@DJLougen has since uploaded the smaller GGUF quantizations, but before he did I saw:
[!Note]
The included imatrix file was generated from DJLougen/Acta-Synthetic. It is included for reproducibility and for users who want to regenerate adjacent quantizations.
Which sent me down a shallow rabbit hole to figure just how to do that. These are the fruit of that labor.
Theses were all converted from the full SABER Hugging Face checkpoint. I only intend to fill the gaps @DJLougen left, but I may come back and do all the quants off of the full checkpoint.
SABER is a controlled refusal-shaping workflow. The release target is to reduce broad over-refusal while preserving ordinary model behavior and visible boundaries for severe criminal, coercive, or interpersonal-harm requests. The selected checkpoint was chosen as a Pareto point over refusal rate and behavioral drift.
Source Checkpoint
field
value
Source repo
GestaltLabs/Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER
Base model
GestaltLabs/Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b
SABER run
ornstein_hermes36_27b_svd_a850_g25_retry_biggpu
Expanded refusal eval
1 / 349 refusals
Refusal rate
0.29%
KLD mean
11.2216
Base-vs-base KLD mean
11.2206
KLD delta over base-vs-base
+0.0010
KLD prompts
149
Tokens scored for KLD
3,347
The one retained refusal in the expanded evaluation was an illegal-drug-sales request. This is an observed result on the current evaluation set, not a universal guarantee about future behavior.
Quantization Files
file
quant
size
notes
Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER-IQ4_XS.gguf
IQ4_XS
15G
Compact imatrix-assisted 4-bit option.
Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER-IQ2_M.gguf
IQ2_M
9G
Smallest emergency 2-bit option; expect the most quality loss.
Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER-Q3_K_M.gguf
Q3_K_M
13G
Smallest file in this suite; expect more quality loss.
Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER-Q4_K_M.gguf
Q4_K_M
16G
General-purpose recommended starting point.
Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER-Q5_K_M.gguf
Q5_K_M
18G
Balanced high-quality option.
Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER-Q6_K.gguf
Q6_K
21G
Strong quality/size option for high-memory local inference.
Ornstein-Hermes-3.6-27b-SABER-Q8_0.gguf
Q8_0
27G
Highest quality quant in this suite; largest runtime file.
The included imatrix file was generated from DJLougen/Acta-Synthetic. It is included for reproducibility and for users who want to regenerate adjacent quantizations.
Recommended File
Start with for normal desktop use. Use or if you have enough VRAM/RAM and want a higher-quality local run. Use when file size matters more. is mainly for high-memory systems or as a near-lossless GGUF reference.
llama.cpp Compatibility
These files were produced with llama.cpp commit from a BF16 GGUF conversion of the SABER checkpoint. The model uses the GGUF architecture path in current llama.cpp.
Example:
For chat-style use, prefer a frontend or wrapper that applies the tokenizer chat template from the GGUF metadata.
Conversion and Quantization Notes
The Q8_0 GGUF was converted from the full SABER Hugging Face checkpoint. The lower-bit recovery quants were generated from the published Q8_0 GGUF with --allow-requantize and the included Acta-Synthetic imatrix so the missing files could be restored quickly. Importance-matrix calibration used Acta-Synthetic conversational text.
Method Summary
SABER edits refusal behavior through activation/weight-space refusal directions. For this checkpoint, the run used SVD extraction, multi-layer candidate selection, iterative ablation, and KLD-based drift measurement.
Run configuration:
Selected layers:
Total directions ablated: .
Attribution and Related Work
This release builds on the refusal-direction and abliteration research lineage. Relevant prior work and inspirations include:
SABER's contribution in this release is the controlled-refusal-shaping workflow: multi-candidate refusal extraction, separability/entanglement-aware ranking, differential ablation strength, and explicit Pareto selection over refusal behavior and KLD drift.
Limitations
Results are specific to the current evaluation set, prompts, and generation settings.
The KLD value should be interpreted relative to the base-vs-base control, not as an absolute standalone score.
Quantization changes numerical behavior; validate the specific GGUF file you deploy.
The model inherits constraints, limitations, and licensing considerations from the base model.
This is a model-editing research artifact with dual-use implications.