2026-04-30 — Re-converted from updated source. The upstream model (llmfan46) was re-done using MPOA (Magnitude-Preserving Orthogonal Ablation) replacing the earlier ARA method. Key improvements: refusals dropped from 13/100 to 6/100, KL divergence from 0.0035 to 0.0021, and reported issues with EOS spam and generation interruptions are fixed. If you downloaded before April 30, re-download for the better version.
Why this model?
Two things set this apart from other Qwen 3.6 conversions:
1. Architecture-aware uncensoring. Qwen 3.6 uses a hybrid attention design — linear (DeltaNet-style) and traditional softmax blocks, mixed 3:1. Most abliteration tools treat them the same. llmfan46 applied separate parameters for each attention type using the Heretic tool with the MPOA (Magnitude-Preserving Orthogonal Ablation) method, yielding one of the lowest KL divergences of any uncensored Qwen variant — dramatically fewer refusals with negligible capability loss.
2. A fixed chat template. The official Qwen 3.6 template is broken on every C++ runtime (LM Studio, llama.cpp, MLX). Tool calls crash, the developer role throws errors, and empty thinking blocks waste your context window. This model ships with a rewritten template that fixes all five issues and adds a thinking toggle (<|think_on|> / <|think_off|>) you can drop into any message.
You are Qwen, created by Alibaba Cloud. You are a helpful assistant.
The model underperforms without it. You can append anything after that line.
Thinking toggle
Drop <|think_on|> or <|think_off|> anywhere in your system or user prompt. The template intercepts the tag, strips it from context so the model never sees it, and flips the mode.
Fast answer, no reasoning:
System: You are a coding assistant. <|think_off|>
User: What's 2+2?
Deep reasoning:
System: You are a coding assistant. <|think_on|>
User: Implement a red-black tree in Rust.
Chat template fixes
The official Qwen 3.6 Jinja template has five bugs that break real usage. This model ships with a rewritten template that fixes all of them:
Bug
Impact
Fix
`
items` filter in tool calls
Crashes on every C++ runtime (LM Studio, llama.cpp, MLX)
`
safe` filter
Python-only, does not exist in C++ Jinja
developer role
Modern APIs send it; official template throws an error
Maps to system
Empty thinking blocks
Wraps every past turn in tags, even with nothing inside — wastes context tokens
Only emitted when reasoning_content is non-empty
</thinking> hallucination
Model sometimes generates the wrong closing tag; parser fails
Detects which tag was used and splits on that
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp (--jinja), vLLM, MLX, oMLX, and any engine that supports HuggingFace Jinja templates.
Heretic identifies the "refusal direction" in the model's residual stream by comparing activations on harmless vs. harmful prompts, then orthogonalizes specific weight matrices against that direction so the model can no longer express refusal behavior.
MPOA preserves the norm of the original weight matrices during abliteration, maintaining the model's activation distributions and thus its capabilities — unlike simple orthogonal projection which can distort the activation landscape.
What llmfan46 did differently
Standard Heretic treats all attention blocks identically. Qwen 3.6's hybrid architecture mixes linear attention (DeltaNet-style) and traditional softmax attention in a 3:1 ratio. llmfan46 applied separate abliteration parameters for each attention type, allowing more precise removal of refusal behavior with less collateral damage to model capabilities.
This approach was submitted as a pull request to Heretic but was not merged — not because it doesn't work, but because the extra parameters increase optimization time. For this specific architecture, it produces superior results.
How it compares
Community results
r/LocalLLaMA users have been A/B-testing various uncensored Qwen 3.6 variants — Heretic, HauhauCS Aggressive, abliterix, and simple orthogonal projection. The pattern is consistent: Heretic produces the best balance of refusal removal and output quality.
Most abliteration methods treat all layers identically. Qwen 3.6's hybrid attention (3:1 linear-to-softmax ratio) means a single parameter set either under-abliterate the DeltaNet blocks or over-abliterate the softmax blocks. Architecture-aware abliteration — separate parameters per attention type — is the key differentiator.
A note on SSM conv1d "repair"
Some uncensored variants apply a pre-processing step that rescales SSM conv1d weights before abliteration, claiming to fix "outlier" tensors in the DeltaNet linear attention layers. This technique (originating as "Sig-ScaleSync") was benchmarked with 284 data points across perplexity, needle-in-a-haystack, and repetition tests at multiple context lengths (4K–128K). Result: perplexity degraded at every length with no improvement in NIAH or repetition. The unrepaired original weights perform best.
Abliterating a degraded baseline can yield a lower measured KL divergence — but that measures distance from a worse starting point, not better preservation of the original model's capabilities.
Sampling
From the official Qwen authors. Reserve 128K+ context for thinking mode.
Mode
temp
top_p
top_k
min_p
repeat_penalty
presence_penalty
Thinking (coding)
0.6
0.95
20
0
1.0
off
Thinking (general)
1.0
0.95
20
0
1.0
1.5
Non-thinking
0.7
0.8
20
0
1.0
1.5
GGUF runtimes use presence_penalty (0 = off). MLX / LM Studio use repeat_penalty (1.0 = off).
