Unslopper-30B-A3B is a fine-tuned language model designed to transform AI-generated text into more human-like prose while preserving semantic content. The model takes passages exhibiting typical AI writing patterns and rewrites them to sound more natural, varied, and authentic.
Base Model: Qwen3-VL-Text-30B-A3B-Instruct (6-bit quantized)
Architecture: Mixture of Experts (MoE) with 30B total parameters, 3B active
Fine-tuning Method: LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
Framework: MLX (Apple Silicon optimized)
Intended Use
The model is intended to:
Improve the naturalness of AI-generated creative writing
Reduce detectable AI patterns in text (stylistic homogeneity, predictable phrasing)
Serve as a post-processing step for AI writing assistants
Not intended for: Bypassing AI detection for academic dishonesty, fraud, or deceptive purposes.
Prompt Template
Use the default jinja template with the user prompt:
"Rewrite this AI passage to sound more humanlike:\n{passage}"
Essentially:
prompt = f"Rewrite this AI passage to sound more humanlike:\n{passage}"
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
Training Data
Data Generation Pipeline
The training data was synthetically generated using a novel "reverse distillation" approach:
Source: Human-written literary passages extracted from a Sam Paech preference dataset sourced from Project Gutenberg.
AI-ification Process: Each human passage was iteratively rewritten 10 times by GPT-4o-mini, progressively amplifying AI-typical writing patterns
Pair Creation: Final pairs consist of (AI-refined passage → original human passage)
This creates a supervised learning signal where the model learns to reverse the AI-ification process. The full dataset can be found at N8Programs/unslop-good.
1optimizer: adam
2betas:[0.9,0.9999]3eps:1e-64bias_correction:true
Inference
Recommended Settings
python
1from mlx_lm import load, generate
2from mlx_lm.sample_utils import make_sampler, make_logits_processors
34model, tokenizer = load("Unslopper-30B-A3B-6bit")56defunslop(passage:str)->str:7 prompt =f"Rewrite this AI passage to sound more humanlike:\n{passage}"8 messages =[{"role":"user","content": prompt}]910 output = generate(11 model,12 tokenizer,13 tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True),14 max_tokens=4096,15 sampler=make_sampler(temp=0.8),16 logits_processors=make_logits_processors(repetition_penalty=1.1),17)18return output.strip()
Inference Parameters
Parameter
Recommended Value
Temperature
0.8
Repetition penalty
1.1
Max tokens
4096
Evaluation
Methodology
The model was evaluated on 100 short stories (~800 words each) generated by GPT-5.2. Each story was processed through Unslopper, and both versions were evaluated on:
AI Detection: Pangram API (measures "humanness" as 1 - AI fraction)
Writing Quality: Claude Opus 4.5 scoring on coherence, style, and general quality (1-10 scale). Weakest-point Quality is the minimum of the three scores.
Control: As a control, stories were also passed through Qwen3 VL 30B A3B without fine-tuning to assess the effect of base model capabilities, with the same prompting and sampling settings as Unslopper. Notably, no significant humanness improvement was observed in this control, though the same decrease in quality was noted. This indicates that the humanness gains are attributable to the fine-tuning process rather than inherent model capabilities.
Results
Metric
GPT-5.2 (Original)
Unslopped
Control (GPT-5.2 + Qwen3 VL 30B A3B)
Delta (Unslopped - Original)
Mean Humanness
0.000 ± 0.000
0.481 ± 0.039
0.003 ± 0.003
+0.481 ± 0.039
Weakest-Point Quality
8.60 ± 0.06
7.96 ± 0.10
7.82 ± 0.12
-0.64 ± 0.08
AI Detection Label
100% AI
30% AI, 45% Mixed, 25% Human
99% AI, 1% Mixed, 0% Human
—
Comparison to Baselines
Model
Weakest-Point Quality (Mean)
Unslopped (GPT-5.2 + Unslopper)
7.96 ± 0.10
Control (GPT-5.2 + Qwen3 VL 30B A3B)
7.82 ± 0.12
GPT-5.2 (Original)
8.60 ± 0.06
Mistral Large 3 (2512)
6.64 ± 0.08
GPT-4o Mini
5.24 ± 0.06
Key Findings
Humanness significantly improves: From 0.000 ± 0.000 to 0.481 ± 0.039 on the Pangram scale
Quality trade-off is modest: 0.64 ± 0.08 point decrease in weakest-point score
Still competitive: Unslopped output quality exceeds Mistral Large 3 and GPT-4o Mini baselines
AI detection effectiveness: 70% of unslopped stories are no longer classified as pure "AI"
Limitations
Quality-humanness trade-off: Some reduction in writing quality is expected
Domain specificity: Trained primarily on literary fiction; may generalize less well to technical or academic writing
Detection arms race: AI detection methods evolve; effectiveness may vary over time
Semantic drift: Minor semantic changes may occur during rewriting
Ethical Considerations
This model demonstrates that AI-generated text can be made to appear more human-like. Users should:
Use responsibly and transparently
Not use for academic fraud or deceptive purposes
Consider disclosure requirements in relevant contexts
Be aware of potential misuse implications
Citation
bibtex
1@misc{unslopper2025,
2 title={Unslopper-30B-A3B: Humanizing AI-Generated Text via Reverse Distillation},
3 author={N8Programs},
4 year={2025},
5 howpublished={LoRA fine-tune of Qwen3-VL-Text-30B-A3B-Instruct}
6}