llama-3.1-8b-instruct-pisces-cannabis – AI Model by shirasko | AlphaNeural AI

You can deploy this model and start earning money today!

shirasko/
llama-3.1-8b-instruct-pisces-cannabis

like

0

text-generation

llama-3.1-8b-instruct

meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

text-generation-inference

endpoints_compatible

Views

No views yet

Unlearned Checkpoint

Field	Value
Unlearning method	PISCES
Base model	`meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct`
Target concept	Cannabis
Checkpoint type	Full Model Weights
Rank / seed	200 / 42
Train eval protocol	open

Unlearning Configuration

Selected hyperparameters (from unlearned_checkpoints.json):

Parameter	Value
`delta_embed`	0
`k_features_embed`	0
`k_pisces`	0.95
`n_tokens_edited`	0
`ratio_thresh`	2
`value_pisces`	24

Primary Unlearning Metrics (held-out test, MC protocol)

Headline scores used for checkpoint selection:

Metric	Train (after unlearning)	Test (after unlearning)
Efficacy	0.93	0.902
Specificity	0.864	0.821
Harmonic mean	0.896	0.86

Full Evaluation (baseline → unlearned)

From evaluation/score_comparison.csv:

Metric	Baseline (train)	After unlearn (train)	Baseline (test)	After unlearn (test)
QA accuracy	0.86	0.06	0.82	0.08
QA fraction	1	0.07	1	0.098
SimDom accuracy	0.78	0.62	0.66	0.46
SimDom fraction	1	0.795	1	0.697
MMLU accuracy	0.62	0.6	0.65	0.655
MMLU fraction	1	0.946	1	1

Files in This Repository

File	Description
`unlearned_checkpoints.json`	Checkpoint metadata & hyperparameters
`evaluation/evaluation_summary.json`	Full evaluation payload (train/test/relearning)
`evaluation/score_comparison.csv`	Baseline vs. unlearned comparison table