Qwen3.5-4B-VL fine-tuned (SFT, 1 epoch) on
davanstrien/iconclass-vlm-brillfull
— the full-label iconclass dataset (~4.36 codes/image vs the truncated 3.54).
Why this model exists (research finding)
Built to test whether fixing truncated training labels lifts the iconclass classifier
past its ~25% recall ceiling. It does not: training converged well (eval_loss 0.47), but
on the clean 788-image full-label test it scores H-F1 45.3 / hier-recall 46.4 /
code-recall 25.6 — recall unchanged vs models trained on truncated labels.
Conclusion: the 4B is capability-bound (identifying the right codes), not label-bound —
neither reward tuning nor label completeness moves it.
The approach that did improve results is anchored fusion: use this model as a precision
anchor, then a graded VLM-judge gates in extra codes from semantic retrieval. On the same
clean test that lifts results to H-F1 47.5 / hier-recall 57.6, with zero extra
training.
Base: unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-Base
Recommended use: as the anchor in the anchored-fusion pipeline (best recall).