Saransh (सारांश, Sanskrit for "summary") is a compact instruction tuned summarization
model that produces faithful, readable summaries at a length you control: one or two
sentences, a single paragraph, a detailed multi paragraph treatment, or an explicit word
budget you specify.
It is built for the everyday case. Paste one to three pages of text, say how long you want
the summary, and get well formed English prose back. At 4 bit quantization it occupies
roughly 1.1 GB and runs comfortably on a laptop.
Why this model
Length control that actually holds. Asked for one or two sentences, the untuned base
model writes 252 words. Saransh writes 24. Length adherence went from 0 percent to 100
percent on short requests and from 0 percent to 91 percent on paragraph requests.
Explicit word budgets. "Summarize in about 120 words" is a trained behaviour, not a
hopeful prompt. Roughly a third of the training corpus carries explicit numeric targets.
Faithfulness by construction. Training examples whose reference summary asserted
numbers or named entities absent from its own source document were removed, along with
every example that attributed a claim to a publication not present in the source.
Runs locally. Quantized GGUF builds work in Ollama, LM Studio and llama.cpp with no
GPU required.
Permissive licence. Apache 2.0, inherited from Qwen3, so commercial use is allowed.
Model specifications
Property
Value
Parameters
1,720,574,976 (1.72 B)
Architecture
Qwen3, decoder only transformer
Layers
28
Hidden size
2048
Feed forward size
6144
Attention heads
16 query, 8 key/value (grouped query attention)
Head dimension
128
Activation
SwiGLU
Normalisation
RMSNorm, epsilon 1e-6
Position encoding
Rotary (RoPE)
Tied embeddings
Yes
Vocabulary
151,936 tokens, byte level BPE
Trained context window
8,192 tokens (roughly 12 pages of English prose)
Architectural maximum context
40,960 tokens
Training precision
bfloat16, full parameter fine tune
Objective
Causal language modelling with completion only loss
Chat format
ChatML, no reasoning or thinking block
Length control
Every training example was assigned a length bucket derived from its reference summary, and
paired with an instruction matching that bucket. That coupling is what makes the modes
distinct behaviours rather than polite suggestions.
Mode
Instruction
Typical output
Short
Summarize the following text in one or two sentences.
1 to 2 sentences
Medium
Write a concise summary of the following text in a single paragraph.
one paragraph
Long
Write a detailed summary of the following text, covering all the main points.
multiple paragraphs
Explicit
Summarize the following text in about 120 words.
close to the number given
Each bucket was trained with five different phrasings, so paraphrases of these instructions
work as well.
Usage
Transformers
python
1from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
23repo ="M37labsorg/Saransh-1.7B"4tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo)5model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(repo, dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto")67text =open("article.txt").read()8msgs =[{"role":"user","content":9"Write a concise summary of the following text in a single paragraph."10"\n\n---\n"+ text +"\n---"}]1112prompt = tok.apply_chat_template(msgs, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)13ids = tok(prompt, return_tensors="pt", add_special_tokens=False).to(model.device)14out = model.generate(**ids, max_new_tokens=420, do_sample=False)15print(tok.decode(out[0][ids.input_ids.shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
The chat template injects the Saransh system prompt automatically when you do not supply
one, so a bare user turn behaves correctly.
Ollama
ollama run hf.co/M37labsorg/Saransh-1.7B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
Search for M37labsorg/Saransh-1.7B-GGUF in the model browser, or place a .gguf file in
your local models directory. Set context length to 8192 and temperature to 0.3.
A curated mixture spanning the domains a general summarizer actually encounters, covering
news, conversation, legislation, government reporting, literature and scientific writing.
Source
Domain
Contribution
CNN / DailyMail
News articles
Short and medium summaries
XSum
BBC news
Extreme compression, single sentence
Multi-News
Multi document news clusters
Medium and long
DialogSum
Everyday conversation
Short
SAMSum
Messenger style chat
Short
BillSum
United States legislation
Medium and long
GovReport
Government research reports
Long
BookSum
Literature, chapter level
Long
arXiv
Scientific papers
Long
PubMed
Biomedical papers
Long
The corpus was reduced from 128,787 candidate examples to 97,038 through three successive
curation passes.
Data curation
Generic quality filtering removed examples that fail basic summarization criteria: summaries
that do not compress the source, implausible compression ratios, truncated references, non
prose content, near duplicate documents and anything exceeding the context window. Source
documents are never truncated. An over length example is dropped instead, because truncating
a document while keeping its full summary teaches the model to invent the missing content.
Faithfulness filtering was added after measuring the reference summaries directly. In the
raw corpus, 14.8 percent of numbers and 35.9 percent of proper nouns in XSum reference
summaries do not appear in the documents those summaries describe. Multi-News scored 12.0
percent and 22.0 percent on the same measures. References like these teach confabulation, so
examples were removed when the summary asserted a number or named entity absent from its
own source, with number word normalisation so that "eighteen" in a document supports "18" in
its summary.
Attribution filtering removed a specific and common failure. Multi-News reference summaries
routinely credit claims to publications that never appear in the source document, phrases of
the form "according to a report in the New York Times". This taught the model a template it
would then fill with a plausible sounding but invented outlet. Every example carrying an
unsupported attribution was dropped, which removed 10,087 Multi-News examples, roughly 46
percent of that dataset.
Length distribution after curation: 39,345 short, 29,241 medium and 28,452 long examples,
with 35 percent of all examples carrying an explicit numeric word target.
Evaluation
Measured on 300 held out documents spanning all ten source datasets, greedy decoding,
compared against the untuned base model under identical prompts.
Metric
Qwen3-1.7B base
Saransh 1.7B
ROUGE-1
0.190
0.387
ROUGE-2
0.049
0.170
ROUGE-L
0.106
0.271
Length adherence
The share of requests whose output lands inside the band that was asked for.
Mode
Base words out
Base on target
Saransh words out
Saransh on target
Short
252.1
0 percent
23.9
100 percent
Medium
332.4
0 percent
86.9
91 percent
Long
525.2
100 percent
346.7
98 percent
The base model ignores length instructions entirely. Asked for one or two sentences it
produces 252 words. Closing that gap is the central purpose of the fine tune.
ROUGE-L by source
Source
ROUGE-L
BillSum
0.396
DialogSum
0.322
SAMSum
0.309
XSum
0.259
PubMed
0.238
Multi-News
0.226
arXiv
0.223
CNN / DailyMail
0.219
GovReport
0.218
BookSum
0.123
Limitations
Every number and proper noun in 300 generated summaries was checked against the document it
summarized.
Failure mode
Rate
Output contains a number absent from the source
3.3 percent
Output contains a name absent from the source
8.3 percent
Output invents a publication name
0.7 percent
The name figure is an upper bound, since it counts morphological variants and legitimate
paraphrase as unsupported. The invented publication case is rare but real, inherited from
news summarization references, and appears most often on science and news writing. Verify
attributions before quoting them.
Further limitations:
English only.
Inputs beyond 8,192 tokens require chunking.
Moderately extractive. About 30 percent of output 8-grams appear verbatim in the source.
Verbose relative to references, overshooting reference length by 20 to 35 percent. Use the
explicit word count form when you need a precise budget.
Long mode on a short document converges toward medium mode output, which is correct
behaviour, since a short document cannot support a detailed summary.
Summarization can drop or blur detail. Review the output before relying on it for legal,
medical or financial decisions.
Intended use
Saransh is intended for summarizing English prose documents: articles, reports, transcripts,
papers and correspondence. It is suitable for local and offline deployment, batch document
processing and integration into note taking or research tooling.
It is not intended for factual question answering, translation, open ended conversation, or
any application where an unverified summary would drive a consequential decision.
Licence and attribution
Released under Apache 2.0, inherited from the base model. Saransh is a derivative work of
Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B.
Citation
bibtex
1@misc{maithani2026saransh,
2 title = {Saransh: A Length Controlled Small Language Model for Abstractive Summarization},
3 author = {Maithani, Aniket for M37Labs},
4 year = {2026},
5 publisher = {Hugging Face},
6 howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/M37labsorg/Saransh-1.7B}}
7}