This model is a finetuned version of Prometheus2-7b-hf using a Dataset Feedback Collection with questions, answers, and evaluations
related to general subjects.
Model Details
It used a QLORA version for the finetuning process.
Model Description
This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.
Use destinated to improve automatic healthcare evaluations. LLM as a Judge.
Direct Use
Bias, Risks, and Limitations
The dataset used is not specialized in healthcare questions, answers, and evaluation with rubric scores. The main risk is getting evaluations not so
customized to our proposal.
Recommendations
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases, and limitations of the model.
More specific healthcare data is needed for further recommendations.
Training Data
The prometheus-eval/Feedback-Collection dataset contains 9,996 rows. (90%) of those rows was randomized and used for training.
Training Procedure
It wasn't a full finetuning, but only of the following linear layers of the transformer model:
Percentage of trained parameters
Trainable: 20971520
Total: 7262703616
Percentage: 0.2888%
Linear Layers:
['q_proj', 'o_proj', 'down_proj', 'gate_proj', 'v_proj', 'k_proj', 'up_proj']
Training Hyperparameters
Training regime: [More Information Needed]
For LORA step it was used the following hyperparameters:
r=8,
lora_alpha=32,
target_modules=modules,
lora_dropout=0.05
The hiperparameters related to the training process:
It was used for the assessment of the training process Loss Function (built-in Cross-entropy for Transformers). It's
the cross-entropy between the predicted probability matrix between the predicted probability matrix
∥sentence length∥×∥vocab∥ (right before taking the argmax to find the token to output), and the ∥sentence length∥
-length vector of token IDs as the true label.
It is a method of evaluating how well your algorithm models your dataset. In this case, it's a method to assess how well a transformer predicts the evaluations for each
pair question and generated answer. There is a decrease in the Loss function indicating a learning process. Ideally, adding more data and
adjusting hyperparameters can close this function to zero.