Views
No views yet
// FAILS debug marker rather than rely on it.paper/main.pdf
💾 Code + reproducibility: https://github.com/ozlabsai/VericodingEBM
📊 Training data: OzLabs/VericodingEBM-data| Measurement | Hybrid-Averse (this model) | Best frontier LLM |
|---|---|---|
| Per-line top-3 recall on Verus dev-test (n=609 FAILs) | 0.84 | 0.74 (Claude Opus 4.7) |
| Whole-impl discrimination AUROC | 0.78 | 0.91 (GPT-5.5) |
| Closed-loop CEGIS repair@1 (n=100) | 25% | 30% (LLM self-judged) |
adapter/ — LoRA adapter (PEFT format, rank 16, alpha 32, embed_lora_rank 8) for Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B-Instructhead.pt — per-line scoring head weights (small MLP over sentinel-token hidden states)scalar_head.pt — whole-impl attention-pool head weights// FAILS debug markers are stripped from the input (delta = −52pp). This is the result of the counterfactual-marker augmentation described in paper §B. The pre-audit Sentinel-Reliant checkpoint (not released here) shows the opposite regime — signal collapses without markers, exposing the leak that motivated this work.