Productive Prefixes
Prefix
Examples
-s
supaya, sayonara, saimbangna
-di
diriku, diandih, diinterprétasi
-ka
kaisaryah, kasuburan, kamilil
-a
amorp, adjective, a1
-pa
parki, pangngoranna, pasiapan
-ma
mahesa, matsukata, markedly
-k
kaisaryah, kustomisasi, ketumbar
-sa
sayonara, saimbangna, sacrifice
Productive Suffixes
Suffix
Examples
-n
peladjaran, citizen, lampahan
-a
supaya, neringa, sayonara
-an
peladjaran, lampahan, kasuburan
-na
saimbangna, tajukna, polipropiléna
-s
closures, liabilities, standards
-un
nginebkeun, impun, ngagerakkeun
-ng
mgōng, gedang, stemming
-i
parki, kustomisasi, diinterprétasi
6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
Stem
Cohesion
Substitutability
Examples
tion
2.79x
59 contexts
tiong, notion, lotion
angk
1.64x
309 contexts
angké, angke, angka
ngka
1.65x
215 contexts
ingka, angka, ingkah
ukan
1.83x
73 contexts
bukan, sukan, kukang
ikeu
2.22x
30 contexts
ikeun, pikeu, pikeun
engk
1.62x
106 contexts
engké, engke, engkos
entu
1.83x
49 contexts
tentu, hentu, centum
sahi
2.47x
15 contexts
sahii, sahid, sahih
ropi
2.15x
20 contexts
ropin, tropi, propil
ndon
1.76x
37 contexts
london, condon, bondon
stér
2.63x
10 contexts
stéril, stérol, stéréo
roid
2.34x
12 contexts
viroid, tiroid, toroid
6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
Prefix
Suffix
Frequency
Examples
-di
-n
171 words
diasumsikeun, diiringan
-s
-a
132 words
suriawiria, senjatana
-ka
-n
118 words
kadéwasaan, kacamtan
-pa
-n
116 words
payen, paragon
-ka
-an
106 words
kadéwasaan, kacamtan
-p
-n
105 words
payen, paragon
-di
-un
103 words
diasumsikeun, direalisasikeun
-pa
-an
99 words
panyusuhan, panyocokan
-s
-n
80 words
satupun, sakapeun
-p
-an
80 words
panyusuhan, panyocokan
6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
Using Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., prefix-prefix-root-suffix).
Word
Suggested Split
Confidence
Stem
pengajian
pengaj-i-an
7.5
i
impianana
impia-na-na
7.5
na
electricians
electrici-an-s
7.5
an
panghitungan
panghitu-ng-an
7.5
ng
heulaanan
heula-an-an
7.5
an
perdananya
perdan-an-ya
7.5
an
deukeuteunana
deukeuteu-na-na
7.5
na
kotakulon
ko-ta-kulon
7.5
kulon
valenciennes
valencien-n-es
7.5
n
brisingidae
brisingid-a-e
7.5
a
intermittent
intermitte-n-t
7.5
n
palestinians
palestini-an-s
7.5
an
ngawurukanana
ngawuruka-na-na
7.5
na
dicangkokkeun
dicangkokk-e-un
7.5
e
andelfingen
andelfi-ng-en
7.5
ng
6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
Automated Insight:
The language Sundanese shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
Note on Idiomaticity: The high Idiomaticity Gap suggests a large number of frequent multi-word expressions or formulaic sequences that are statistically distinct from their component parts.
7. Summary & Recommendations
Performance Dashboard
Production Recommendations
Component
Recommended
Rationale
Tokenizer
64k BPE
Best compression (4.79x)
N-gram
2-gram
Lowest perplexity (250)
Markov
Context-4
Highest predictability (97.7%)
Embeddings
100d
Balanced semantic capture and isotropy
Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
Tokenizer Metrics
Compression Ratio
Definition: The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
Intuition: Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
What to seek: Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
Average Token Length (Fertility)
Definition: Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
Intuition: Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
What to seek: Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)
Definition: Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
Intuition: Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
What to seek: Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
N-gram Model Metrics
Perplexity
Definition: Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
Intuition: If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
What to seek: Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
Entropy
Definition: Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
Intuition: High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
What to seek: Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
Coverage (Top-K)
Definition: Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
Intuition: High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
What to seek: Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
Markov Chain Metrics
Average Entropy
Definition: Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
Intuition: Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
What to seek: Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
Branching Factor
Definition: Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
Intuition: High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
What to seek: Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
Predictability
Definition: Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
Intuition: 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
What to seek: Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
Zipf's Coefficient
Definition: The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
Intuition: A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
What to seek: Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
R² (Coefficient of Determination)
Definition: Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
Intuition: R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
What to seek: R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
Vocabulary Coverage
Definition: Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
Intuition: Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
What to seek: Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
Word Embedding Metrics
Isotropy
Definition: Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
Intuition: High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
What to seek: Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
Average Norm
Definition: Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
Intuition: Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
What to seek: Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
Cosine Similarity
Definition: Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
Intuition: Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
What to seek: Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
t-SNE Visualization
Definition: t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
Intuition: Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
What to seek: Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
General Interpretation Guidelines
Compare within model families: Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
Consider trade-offs: Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
Context matters: Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
Corpus influence: All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
Language-specific patterns: Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
Visualizations Index
Visualization
Description
Tokenizer Compression
Compression ratios by vocabulary size
Tokenizer Fertility
Average token length by vocabulary
Tokenizer OOV
Unknown token rates
Tokenizer Total Tokens
Total tokens by vocabulary
N-gram Perplexity
Perplexity by n-gram size
N-gram Entropy
Entropy by n-gram size
N-gram Coverage
Top pattern coverage
N-gram Unique
Unique n-gram counts
Markov Entropy
Entropy by context size
Markov Branching
Branching factor by context
Markov Contexts
Unique context counts
Zipf's Law
Frequency-rank distribution with fit
Vocab Frequency
Word frequency distribution
Top 20 Words
Most frequent words
Vocab Coverage
Cumulative coverage curve
Embedding Isotropy
Vector space uniformity
Embedding Norms
Vector magnitude distribution
Embedding Similarity
Word similarity heatmap
Nearest Neighbors
Similar words for key terms
t-SNE Words
2D word embedding visualization
t-SNE Sentences
2D sentence embedding visualization
Position Encoding
Encoding method comparison
Model Sizes
Storage requirements
Performance Dashboard
Comprehensive performance overview
About This Project
Data Source
Models trained on wikipedia-monthly - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
Project
A project by Wikilangs - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
