Views
No views yet
step3p7 text backbone (45 layers, MoE with 288 experts / top-8) in oQ2e
gs128; vision encoder in 8-bit gs64 (~2.2 GB)| Variant | Size | bpw | thinking on | thinking off | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-3.7-Flash-oQ3e | 79 GB | ~3.3 | 0.77 | 0.57 | looks like this quant has impressive quality |
| Step-3.7-Flash-oQ2e (this repo) | 59 GB | ~2.4 | 0.68 | 0.54 | smaller and way cheaper on RAM, at a real cost in accuracy |
| Step-3.7-Flash (API, fp8) | — | — | 0.80 | n/a | StepFun endpoint via OpenRouter, reasoning_effort: low; no BF16 provider exists for this model |
reasoning_effort: low, which keeps
the model from running away, and my local runs had no such control. The API can't do
the "thinking off" column at all — the endpoint returns "Reasoning is mandatory for
this endpoint and cannot be disabled". I'll run more tests later to make each
quant's quality relative to the API clearer.<think> block, and reasoning_effort barely moves the needle
(in my probes, low/medium/high modulate thinking length by ~2×, and the default
behaves like max).enable_thinking: false (or reasoning_effort: "none"), the template prefills an empty
<think>\n</think>\n\n block, so the model skips straight to the answer — no runtime
patches, no custom parser, works in any stack that forwards chat_template_kwargs.| You pass | Behavior |
|---|---|
| (nothing) | Full thinking (default, longest) |
reasoning_effort: "low" | Shorter thinking (weak effect, not a hard cap) |
enable_thinking: false | No thinking — answers directly |
reasoning_effort: "none" | Same as enable_thinking: false |
reasoning_effort is a weak lever here. In the open weights the chat
template just injects a Reasoning: <level> line into the system prompt — no control
token, no budget, nothing that forces the model to stop. It nudges, it doesn't govern.
The hosted API behaves the same way; I got the same effect by writing that line into
the system prompt myself.thinking_budget closes the <think>
block when the budget runs out, and the model takes the hint and answers. In my tests
every response came back with a closed block and an actual answer, even when the cut
landed mid-sentence.tokenizer_class fixed — upstream declares LlamaTokenizerFast for what is a
ByteLevel BPE tokenizer, which breaks decode in transformers (literal Ġ/Ċ in
output — it silently corrupted my eval scores until I caught it). This repo sets
PreTrainedTokenizerFast, restoring correct encode and decode.enable_thinking=false / reasoning_effort="none" emit an
empty-think prefill (see Thinking control). Everything else is unchanged.1# text and vision (mlx-vlm — plain mlx-lm doesn't support the step3p7 architecture)
2mlx_vlm.generate --model mlx-community/Step-3.7-Flash-oQ2e --prompt "..."
3mlx_vlm.generate --model mlx-community/Step-3.7-Flash-oQ2e \
4 --image photo.jpg --prompt "Describe this image."
5
6# server — thinking off per request:
7# POST /v1/chat/completions
8# {"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false}, ...}
9
10# oMLX — discovers the model from the HF cache
11omlx serve