This repository houses the Helium 6B models, specifically designed to compare sequential pretraining on temporally ordered data against standard shuffled pretraining. This research aims to understand how the order of data affects a model's ability to retain facts and minimize chronological confusion.
The sequential variant is engineered to improve factuality on recent knowledge. To support this research, we developed:
KairosQA: A benchmark of 7,000+ temporally grounded questions.
Kairos Evaluation Code: Tools to analyze how models associate facts with specific time periods.
Out-of-Scope Use
Instruction Following: These are base models and have not undergone SFT or RLHF. They will not respond well to direct prompts or "chat" style interactions without further tuning.
Multilingual: The model should not be used in other languages than the ones on which it was trained.
Malicious Intent: Any illegal or harmful activity is strictly prohibited.
Bias, Risks, and Limitations
Helium 6B is a base model and has not been aligned with human preferences.
Content: It may generate biased, incorrect, or harmful content.
Recommendation: Do not use for downstream applications without rigorous alignment (SFT/RLHF) and risk mitigation.
The list of available checkpoints is disclosed below:
Subfolder
N. Tokens
Cut-Off date
Min. date
Shuffled ?
Main ("")
2.5T
2025
2018
no
sequential_2024*
2.2T
2024
2018
no
sequential_2023*
1.9T
2023
2018
no
sequential_2022*
1.6T
2022
2018
no
sequential_2021*
1.2T
2021
2018
no
sequential_2020*
0.9T
2020
2018
no
shuffle_eq_2020
0.9T
2024
2020
yes
shuffle_eq_2024
2.2T
2024
2020
yes
shuffle_eq_2025
2.5T
2024
2020
yes
*Note on Non-Cooldown Variants: For these specific checkpoints, we can also provide "non-cooldown" counterparts. These are extracted directly from the training process at the equivalent token count without applying a learning rate decay (cooldown phase).
Training Details
Training Data
Helium 6B checkpoints were trained on data from Common Crawl, which was preprocessed with the dactory library.
Evaluation
Testing Data
While our models are primarily designed to facilitate research on LLM temporality and base model dynamics—which may result in lower general performance compared to state-of-the-art models—we nonetheless evaluated them using the OLMES benchmark. This evaluation covers MMLU, ARC (Easy & Challenge), OpenBookQA, CommonSenseQA, PIQA, SIQA, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, and BoolQA.
Helium 6B models are licensed under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license.
Citations
If you use one of these models, please cite:
bibtex
1@misc{pilchen2026understandingdatatemporalityimpact,
2 title={Understanding Data Temporality Impact on Large Language Models Pre-training},
3 author={Hippolyte Pilchen and Romain Fabre and Franck Signe Talla and Patrick Perez and Edouard Grave},
4 year={2026},
5 eprint={2605.22769},
6 archivePrefix={arXiv},
7 primaryClass={cs.CL},
8 url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22769},
9}