This is a standard GPTQ-v1 W4A16 checkpoint of
Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base.
I quantized 150 language-tower matrices with symmetric 4-bit signed codes and
group size 128. The visual tower and other non-target tensors remain at their
original precision.
The only experimental change from the matched AbsMax control is the stored
group-scale policy. CliffQuant chooses the positive finite FP16 scale that
exactly minimizes the worst separately normalized calibration-environment
weighted reconstruction error.
Experiment 001 evaluates 64 windows and 16,320 target tokens per environment.
Negative deltas favor CliffQuant.
Held-out environment
AbsMax NLL
CliffQuant NLL
CliffQuant - AbsMax
Macro mean
2.555326
2.500527
-0.054799
General
3.473953
3.410937
-0.063016
Code
1.513257
1.454046
-0.059211
Math
1.631195
1.613147
-0.018048
Multilingual
3.602898
3.523977
-0.078921
The frozen release gate allowed at most +0.01 macro NLL regression and
+0.02 in any environment. Both gates passed, and all four environments
improved.
The held-out reconstruction proxy also passed on 4,096 groups from all 150
target matrices:
Scale policy
Module-macro worst-environment weighted MSE
CliffQuant minimax
0.0002711874
Pooled-WMSE
0.0002740030
AbsMax
0.0003770210
Held-out reconstruction proxy
Quantization configuration
Field
Value
Base model
Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base
Base revision
dc7cdfe2ee4154fa7e30f5b51ca41bfa40174e68
Format
GPTQ v1
Target weights
150 language-tower linear matrices
Weight bits
4
Activation precision
16-bit model runtime
Group size
128
Symmetric
yes
Activation ordering
no (desc_act=false)
Stored scale
positive finite IEEE binary16
Scale objective
exact four-environment minimax weighted MSE
GPTQModel revision
581bfd970b8b67372ed61b0ef449d88f5388d196
CliffQuant changes scale selection, not the packed inference format. No custom
kernel is required.
The environment line keeps the portable GPTQ_TORCH path usable on Windows
without Triton; remove it if your TorchInductor/Triton setup is working. This
exact eager path was exercised against the released checkpoint.
This is a quantized base model, not an instruction-tuned assistant. The
upstream model card describes it as intended for fine-tuning, in-context
learning experiments, and research or development rather than direct
interaction.
Verification
10,000 / 10,000 exact solver comparisons matched exhaustive FP16
enumeration with zero mismatches.
The full CliffQuant scale run completed all 3,883,008 W4/G128 groups.
In 114 groups (0.0029%), a direct-candidate objective tie triggered
conservative exhaustive-grid verification.
Independent unpacking checked 150 module-buffer sets and 497,025,024
signed codes.
All 338 non-target tensors remained byte-exact, with zero dense target
weights left behind.
Every target module's qweight and scales payload differs from the matched
AbsMax checkpoint.
A fresh empty-directory installation passed deterministic text and image-text
generation twice.
The fail-closed publication builder independently reloaded both checkpoints,
reran held-out NLL, replayed the frozen corpora, recomputed the proxy and
bootstrap gates, and regenerated the figures before release.
The checkpoint itself was built from CliffQuant commit
d176c4944962d0bcd43a8092059fbf5098653bc6; later publication work does not
retroactively change that build provenance.
Calibration and evaluation data
No fine-tuning or additional model training was performed. Pinned dataset
revisions were used only to construct deterministic calibration and held-out
text windows:
general: WikiText-2 raw train / validation;
code: MBPP train / validation and test;
math: GSM8K train / test; and
multilingual: XNLI train / validation.
Calibration contains 128 total 256-token windows. Held-out evaluation contains
256 disjoint 256-token windows, split equally across the four environments.
The repository records the exact revisions, row identities, rendered-text
hashes, token-window hashes, and zero-overlap checks.
Limitations and claim boundary
This is one experiment on one base-model size, one quantization format, and one
frozen corpus construction. The positive proxy and NLL results do not establish
novelty, state of the art, downstream-task accuracy, latency gains, or broad
generalization.
Exact breakpoint-based scale optimization already has prior art. CliffQuant's
candidate distinction is the exact minimax objective over separately normalized
calibration environments, not exact scale optimization by itself. See the
prior-art review
and
claim boundary.
License and attribution
The checkpoint and CliffQuant code are released under Apache-2.0. The base model
is also Apache-2.0; retain the upstream Qwen attribution and review its model
card before use.
If the method or evidence pipeline helps your work, citation metadata is
available in the repository's
CITATION.cff.