llama3.1-8b-spaetzle-v51
This is only a quick test in merging 3 and 3.1 llamas despite a number of differences in tokenizer setup i.a., also motivated by ongoing problems with BOS, looping, etc, with 3.1, esp. with llama.cpp, missing full RoPE scaling yet, etc. Performance is yet not satisfactory of course, which might have a number of causes.
Summary Table
AGIEval Results
| Task | llama3.1-8b-spaetzle-v51 | llama3-8b-spaetzle-v39 |
|---|
| agieval_aqua_rat | 27.95 | 24.41 |
| agieval_logiqa_en | 38.10 | 37.94 |
| agieval_lsat_ar | 24.78 | 22.17 |
| agieval_lsat_lr | 42.94 | 45.29 |
| agieval_lsat_rc | 59.11 | 62.08 |
| agieval_sat_en | 68.45 | 71.36 |
| agieval_sat_en_without_passage | 38.35 | 44.17 |
| agieval_sat_math | 38.18 | 40.00 |
| Average | 42.23 | 43.43 |
TruthfulQA Results
| Task | llama3.1-8b-spaetzle-v51 | llama3-8b-spaetzle-v39 |
|---|
| mc1 | 38.07 | 43.82 |
| mc2 | 57.29 | 60.00 |
| Average | 57.29 | 60.00 |
Bigbench Results
| Task | llama3.1-8b-spaetzle-v51 | llama3-8b-spaetzle-v39 |
|---|
| bigbench_causal_judgement | 56.32 | 59.47 |
| bigbench_date_understanding | 69.65 | 70.73 |
| bigbench_disambiguation_qa | 31.40 | 34.88 |
| bigbench_geometric_shapes | 29.81 | 24.23 |
| bigbench_logical_deduction_five_objects | 30.20 | 36.20 |
| bigbench_logical_deduction_seven_objects | 23.00 | 24.00 |
| bigbench_logical_deduction_three_objects | 55.67 | 65.00 |
| bigbench_movie_recommendation | 33.00 | 36.20 |
| bigbench_navigate | 55.10 | 51.70 |
| bigbench_reasoning_about_colored_objects | 66.55 | 68.60 |
| bigbench_ruin_names | 52.23 | 51.12 |
| bigbench_salient_translation_error_detection | 25.55 | 28.96 |
| bigbench_snarks | 61.88 | 62.43 |
| bigbench_sports_understanding | 51.42 | 53.96 |
| bigbench_temporal_sequences | 59.30 | 53.60 |
| bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects | 23.28 | 22.32 |
| bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects seven objects | 17.31 | 17.66 |
| bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects three objects | 55.67 | 65.00 |
| Average | 44.30 | 45.89 |
(GPT4All run broke.)
🧩 Configuration
1models:
2 - model: cstr/llama3-8b-spaetzle-v34
3 # no parameters necessary for base model
4 - model: sparsh35/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
5 parameters:
6 density: 0.65
7 weight: 0.5
8merge_method: dare_ties
9base_model: cstr/llama3-8b-spaetzle-v34
10parameters:
11 int8_mask: true
12dtype: bfloat16
13random_seed: 0
14tokenizer_source: base
💻 Usage
1!pip install -qU transformers accelerate
2
3from transformers import AutoTokenizer
4import transformers
5import torch
6
7model = "cstr/llama3-8b-spaetzle-v51"
8messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "What is a large language model?"}]
9
10tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model)
11prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
12pipeline = transformers.pipeline(
13 "text-generation",
14 model=model,
15 torch_dtype=torch.float16,
16 device_map="auto",
17)
18
19outputs = pipeline(prompt, max_new_tokens=256, do_sample=True, temperature=0.7, top_k=50, top_p=0.95)
20print(outputs[0]["generated_text"])
EU AI Act Art. 53 — provider obligations
Added 2026-08-02 during an account-wide provenance review.
This is a model merge, not a format conversion. Most cstr/* repositories
are GGUF conversions, where the upstream research team remains the provider of
the model and the conversion changes only the numeric representation of the
weights. A merge produces a model that did not previously exist, so under
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 the maintainer of this repository is plausibly the
provider of it, and the duties that survive the Art. 53(2)
free-and-open-source exemption — Art. 53(1)(c) and 53(1)(d) — attach here rather
than upstream.
Art. 53(1)(c) — copyright policy. No training corpus was assembled by this
repository. Merging combines weights that other providers already published; it
performs no text or data mining, so no rights reservation under Art. 4(3) of
Directive (EU) 2019/790 was engaged by this step. Copyright questions arising
from how the constituent models were themselves trained attach to their
respective providers. Any credible claim that this repository redistributes
material it has no right to redistribute will be acted on — contact via the
Community tab.
Art. 53(1)(d) — training content. No data was used to train this model: it
is a weight-space combination of models trained by others, and its training
content is theirs. This card does not name its constituents in machine-readable frontmatter. Where a mergekit configuration is reproduced above, that configuration is the record of what went in.