org-geo-ner is a token-classification (NER) model that extracts organizations and geographic context from affiliation strings. It was fine-tuned in-house by MDPI AG to power mdpi-ror-search, an open-source tool that matches affiliation strings against the Research Organization Registry (ROR).
Model description
Architecture: Fine-tuned from SIRIS-Lab/affilgood-affilxlm (AffilXLM), an XLM-RoBERTa base model (12 layers, 768 hidden size, ~270M parameters) further pre-trained with masked language modeling on 10 million OpenAlex affiliation strings (Duran-Silva et al., 2024)
Task: Named Entity Recognition (NER) over affiliation / address strings
SUB: sub-organization / department, faculty, institute, lab
CITY: city
COUNTRY: country
Language: multilingual affiliation strings with a bias toward Latin-script, English-structured affiliation conventions
License: Apache 2.0
Intended use
This model is designed to extract structured entities from free-text author affiliation strings as found in scholarly manuscripts and metadata (e.g. "Dept. of Physics, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland"). It is the first stage in a pipeline whose downstream goal is to resolve affiliations to ROR IDs. For further details about the pipeline, visit mdpi-ror-search.
It is not intended for general-purpose NER on arbitrary text (news, social media, etc.) as it is specialized for the affiliation/address domain.
How to use
The model works out of the box with the transformerstoken-classification pipeline using aggregation_strategy="simple", which merges wordpiece tokens into full entity spans.
For production use, filter low-confidence predictions with a score threshold (e.g. score >= 0.65) before downstream processing.
Training data
The model was fine-tuned on an internal, proprietary dataset of affiliation strings annotated for ORG, SUB, CITY, and COUNTRY spans. This dataset is not publicly released.
Evaluation
Evaluated with seqeval on the held-out test split (strict span matching):
Entity
Precision
Recall
F1
ORG
85.5
87.9
86.6
SUB
87.1
89.6
88.3
CITY
94.7
95.8
95.2
COUNTRY
97.8
98.8
98.3
Overall
90.5
92.3
91.4
Limitations and bias
Trained on scholarly affiliation strings; performance may degrade on out-of-domain text.
Street addresses, postal codes, and regions are not labeled and will typically be tagged O (e.g. MA in "Cambridge, MA, USA").
The data is multilingual in organization and place names, but still skewed toward Latin-script, English-structured affiliation conventions; performance on affiliations written entirely in non-Latin scripts is not guaranteed.
The training dataset is not publicly released, so exact reproduction of the reported metrics is not possible from this card alone.
Ambiguous or heavily abbreviated affiliation strings (e.g. bare acronyms) may be mislabeled or missed; downstream consumers should apply a confidence threshold and treat predictions as candidates rather than ground truth.
With aggregation_strategy="simple", hyphenated compound organization names (e.g. CREAF-CSIC-UAB) can be split into multiple adjacent ORG spans rather than merged into one, since the tokenizer treats - as a token boundary. Downstream consumers may want to re-merge adjacent same-label spans separated only by punctuation.
Citation: If you use this model, please cite it as:
bibtex
1@misc{orggeoner,
2 title = {org-geo-ner: A Named Entity Recognition Model for Affiliation Parsing},
3 author = {MDPI AG},
4 year = {2026},
5 howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/mdpi-ai/org-geo-ner}}
6}
78@inproceedings{duran-silva-etal-2024-affilgood,
9 title = {{A}ffil{G}ood: Building reliable institution name disambiguation tools to improve scientific literature analysis},
10 author = {Duran-Silva, Nicolau and Accuosto, Pablo and Przyby{\l}a, Piotr and Saggion, Horacio},
11 booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (SDP 2024)},
12 year = {2024},
13 address = {Bangkok, Thailand},
14 publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
15 url = {https://aclanthology.org/2024.sdp-1.13},
16 pages = {135--144}
17}
Disclaimer
This model is provided as-is, without warranty of any kind. Predictions should be reviewed before being used in contexts requiring high accuracy, such as automated compliance or reporting workflows.