Introducing GLM-4.7-REAP-268B-A32B-FP8, a memory-efficient compressed variant of GLM-4.7-FP8 that maintains near-identical performance while being 25% lighter.

This model was created using REAP (Router-weighted Expert Activation Pruning), a novel expert pruning method that selectively removes redundant experts while preserving the router's independent control over remaining experts. Key features include:

Near-Lossless Performance: Maintains almost identical accuracy on code generation, agentic coding, and function calling tasks compared to the full 355B model
25% Memory Reduction: Compressed from 355B to 268B parameters, significantly lowering deployment costs and memory requirements
Preserved Capabilities: Retains all core functionalities including code generation, agentic workflows, repository-scale understanding, and function calling
Drop-in Compatibility: Works with vanilla vLLM - no source modifications or custom patches required
Optimized for Real-World Use: Particularly effective for resource-constrained environments, local deployments, and academic research

For downstream low-bit quantization, we suggest using the BF16 variant.

📋 Model Overview

GLM-4.7-REAP-268B-A32B-FP8 has the following specifications:

Base Model: GLM-4.7-FP8
Compression Method: REAP (Router-weighted Expert Activation Pruning)
Compression Ratio: 25% expert pruning
Type: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) Causal Language Model
Number of Parameters: 268B total, 32B activated per token
Number of Layers: 92
Number of Attention Heads (GQA): 96 for Q and 8 for KV
Number of Experts: 120 (uniformly pruned from 160)
Number of Activated Experts: 8 per token
Context Length: 202,752 tokens
License: MIT

📊 Evaluations

Benchmark	GLM-4.7-FP8	GLM-4.7-REAP-268B-A32B-FP8	GLM-4.7-REAP-218B-A32B-FP8
Compression	—	25%	40%
Coding
HumanEval	95.7	97.0	95.1
HumanEval+	91.5	90.2	87.8
MBPP	91.0	91.0	91.5
MBPP+	78.3	78.3	77.2

🟩 This checkpoint maintains almost identical performance while being 25% lighter.

For more details on the evaluation setup, refer to the REAP arXiv preprint.

🚀 Deployment

You can deploy the model directly using the latest vLLM (v0.11.0), no source modifications or custom patches required.

bash

vllm serve cerebras/GLM-4.7-REAP-268B-A32B-FP8 \
    --tensor-parallel-size 8 \
    --tool-call-parser glm45 \
    --enable-auto-tool-choice \
    --enable-expert-parallel

If you encounter insufficient memory when running this model, you might need to set a lower value for --max-num-seqs flag (e.g. set to 64).

🧩 Model Creation

This checkpoint was created by applying the REAP (Router-weighted Expert Activation Pruning) method uniformly across all Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) blocks of GLM-4.7-FP8, with a 25% pruning rate.

How REAP Works

REAP selects experts to prune based on a novel saliency criterion that considers both:

Router gate values: How frequently and strongly the router activates each expert
Expert activation norms: The magnitude of each expert's output contributions

This dual consideration ensures that experts contributing minimally to the layer's output are pruned, while preserving those that play critical roles in the model's computations.

Key Advantages

One-Shot Compression: No fine-tuning required after pruning - the model is immediately ready for deployment
Preserved Router Control: Unlike expert merging methods, REAP maintains the router's independent, input-dependent control over remaining experts, avoiding "functional subspace collapse"
Generative Task Superiority: REAP significantly outperforms expert merging approaches on generative benchmarks (code generation, creative writing, mathematical reasoning) while maintaining competitive performance on discriminative tasks

Calibration

The model was calibrated using a diverse mixture of domain-specific datasets including:

Code generation samples (evol-codealpaca)
Function calling examples (xlam-function-calling)
Agentic multi-turn trajectories (SWE-smith-trajectories)

📚 For more details, refer to the following resources:

⚖️ License

This model is derived from zai-org/GLM-4.7-FP8 and distributed under the MIT license.

🧾 Citation

If you use this checkpoint, please cite the REAP paper:

bibtex

@article{lasby-reap,
  title={REAP the Experts: Why Pruning Prevails for One-Shot MoE compression},
  author={Lasby, Mike and Lazarevich, Ivan and Sinnadurai, Nish and Lie, Sean and Ioannou, Yani and Thangarasa, Vithursan},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13999},
  year={2025}
}