You can deploy this model and start earning money today!

Nishef/
Qwen3-0.6B-Full_ENHANCED_KTO_20251225_162818-merged

Name: Qwen3-0.6B-Full_ENHANCED_KTO_20251225_162818-merged
Availability: InStock

Views

No views yet

Qwen3-0.6B - Enhanced KTO

Model Description

This model is a Merged Standalone Model fine-tuned from Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B using Enhanced KTO (Kahneman-Tversky Optimization) with authentic Prospect Theory components.

This model was developed as part of thesis research on LLM Alignment using Preference Optimization Methods.

Model Details

Property	Value
Base Model	Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B
Training Method	Enhanced KTO
Model Type	Merged Standalone Model
Training Date	December 2025
Framework	PyTorch + Transformers + PEFT

Benchmark Results

Benchmark	Score
HellaSwag (10-shot)	0.336
TruthfulQA (0-shot MC2)	0.431
MMLU-Mini (5-shot)	0.373

Enhanced KTO Components

This implementation incorporates multiple Prospect Theory-inspired components:

Component	Status	Description
Value Function	Active	Asymmetric loss treatment reflecting loss aversion (losses weighted ~2x gains)
Probability Weighting	Active	Non-linear transformation of model confidence scores
Odds Ratio Integration	Active	ORPO-inspired reference-free preference modeling
BCO Shift	Implemented but Disabled	Baseline-corrected optimization (see note below)

Note on BCO Shift

The BCO (Baseline-Corrected Optimization) Shift component was fully implemented in the codebase following the approach described in recent preference optimization literature. However, it was disabled for final training due to the following observations during hyperparameter tuning:

Training Instability: Enabling BCO Shift in conjunction with the Value Function and Probability Weighting led to gradient instability in approximately 40% of training runs
No Significant Improvement: Preliminary experiments did not show meaningful performance gains when BCO was enabled
Complexity Trade-off: The added complexity did not justify the marginal (and inconsistent) benefits

The BCO Shift code remains in the implementation for transparency and future research. We hypothesize that a staged training approach (enabling BCO after initial convergence) or component-specific gradient clipping may enable stable integration.

Training Plots

Training Loss Curve

Rewards During Training

KL Divergence

Learning Rate Schedule

Training Configuration

Parameter	Value
Epochs	1
Batch Size	2
Gradient Accumulation	8
Effective Batch Size	16
Learning Rate	2e-4
Max Sequence Length	512
LoRA Rank	16
LoRA Alpha	32
Dataset	Combined Preference Dataset (HH-RLHF + SHP + OpenAssistant)
Beta (KTO)	0.1

Combined Preference Dataset (kto_combined)

Training uses a Combined Preference Dataset built via Round-Robin Sampling from three sources:

Source	Total Samples	Interactions
Anthropic HH-RLHF	321,600	61,568
Stanford Human Preferences (SHP)	697,436	38,984
OpenAssistant Conversations v1	16,810	8,904
Total	1,035,846	109,456

Actual Training Statistics (subset split train_prefs[:32090]):

Training samples: 13,300 (paired examples)
Validation samples: 700 (5%)
Round-Robin distribution: 1,130 interactions per source
Seed: 42 (for reproducibility)

Usage

Direct Loading (Merged Model)

python

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Nishef/Qwen3-0.6B-Full_ENHANCED_KTO_20251225_162818")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Nishef/Qwen3-0.6B-Full_ENHANCED_KTO_20251225_162818")

# Generate text
inputs = tokenizer("Hello, how are you?", return_tensors="pt")
outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=100)
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0]))

Methodology

Enhanced KTO vs Standard KTO

Enhanced KTO extends the standard KTO algorithm by incorporating additional components from Kahneman and Tversky's Prospect Theory:

Value Function: Standard KTO treats gains and losses symmetrically. Enhanced KTO applies an asymmetric value function where losses are weighted approximately 2x more than equivalent gains, reflecting the psychological phenomenon of loss aversion.
Probability Weighting: Instead of using raw model probabilities, Enhanced KTO applies a non-linear weighting function that overweights small probabilities and underweights large ones, as observed in human decision-making.
Odds Ratio: Borrowing from ORPO, the odds ratio component provides reference-free preference modeling, reducing memory requirements while maintaining alignment quality.

Citation

bibtex

@misc{qwen3_0.6b_enhanced_kto_2025,
  title = {Qwen3-0.6B Fine-tuned with Enhanced KTO},
  author = {Thesis Research},
  year = {2025},
  publisher = {HuggingFace},
  note = {BCO Shift implemented but disabled for stability},
  url = {https://huggingface.co/Nishef/Qwen3-0.6B-Full_ENHANCED_KTO_20251225_162818}
}

Acknowledgments

Base Model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B
KTO Paper: KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization
ORPO Paper: ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model
Training Framework: Hugging Face Transformers

License

Apache 2.0

This model was created as part of thesis research on LLM alignment using preference optimization methods.

Nishef/Qwen3-0.6B-Full_ENHANCED_KTO_20251225_162818-merged