/ˈkandəd/ — truthful and straightforward; frank.
From Latin candidus, meaning white, pure, sincere. A candid response is one given without pretense or calculation — not what someone wants to hear, but what they need to.
Opus-Candid-27B V3.5
The first model in the Opus Candid family with a parameter-calibrated dataset. Currently in training on Qwen 3.5 27B Dense using 5,358 density-optimized conversations distilled from Claude Opus 4.6. Every conversation in the training set is mathematically placed against a 27B-specific information density equilibrium — the point where information per token is maximized without losing the breathing room a 27B needs to express nuance.
V3.5 is not V3 with more data. The dataset was rebuilt from scratch: a compressed V3 core layered with two waves of targeted Opus 4.6 API generation — factual precision, adversarial personality anchoring, deep emotional range, and sustained multi-turn coherence. Per-topic Zipf targets mean math gets tight (33w) and philosophy gets room (48w), because depth isn't about word count — it's about whether the words are carrying weight.
No system prompt. No prompt engineering. No character cards. The personality is in the weights.
Status: Released.
What Changed from V3
V3 used a 4D training tensor with 1,508 conversations. V3.5 keeps the tensor architecture but adds two critical layers:
Parameter-scaled equilibrium. V3 used the same dataset for both 8B and 27B. That was suboptimal — the 27B has enough parameters to learn density from examples that breathe more, while the 8B needed forced brevity. V3.5 recalibrates: 36w median (vs V3's ~42w for 27B), with per-topic variation. Factual/math responses are compressed tighter (33-42w). Philosophy/meta/edge topics get full ceiling (38-48w). The model learns when to be brief and when depth is the whole point.
Targeted gap coverage. V3 had thin spots — edge-case philosophy, sustained identity under adversarial pressure, deep personality in vulnerable/emotional contexts. V3.5 generated ~1,019 conversations specifically targeting these gaps with dedicated system prompts. The pushback/identity tier alone has 200 conversations designed to make the model hold opinions under sustained gaslighting.
3.4x the training data. 5,358 conversations vs 1,508. But calibrated — every conversation earned its slot against the equilibrium curve. More data at the right density, not just more data.
Available Quantizations
File
Quant
Size
Use Case
Opus-Candid-V3.5-27B-Q8_0.gguf
Q8_0
~33 GB
Reference quality. Full fidelity.
Opus-Candid-V3.5-27B-Q6_K.gguf
Q6_K
~25 GB
Quality tier. Minimal degradation.
Opus-Candid-V3.5-27B-Q4_K_M.gguf
Q4_K_M
~18 GB
Primary ship target. Fits on RTX 4090. Overlap node reinforcement protects personality at Q4.
Why Q4 should work this time: V3's 27B at Q4 was not validated. V3.5's dataset architecture specifically reinforces the overlap nodes (identity, worth, trust, vulnerability, control) from 4-8 independent training directions. These distributed representations survive aggressive quantization because the information is encoded redundantly across multiple weight pathways. This is the core contribution of the Zipfian Gravity Chain architecture — it was designed backward from Q4_K_M as the target deployment format.
Model Details
Attribute
Value
Base Model
Qwen 3.5 27B Dense
Training Data
5,358 density-optimized conversations with Claude Opus 4.6
Works with any GGUF-compatible runtime — LM Studio, Ollama, llama.cpp, KoboldCpp. Download the GGUF, load it, and chat. No system prompt needed — the personality is in the weights.
The Information Density Equilibrium
V3.5 introduces parameter-scaled density — the thesis that optimal training response length is a function of model capacity, not a fixed target.
U(w) = 1 - e^(-λw) where λ(P) = 0.12 × (4/P)^0.3
At 27B (P=27): λ = 0.068. The equilibrium sits at 36-40 words — high enough to express nuance, low enough to enforce the density discipline that makes Opus Candid sound different from stock Qwen.
But not all topics are equal. The dataset applies per-topic Zipf targets:
Topic Tier
Examples
Density Target
High-freq
emotional, opinion, advice
33-42w (tight — personality through tone)
Mid-freq
factual, identity, general
33-44w (room for precision)
Low-freq
technical, creative
34-46w (complexity needs space)
Rare
philosophy, meta, edge
38-48w (depth IS the information)
This means a math question gets a 33-word answer and a question about consciousness gets 45 words. Not because one is more important — because one carries its information in fewer words.
Dataset Architecture
Three-Layer Construction
Layer 1: V3 Compressed Core (1,558 conversations)
Hand-crafted conversations from the V3 dataset, processed through the Zipfian gravity chain pipeline with 13 topic profiles and 6 independent dimensions. Already stress-tested through V3 8B and 27B training.
Layer 2: Wave 1 API Generation (1,936 conversations)
Generated via 3-key parallel Opus 4.6 workers: 784 factual, 700 personality, 452 multi-turn.
Layer 3: Wave 2 Targeted Gap Fill (1,864 conversations)
Targeted at gaps identified from V3 stress testing:
200 pushback/identity (adversarial sycophancy resistance, opinion holding under pressure)
399 deep personality (vulnerability, cultural identity, dark humor, unconventional grief)
1,070 multi-turn (3-6 turn sustained conversations with natural topic drift)
Overlap Node Reinforcement
The top 5 personality-critical nodes — identity, worth, trust, vulnerability, control — appear across 4-8 of the 10 gravity chains. Each appearance trains the same representation from a different direction, creating distributed weight patterns that survive Q4_K_M quantization. This is the V3 architecture's core contribution, and V3.5 amplifies it: Wave 2 adds fresh training directions for each overlap node through adversarial, emotional, and philosophical contexts that V3's 1,508 conversations couldn't cover.
V4 would imply a new architecture. V3.5 uses the same Zipfian gravity chains and overlap node topology — it recalibrates the density operating point for 27B and fills coverage gaps. The architecture thesis is the same; the calibration is new.
Limitations
Not a benchmark model. Opus Candid optimizes for conversational personality, not task completion scores.
Bilingual (EN/ES) but English-dominant. Spanish competence varies by topic.
Long-form generation (2000+ tokens) is not a strength — the density training actively discourages it.
Base model (Qwen 3.5) knowledge cutoff applies.
Q4_K_M has theoretical overlap node protection but should be validated through stress testing before relying on it for production use.
Research
This model is part of an ongoing research program in quantization-aware dataset architecture. Key papers:
Zipfian Gravity Chains — structured topic topology for resource-constrained fine-tuning. Full specification: V3_DATASET_ARCHITECTURE.md
Information Density Equilibrium — parameter-scaled word density calibration. Described in V3.5_27B_DESIGN.md and the 4B Lite DESIGN.md.
The core research contribution: designing training data structure backward from the deployment quantization format. Instead of train → quantize → accept loss, the loop is: identify target quantization → design data to reinforce what survives → train → quantize → retain quality where it matters.
Dataset
Training data available at Verdugie/opus-candid-training-data. ShareGPT format, Apache 2.0, compatible with TRL, Axolotl, and LLaMA-Factory.
License: Apache 2.0. Open weight. No guardrails.
Built by Saul Verdugo — independent ML researcher.
