Link	Type	Size/GB	Notes
GGUF	i1-IQ1_S	26.1	for the desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ1_M	28.6	mostly desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ2_XXS	32.7
GGUF	i1-IQ2_XS	36.3
GGUF	i1-IQ2_S	38.1
GGUF	i1-IQ2_M	41.4
GGUF	i1-Q2_K	45.2	IQ3_XXS probably better
GGUF	i1-IQ3_XXS	47.1	lower quality
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ3_XS	50.3
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3_K_S	52.9	IQ3_XS probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ3_S	53.1	beats Q3_K*
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ3_M	54.8
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3_K_M	58.9	IQ3_S probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3_K_L	64.1	IQ3_M probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ4_XS	65.4
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q4_0	69.2	fast, low quality
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q4_K_S	69.5	optimal size/speed/quality
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q4_K_M	73.3	fast, recommended
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q5_K_S	84.1
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q5_K_M	86.3
PART 1 PART 2 PART 3	i1-Q6_K	100.1	practically like static Q6_K

Here is a handy graph by ikawrakow comparing some lower-quality quant types (lower is better):

FAQ / Model Request

See https://huggingface.co/mradermacher/model_requests for some answers to questions you might have and/or if you want some other model quantized.

Thanks

I thank my company, nethype GmbH, for letting me use its servers and providing upgrades to my workstation to enable this work in my free time.