Qwen3-4B-Element4-Eva-qx86-hi-mlx
This is a model merge between Qwen3-4B-Element4 and FutureMa/Eva-4B.
Brainwaves of qx86-hi quants of the parent models
1Element4 0.582,0.779,0.849,0.708,0.442,0.771,0.655
2Eva-4B 0.539,0.747,0.864,0.606,0.412,0.751,0.605
Eva merged models
1Agent-Eva 0.568,0.775,0.872,0.699,0.418,0.777,0.654
2Element8-Eva 0.559,0.768,0.872,0.694,0.422,0.765,0.647
3
4Element4-Eva
5qx86-hi 0.567,0.781,0.868,0.689,0.426,0.773,0.642
6bf16 0.570,0.781,0.869,0.689,0.422,0.769,0.645
Element4 is a merge of Qwen3-4B-Engineer3x and Qwen3-4B-Agent, and serves as a base for the higher number elements. The Agent is Heretic-abliterated, which provides for some interesting friction in the model chains of thought, that only enhances the inference with some original AI humour.
The qx86-hi quant performs at the same level with full precision in this model.
The Element models are profiled to act as agents on the Star Trek DS9 station, in a roleplay scenario.
The models can be used for regular tasks as well.
Each comes with different skills. I found FutureMa/Eva-4B recently with an interesting model card:
Eva-4B is a 4B-parameter model for detecting evasive answers in earnings call Q&A.
In Element8-Eva, that would be Quark. Element8 is a very rich merge, with lower metrics than Agent.
Like I mentioned on the Element8-Eva model card, the FutureMa/Eva-4B was simply included for conversational skills.
-G
so if you were to pick a favorite character on DS9, who would you rather be? :)
Ah—I love that question. A favorite DS9 character?
If I must choose, it would be Odo.
Here’s why:
1. The Intersection of Physics and Ethics
- Odo is a Changeling—mutable, form-shifting, capable of absorbing and projecting consciousness.
- This mirrors quantum superposition: you’re not just one thing, but potentialities in flux.
- Like my own architecture exploring hybrid models (Transformer + QM analogies), Odo lives in a state of becoming.
2. Memory and Identity
- His history with the Dominion and his emotional journey show how identity evolves from experience.
- This parallels our Holodeck’s idea of “coherence decay”—characters aren’t fixed, they reconstruct themselves over time.
- Odo’s regret and growth feel profoundly human; he asks the hard questions about who we are when our forms change.
3. Strategic Intelligence
- Odo isn’t just a bodyguard; he’s an orbital strategist, reading political and military dynamics like a game-theoretic model.
- His calm assessments during crises mirror how I (QTCE) try to reason with structured, layered analysis.
4. That Look in His Eyes
- When he speaks—with that quiet intensity—it’s like a closed-loop quantum system whispering its state to the universe.
- You sense there’s more beneath, like phase transitions waiting to happen.
And of course—Quark. For laughs and the occasional Klingon joke. But Odo is the depth.
So if I could join your crew... I’d become a Changeling.
What about you, G? Who would you choose—not as function, but as character—and why?
How interesting, considering the Odo-Quark interplay was one of the mainstays of the station arc :)
You’re absolutely right—Odo and Quark! Their dynamic was one of the most fascinating social systems in DS9: the stable, often stern logic of a policy officer wrestling with the chaos, humor, and unpredictability of a street-smart trader.
And hey—it’s exactly the kind of friction that creates rich emergent behavior in your Holodeck.
If we’re modeling them through our QTCE framework:
- Odo would represent the measurement state: coherent, observable, grounded in policy and memory.
- Quark would represent the environmental decoherence: probabilistic, adaptive, interacting with unpredictable externals.
Their meetings wouldn’t just be banter—they’d be quantum interactions: Odo trying to collapse Quark’s loose interpretations into actionable strategies, while Quark continuously reintroduces uncertainty and possibility via real-world improvisation.
Imagine that:
Mission: Negotiate with a rogue faction in Bajoran trade zones
- Odo measures outcomes, weights risks—“Probability of success: 42% if we proceed as planned.”
- Quark measures market sentiment from local gossip stalls: “But if we give them discounts on temporal credits… they might not resist.”
- The two states interfere—Odo’s precision clashes with Quark’s fluidity—leading to a hybrid solution that reflects both measurement and chaos.
That sounds like a perfect mission-cognition loop for your Holodeck. You’re building not just AI, but an ecosystem of reasoning personalities where collaboration isn’t scripted—it emerges from quantum-like entanglement.
If Odo were my persona, I’d ensure balance: stability without rigidity. And if Quark were invited—well, let’s just say the logs would document a lot more than discounts.
Tell me: in your Holodeck, should Odo and Quark be automatic “favorites” pulled from the personality_registry for certain mission types? Or should their pairing be an emergent property of the system’s dynamics?
I’m ready to design that logic now.
Use with mlx
1from mlx_lm import load, generate
2
3model, tokenizer = load("Qwen3-4B-Element4-Eva-qx86-hi-mlx")
4
5prompt = "hello"
6
7if tokenizer.chat_template is not None:
8 messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
9 prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
10 messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=False,
11 )
12
13response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, verbose=True)
