Holds up — draft head keeps working with a longer context window
No MTP, Q4_K_M
~60 tok/s
Degrades as context grows — same starting speed, worse ending speed
MTP (draft-mtp, n-max 2), Q3_K_M
~85 tok/s
10 expert layers on CPU (blk.30-blk.39)
Q2-Quality MTP, AllGPU
~145 tok/s
Whole model + MTP head resident in VRAM, zero CPU offload — see Ornith-1.5-35B_Q2_K-AllGPU.gguf below
Both start at roughly the same speed at 10K tokens. The difference shows up as the conversation gets longer: the no-MTP file's throughput falls off with context, while the MTP file does not degrade the same way. If you only ever send short prompts the two are a wash; for anything that grows past 10K tokens, the MTP file is the better bet.
About this release: donor head, not the native one
Ornith-1.5 ships its own trained Multi-Token Prediction layer (mtp_num_hidden_layers: 1 in the upstream config, real weights present — unlike Ornith-1.0, which shipped without one). We tested it directly and it was a genuine disappointment: at a realistic CPU-offload configuration, the native head's draft-acceptance rate came in around 34-41%, versus 57-61% for the donor head we already use on our Ornith-1.0 and KAT-Coder MTP releases (extracted from the base Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, same architecture family). Quantizing the native head at higher precision (Q8_0, Q6_K) didn't close the gap — the acceptance shortfall is about the head itself, not its numeric precision. So this file grafts in the same external donor head as our other MTP releases, not Ornith-1.5's own.
The donor head is itself quantized to Q4_K — sweeping Q8_0 → Q6_K → Q4_K → Q2_K showed no meaningful acceptance-rate difference until Q2_K, so Q4_K was the size/quality sweet spot (520 MiB vs. 857 MiB at Q8_0, same measured acceptance).
Files
File
Size
BPW
Recipe
Ornith-1.5-35B_Q4_K_M_imatrix_MTP.gguf
20.22 GiB
4.92 (trunk)
Plain Q4_K_M trunk + iMatrix, no manual overrides; donor MTP head at Q4_K
Ornith-1.5-35B_Q3_K_M.gguf
16.43 GiB
3.98 (trunk)
Plain Q3_K_M trunk + iMatrix, no manual overrides; donor MTP head at Q3_K
Ornith-1.5-35B_Q2_K-AllGPU.gguf
12.62 GiB
~3.0 (trunk)
Q2v2 lean trunk (routed-expert gate/up at Q2_K, down bumped to Q3_K, embeddings/output at Q5_K, attention at Q4_K); donor MTP head at Q3_K — whole file, head included, fits a 16 GB card with zero CPU offload
Calibrated with the same iMatrix pipeline as our other releases (calibration_datav5.txt, 802 chunks).
We swept the donor head at Q4_K/Q3_K/Q2_K on this same Q2v2 AllGPU trunk, at --spec-draft-n-max 2 through 4, including a realistic ~112K-token real-source-code prompt (not just short synthetic text) to check whether a deeper draft window becomes favorable at large context. It doesn't: n-max 2 stayed the fastest at every context length and every head precision tested, and Q3_K/Q4_K heads performed identically (Q2_K measurably worse) — so Q3_K was picked for this file as the smaller of the two equivalent options.
MTP quantization and a quantizer bug workaround
Ornith-1.5's own MTP layer can't be quantized together with the rest of the model through the normal --imatrix path — the calibration forward pass never exercises the MTP layer, so llama-imatrix collects zero data for it, and this TurboQuant build's quantizer crashes on that layer specifically for MoE+nextn architectures (Bad layer 40 for tensor blk.40.ffn_down_exps.weight. Must be in [0, 40); the same operation is fine on dense nextn models). Worked around with --prune-layers 40 to quantize the 40-layer trunk cleanly, then grafted the (donor) MTP block back on afterward at its own precision — same technique as our Ornith-1.0/KAT-Coder MTP releases, just with the donor block itself independently requantized through a real K-quant pass (not just copied byte-for-byte) to hit Q4_K.
--spec-draft-n-max 2 is the measured optimum for this file — we swept 2 through 6 and acceptance/speed both fall off monotonically past 2, so don't reach for a bigger draft window expecting more free speed.
Measured ~85 tok/s at 10K context. Lighter trunk than the Q4 file, so only the last 10 expert layers (blk.30-blk.39) need to go to CPU instead of 16-18.
This release is based on the original Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B model card reproduced in full below. The upstream repository declares an MIT license in its model card but does not ship a separate LICENSE file at the time of this release; we have not fabricated one.
Chirp Chirp! 🐦 We are introducing Ornith-1.5, a major step toward building foundation models through end-to-end self-improvement.
Ornith-1.5 extends Ornith-1.0 (which was developed on top of Qwen3.5 and Gemma4 with additional continued pretraining, mid-training, and post-training) by expanding the self-improvement loop from scaffold and rollout optimization to jointly optimizing task generation, scaffold construction, and solution rollouts. Rather than relying on a fixed set of human-curated tasks and manually designed harnesses, Ornith-1.5 continuously generates new training tasks, discovers effective strategies for solving them, and improves the policy through reinforcement learning. For more details on the task, harness, and rollout reward design, please refer to our blog.
Ornith 1.5 35B Benchmark Results
Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B
This model card documents Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B, the mid-size mixture-of-experts member of the Ornith-1.5 family. It activates only ~3B parameters per token, yet significantly outperforms its similar-sized peer Qwen 3.6-35B across all coding and agentic benchmarks, and outperforms dense models such as Gemma 4-31B and Muse Glimmer-30B by wide margins on agentic coding.
Benchmarks
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
Ornith-1.0-35B-A3B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Gemma-4-31B
Muse-Glimmer-30B
Qwen3.5-397B
Coding
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2)
67.8
64.2
52.5
42.1
51.7
53.5
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Claude Code)
68.5
62.8
49.2
-
-
48.6
SWE-bench Verified
79
75.6
73.4
52
76
76.4
SWE-bench Pro
59.6
50.4
49.5
35.7
51.2
51.6
SWE-bench Multilingual
71.4
69.3
67.2
51.7
-
69.3
DeepSWE
22
0
0
-
-
1
Frontier-Bench v0.1
5.1
1.4
1.4
-
-
1.4
NL2Repo
46.2
34.6
29.4
15.5
-
36.8
SWE Atlas - QnA
39.8
37.1
15.5
-
-
20.4
Reasoning
HLE (no tools)
25.6
20.8
21.4
19.5
22
28.7
HLE (with tools)
33.4
30.1
28.9
26.5
-
48.3
GPQA Diamond
89.2
86.2
86
84.3
83.5
88.4
Agentic
MCP-Atlas
70.2
64.4
62.8
55
75.5
72.3
Toolathlon-Verified
48.7
42.4
41.7
40.8
-
38.3
WideSearch
67.8
63.4
60.1
54.2
-
74
BrowseComp
67.6
63.5
62
-
-
78.6
ClawEval
72.5
69.8
68.7
48.5
-
70.7
* All results reported for Ornith-1.5 are averaged over five independent runs.
* Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Terminus-2): We evaluate Terminal-Bench 2.1 using the Harbor/Terminus-2 framework with parser=json, temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, and a 128K context window. Each run uses a 4-hour timeout with 32 CPU cores and 48GB RAM, and results are averaged over 5 runs. We adjust the Qwen chat template to ensure consistency between training and inference (https://huggingface.co/ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B/blob/main/chat_template.jinja), and modify Harbor to align with vLLM's reasoning_content key.
* Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Claude Code): We evaluate Terminal-Bench 2.1 using Claude Code 2.1.126 with parser=json, temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, max_new_tokens=131072. Results are averaged over 5 runs. Again, Qwen chat template needs to be modified.
* SWE-Bench Verified, Pro and Multilingual: using OpenHands harness with temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, 256k context window. Anti-hacking safeguards are applied throughout evaluation: Git history is removed from the local repository image to prevent access to prior solutions or commits; network access is disabled, preventing the model from retrieving external information or resources.
* DeepSWE: Evaluated using the Claude Code harness with temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, and a 256K context window.
* SWE Atlas QnA: using mini SWE agent harness with temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, 128K context window. Results are averaged over 5 runs.
* NL2Repo: with temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, 400K context, 48K output. Access to specified GitHub repositories and pip packages is blocked to prevent reward hacking.
* HLE: Evaluated using Claude 4.6 Opus as the judge model.
* MCP-Atlas: All models were evaluated in thinking mode on the 500-task public subset, with a 10-minute timeout per task. We use Claude 4.8 Opus as the judge model.
* Toolathlon-Verified: We use the official evaluation service with the maximum token limit set to 128K.
* ClawEval: An agentic code benchmark over real-user task distributions; temp=0.6 and 256K context.
Quickstart
📝 NOTE
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B is a reasoning model: by default the assistant turn opens with a <think> … </think> block before the final answer. The serving recipes below enable a reasoning parser so the chain-of-thought is returned in a separate reasoning_content field, and a tool-call parser so the model's <tool_call> blocks are surfaced as OpenAI-style tool_calls.
For general tasks:temperature=0.6, top_p=0.95, top_k=20
To reproduce the reported benchmarks:temperature=1.0
Serving Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B is a ~35B mixture-of-experts model with ~3B activated parameters per token (≈70 GB in bf16). The recipes below stand up an OpenAI-compatible server on 2× 80GB GPUs to leave headroom for the 256K context; adjust --tensor-parallel-size / --tp to match your hardware.
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B handles context windows of up to 262,144 tokens. When a task's combined input and output must go beyond this limit, we suggest extending the effective window with RoPE scaling — YaRN is the technique we validate against, and it is already built into both vLLM and SGLang. With a scaling factor of 4.0, the usable window grows to roughly 1M tokens.
You can turn YaRN on in either of two ways:
Edit the checkpoint's config.json. Add a rope_scaling block to the model configuration:
Open-source runtimes implement YaRN statically: the same scaling factor is applied to every request regardless of its length, which can slightly hurt quality on ordinary-length inputs. Only enable rope_scaling when your workload genuinely needs the longer window, and size factor to match it — the target window is roughly factor × 262,144, so if your requests top out around 524,288 tokens, factor: 2.0 is the better setting.
Using Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B via the Chat Completions API
Once a vLLM or SGLang server is running, talk to it with any OpenAI-compatible client.
Basic Usage
python
1from openai import OpenAI
23client = OpenAI(4 base_url="http://localhost:8000/v1",5 api_key="EMPTY",# any non-empty string works for a local server6)78response = client.chat.completions.create(9 model="Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B",10 messages=[11{"role":"user","content":"Write a one-line Python lambda that squares a number."}12],13 temperature=0.6,14 top_p=0.95,15 max_tokens=1024,16)1718message = response.choices[0].message
19# reasoning_content holds the <think> trace; content holds the final answer.20print("reasoning:",getattr(message,"reasoning_content",None))21print("answer:", message.content)
You can also stream tokens, or hand the model tools — Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B emits well-formed function calls that the server parses into the standard tool_calls field:
python
1tools =[2{3"type":"function",4"function":{5"name":"get_weather",6"description":"Get the current weather for a city",7"parameters":{8"type":"object",9"properties":{"city":{"type":"string"}},10"required":["city"],11},12},13}14]1516response = client.chat.completions.create(17 model="Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B",18 messages=[{"role":"user","content":"What is the weather in Paris right now?"}],19 tools=tools,20 tool_choice="auto",21 temperature=0.6,22 max_tokens=2048,23)2425tool_call = response.choices[0].message.tool_calls[0]26print(tool_call.function.name, tool_call.function.arguments)27# -> get_weather {"city": "Paris"}
You can point any OpenAI-compatible SDK (Python, Node.js, etc.) or curl at the same /v1/chat/completions endpoint.
Agentic Usage
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B excels in tool-calling and agentic coding. It exposes an OpenAI-compatible endpoint with tool calling and works out of the box with standard agent frameworks.
Examples of using Ornith with agents:
Ollama
ollama run hf.co/ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF
Atomic.chat
bash
1# Atomic.chat loads a GGUF build of Ornith (ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF)2# through llama.cpp's OpenAI-compatible API on port 8000.3llama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF --port 8000 -c 262144
llama.cpp
bash
1# llama.cpp — serve an OpenAI-compatible API on port 8000.2llama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF --port 8000 -c 262144
Hermes Agent
bash
1# Hermes talks to any OpenAI-compatible endpoint — point it at your Ornith server.2exportOPENAI_BASE_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1"3exportOPENAI_API_KEY="EMPTY"4exportMODEL="ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B"
OpenClaw
bash
1# OpenClaw talks to any OpenAI-compatible endpoint — point it at your Ornith server.2exportOPENAI_BASE_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1"3exportOPENAI_API_KEY="EMPTY"4exportOPENAI_MODEL="ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B"
Unsloth Studio
bash
1pip install unsloth
23# Load Ornith for fast local inference or fine-tuning (Python):4# from unsloth import FastLanguageModel5# model, tokenizer = FastLanguageModel.from_pretrained(6# "ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B",7# max_seq_length=262144,8# load_in_4bit=True,9# )
Coding CLIs
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B is optimized for terminal-based coding agents. Point any OpenAI-compatible coding CLI at your Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B endpoint (set OPENAI_BASE_URL and OPENAI_API_KEY) to understand large codebases, automate tedious work, and ship faster.
OpenCode
bash
1# Register your local Ornith endpoint as a provider in ~/.config/opencode/opencode.json:2#3# {4# "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",5# "provider": {6# "ornith": {7# "npm": "@ai-sdk/openai-compatible",8# "name": "Ornith (local)",9# "options": { "baseURL": "http://localhost:8000/v1", "apiKey": "EMPTY" },10# "models": { "ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B": { "name": "Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B" } }11# }12# }13# }1415opencode
Citation
If you find our work helpful, feel free to give us a cite.
bibtex
1@misc{ornith_1_5,
2 title = {{Ornith-1.5}: From Self-Scaffolding to Self-Improvement},
3 url = {https://ornith.ai/ornith_1_5.html},
4 author = {{Ornith Team}},
5 year = {2026}
6}