We introduce Tri-21B, our flagship large language model that redefines the efficiency frontier in LLM training. By achieving state-of-the-art performance with only 2.3T training tokens, we demonstrate that exceptional capabilities don't require excessive computational resources.
Average Performance vs. Approximate Training FLOPs
Key Highlights
Unprecedented Training Efficiency: Trained on just 2.3T tokens—significantly less than comparable models—while achieving 70.3% average accuracy across MMLU/KMMLU/Global MMLU benchmarks
Pushing the Pareto Frontier: With only 2.95E+23 FLOPs, Tri-21B outperforms models requiring 2-10x more compute, setting a new standard for efficient scaling
Enhanced Reasoning: Modified training dataset mixture specifically optimized for reasoning capabilities
Advanced Post-Training: Significantly improved RL training pipeline focusing on mathematical reasoning and everyday usage
Multi-lingual: Specially optimized for Korean, English, and Japanese.
Our Tri-21B represents a paradigm shift in efficient model development. When comparing performance to training FLOPs, our model dramatically pushes the Pareto frontier—achieving performance comparable to or exceeding models like Qwen2.5-32B (74.6% at 3.46E+24 FLOPs) and Gemma 3 IT 27B (67.6% at 2.27E+24 FLOPs) while using approximately 8-12x fewer computational resources.
Model Specifications
Tri-21B
Type: Causal Language Model
Training Stage: Pre-training & Post-training
Architecture: Transformer Decoder with RoPE, SwiGLU, RMSNorm, and GQA
Number of Parameters: 20.73B
Number of Layers: 32
Number of Attention Heads: 32 (Query) / 8 (Key, Value)
Context Length: 8,192
Number of Tokens Seen: 2.3T
Vocab Size: 124,416
Training Efficiency Analysis
Our approach to training efficiency sets new benchmarks in the field. The following comparison demonstrates how Tri-21B achieves superior performance per FLOP compared to other state-of-the-art models of similar scale:
Model
FLOPs
Avg. Accuracy¹
Efficiency Ratio²
Tri-21B
2.95E+23
70.3%
1.00x (baseline)
Gemma2-9b
4.42E+23
61.5%
0.48x
Qwen2.5-7B
8.22E+23
63.4%
0.29x
Exaone-3.5-32B
1.25E+24
58.5%
0.19x
Gemma 3 IT 27B
2.27E+24
67.6%
0.11x
Qwen2.5-32B
3.46E+24
74.6%
0.10x
Qwen3-32B
5.77E+24
73.5%
0.06x
¹ Average of MMLU / KMMLU / Global MMLU (ja)
² Performance per FLOP relative to Tri-21B
This efficiency breakthrough enables organizations to deploy state-of-the-art language models without the traditional computational barriers, democratizing access to advanced AI capabilities.
Quickstart
Here is a code snippet with apply_chat_template that demonstrates how to load the tokenizer and model and generate text.
We evaluated Tri-21B across a comprehensive suite of benchmarks assessing general reasoning, knowledge recall, coding abilities, mathematical reasoning, and instruction-following capabilities. We compare our model against state-of-the-art models of similar scale: Gemmma-3-IT-27B and Qwen3-32B to demonstrate its competitive performance.
Full evaluation settings
# Benchmark Evaluation Settings
Benchmark
Language
Evaluation Setting
Metric
General Reasoning and Factuality
• HellaSwag
English
0-shot
accuracy
• ARC:C
English
0-shot
accuracy
• HAERAE
Korean
3-shot
accuracy
• CLIcK
Korean
0-shot
accuracy
• KoBEST
Korean
5-shot
accuracy
Knowledge and Reasoning
• KMMLU
Korean
5-shot (0-shot, CoT)
accuracy (exact-match)
• MMLU
English
5-shot (0-shot, CoT)
accuracy (exact-match)
• MMLU-Pro
English
0-shot, CoT
exact-match
• Global-MMLU-Lite-ja
Japaneses
5-shot
accuracy
Coding
• HumanEval
English
0-shot
pass@1
• MBPPPlus
English
0-shot
pass@1
Mathematical Reasoning
• GSM8k
English
0-shot, CoT
exact-match
• MATH
English
0-shot, CoT
exact-match
• GPQA
English
4-shot
accuracy
• GPQA Diamond
English
0-shot, CoT
accuracy
• HRM8k
Korean
0-shot, CoT
exact-match
Instruction Following and Chat
• IFEval
English
0-shot
strict-average
• koIFEval
Korean
0-shot
strict-average
• MT-Bench
English
LLM-as-a-judge (gpt-4o)
LLM score
• KO-MT-Bench
Korean
LLM-as-a-judge (gpt-4o)
LLM score
• systemIFEval
English
0-shot
strict-average
*Note that koIFEval, systemIFEval, and KoRuler are our in-house evaluation benchmarks adapted for Korean to better assess model capabilities in Korean language tasks.
**Note that MT-Bench, KO-MT-Bench, and LogicKor use a 10-point scale.
Benchmark Results
Models compared:
Tri-21B: Our flagship 21B parameter model
Qwen3-32B: Qwen's 32B parameter model
Gemma3-IT-27B: Google's Gemma 3 instruction-tuned 27B model
General Reasoning and Factuality
Benchmark
Tri-21B
Qwen3-32B
Gemma3-IT-27B
HAERAE
86.16
71.67
78.09
KoBEST
85.92
83.39
87.66
CLIcK
72.32
66.89
67.54
KMMLU
61.89 (69.90)
61.73 (67.55)
55.03 (60.61)
MMLU
77.62 (85.02)
81.86 (84.46)
77.42 (84.09)
MMLU-Pro
64.74
70.53
64.26
Global-MMLU-Lite-ja
70.25
77.00
72.00
Coding
Benchmark
Tri-21B
Qwen3-32B
Gemma3-IT-27B
HumanEval
75.61
74.39
87.80
MBPPPlus
73.02
74.40
84.92
Mathematical Reasoning
Benchmark
Tri-21B
Qwen3-32B
Gemma3-IT-27B
GSM8k
87.95
86.66
90.52
MATH
77.60
81.40
85.00
GPQA
39.73
41.07
37.95
GPQA-Diamond
44.95
54.04
44.44
HRM8k
56.70
66.24
63.90
Instruction Following and Chat
Benchmark
Tri-21B
Qwen3-32B
Gemma3-IT-27B
IFEval
80.75
86.08
80.78
koIFEval
66.51
62.93
69.24
MT-Bench
8.21
8.52
8.53
KO-MT-Bench
7.79
8.47
8.46
systemIFEval
77.40
77.92
77.94
Base Model Evaluation
The following table shows the performance of Tri-21B base model (before instruction tuning) on key benchmarks:
Benchmark
Tri-21B Base
MMLU
76.99
KMMLU
62.37
KoBEST
85.07
BBH
77.19
GSM8K
70.36
MBPPPlus
75.40
Limitations
Language Support: The models are optimized for English, Korean, and Japanese. Usage with other languages may result in degraded performance.
Knowledge Cutoff: The model's information is limited to data available up to Febuary, 2025.
License
This model repository is licensed under the Trillion License.