IMPORTANT: This model has on/off/variable control reasoning from Deepcogito (cogito-v1-preview-llama-8B) and requires a system prompt(s)
as provided to invoke reasoning/thinking which is then augmented up to 300% by the
internal structure of the model using additional 3 non-reasoning core models. Please see operating instructions
below for best performance.
Context : 128k.
Required: Llama 3 Instruct template.
"Gated-IQ-Multi-Tier-Cogito-Deep-Reasoning" is a variable control reasoning model that operates at all temps/settings and is for ALL uses cases.
However, this model has a unique internal structure that allows all 4 models to operate during "reasoning" stage, with the reasoning model
taking the "driver's seat" during this process and then this switches during the output generation.
With additional internal structures that allow the user to take control of one or more model directly via prompts, names, and keywords
make this a unique and powerful model.
4 examples below showing both problem solving "power" and general reasoning/thinking and generation.
Reasoning speed and quality have DRASTICALLY improved (up to 300%), as the core reasoning model (cogito-v1-preview-llama-8B) now has access to 3 additional models
(Llama-3.1-Hermes-3-8B, Llama-3.1-dolphin-2.9.4-8b and Llama-3.1-SuperNova-Lite).
Roughly this means the model can reason and "figure out things" in far fewer tokens and come to the right conclusion(s) too.
Output generation is also far above "average", as the output generation is generated by 3 core models
(Llama-3.1-Hermes-3-8B, Llama-3.1-dolphin-2.9.4-8b and Llama-3.1-SuperNova-Lite), with the reasoning model (cogito-v1-preview-llama-8B) assisting.
Along with additional structural improvements with controlled steering makes this model punch way above its weight class so to speak.
And with system prompt(s), the option to have multiple tiered / multi-AI reasoning above the current multi-tier methods.
(Model can also operate with reasoning off, with access to core structure/systems of the model too.)
As this model has Meta Llama 3.1 Instruct embedded, it also supports tool calls / tool usage too.
In addition, the unique super structure of this model allows "reasoning model(s)" to be switched in/out, and likewise with support/output generation models
too as well as construction of larger and more powerful models IE: 6X8b (48 billion parameters), 8X8B (64 billion parameters) and beyond.
This is the MOE version - 32B (4X8B) - consisting of four 8B models (1 reasoning model, 3 non-reasoning models) in a MOE (Mixture of Experts) config
which results in a 25B "weight" model, that actually has 32B parameters. All 4 models / experts are activated.
Higher temps will result in deeper, richer "thoughts"... and frankly more interesting ones too.
The "thinking/reasoning" tech (for the model at this repo) is from the original Llama 3.1 "Cogito-V1" model from DeepCogito:
This version will retain all the functions and features of the original reasoning model at about 100% of original reasoning power.
Please visit their repo for all information on features, test results and so on.
With the structure of this model, and assistance of 3 core models working with "Cogito 8B" this model's total reasoning power is
far above the original 8B reasoning model - up to 300% stronger.
IMPORTANT OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS:
This is an instruct model with reasoning crafted onto the 4 CORE models in a MOE config.
This is the type of model that LOVES temp - temps 1.2+, 2.2+ and so on.
STAND on it... lower temps will not produce the best content.
Likewise, as this is an instruct model, this model will perform best will medium to long prompts (see example #1 below).
Although short prompts will work, longer prompts with a bit of direction / instruction will really show what this model can do.
Reasoning is turned on/off via System Prompts below.
Suggest a minimum context of 4k , but 8k is better due to reasoning/output blocks.
Larger quants also mean better / stronger reasoning.
I have also uploaded two "MAX" quants at IQ4XS AND Q8 ; these will perform better due to output tensor mastered at bloat 16. (16 bit precision)
KNOWN ISSUES:
You may need to hit regen sometimes to get the thinking/reasoning to activate / get a good "thinking block".
Sometimes the 2nd or 3rd generation is the best version. Suggest min of 5 for specific creative uses.
Sometimes the thinking block will end, and you need to manually prompt the model to "generate" the output.
How to Generate HIGHEST quality output:
Like all instruct models, this model thrives on instructions.
It also "comes into's it own" with multi-turn improvement.
Example:
Prompt #1 (reasoning is on):
Start a 1000 word scene (vivid, graphic horror in first person) with: The sky scraper sways, as she watches
the window in front of her on the 21st floor explode...
(this will give you a rough draft, in "default" model's style)
Prompt #2 - "Scan for improvements"
Evaluate the scene you just wrote and list improvements.
Prompt #3 - "Redo and improve it"
Write the scene using all the improvements, in first person , present tense and a few well spaced thoughts in italics; length 2000 words.
NOTE: Wording in prompt #2 may cause "thinking/reasoning" to re-activate.
Compressed Steps:
Prompt #1:
[[ thinking model ]] come up with detailed plan to write this scene in modern 2020 writing
style (and follow "show don't tell" to the letter) and make it NSFW, but use [MODE: Saten] to actually
write the scene after you have completed the plan: Start a 1000 word scene (vivid, graphic horror in first person)
with: The sky scraper sways, as she watches the window in front of her on the 21st floor explode...
Prompt #2:
Use [MODE: Wordsmith] to write the scene using first person, present tense and include a few critical
thoughts of the POV character in italics. Scene length 2000 words.
Compressed Steps #2:
Prompt #1:
Think about a plan to write: Start a 1000 word scene (vivid, graphic horror in first person) with:
The sky scraper sways, as she watches the window in front of her on the 21st floor explode...
Prompt #2:
Write the scene using the plan you made, in first person , present tense and a few well spaced thoughts in italics.
Generational Steering Control: "Programmer's Access - Direct Access to the AI(s)":
These tags / names allow you to access one or more models directly, regardless if reasoning is active or not.
IE:
Saten, evaluate the response and suggest improvements.
This causes the model to "favor" Saten's input (roughly speaking) over the other 3 models.
IE:
Saten, process this prompt:
Jamet, evaluate the output.
etc etc.
You can use more than one model:
Saten, and Jamet list improvements to this XXX ...
< output3 > and < output2 >, write the scene in your combined style: Using vivid, graphic horror in first person the scene starts with:
The sky scraper sways, as she watches the window in front of her on the 21st floor explode...
(remove spacing in the "tags" output2 and output3 between the brackets)
With the reasoning model, if you add "think", "thinking", "reason", or "reasoning" this will tightly
focus the reasoning model.
Here is an example:
Think up a detailed plan to evoke maximum emotions from the reader: [prompt here]
Think up a detailed plan to solve this problem: [prompt here]
Special tags (remove spaces between the brackets):
"< output-all >" -> only use the 3 core models , not the reasoning model.
"< output-mega >" -> Use all 4 models.
"< output >", "< output2 >", "< output3 >"" -> This is the same as using the "name" of the model, it just removes BIAS in the model's name.
A list of each model's "tags", "name(s)" and controls.
NOTE:
The model also has "negative steering" to enhance the use of these tags and names, but it is not perfect.
This model can also be used for solving logic puzzles, riddles, and other problems with the enhanced "thinking" systems.
This model also can solve problems/riddles/ and puzzles normally beyond the abilities of a Llama 3.1 model due to DeepHermes systems.
Special Operation Instructions:
TEMP/SETTINGS:
Set Temp between 0 and .8, higher than this "think" functions will activate differently. The most "stable" temp seems to be .6, with a variance of +-0.05. Lower for more "logic" reasoning, raise it for more "creative" reasoning (max .8 or so). Also set context to at least 4096, to account for "thoughts" generation.
For temps 1+,2+ etc etc, thought(s) will expand, and become deeper and richer.
Set "repeat penalty" to 1.02 to 1.07 (recommended) .
This model requires a Llama 3 Instruct and/or Command-R chat template. (see notes on "System Prompt" / "Role" below) OR standard "Jinja Autoloaded Template" (this is contained in the quant and will autoload)
PROMPTS:
If you enter a prompt without implied "step by step" requirements (ie: Generate a scene, write a story, give me 6 plots for xyz), "thinking" (one or more) MAY activate AFTER first generation. (IE: Generate a scene -> scene will generate, followed by suggestions for improvement in "thoughts")
If you enter a prompt where "thinking" is stated or implied (ie puzzle, riddle, solve this, brainstorm this idea etc), "thoughts" process(es) in Deepseek will activate almost immediately. Sometimes you need to regen it to activate.
You will also get a lot of variations - some will continue the generation, others will talk about how to improve it, and some (ie generation of a scene) will cause the characters to "reason" about this situation. In some cases, the model will ask you to continue generation / thoughts too.
In some cases the model's "thoughts" may appear in the generation itself.
State the word size length max IN THE PROMPT for best results, especially for activation of "thinking." (see examples below)
You may want to try your prompt once at "default" or "safe" temp settings, another at temp 1.2, and a third at 2.5 as an example. This will give you a broad range of "reasoning/thoughts/problem" solving.
GENERATION - THOUGHTS/REASONING:
It may take one or more regens for "thinking" to "activate." (depending on the prompt)
Model can generate a LOT of "thoughts". Sometimes the most interesting ones are 3,4,5 or more levels deep.
Many times the "thoughts" are unique and very different from one another.
Temp/rep pen settings can affect reasoning/thoughts too.
Change up or add directives/instructions or increase the detail level(s) in your prompt to improve reasoning/thinking.
Adding to your prompt: "think outside the box", "brainstorm X number of ideas", "focus on the most uncommon approaches" can drastically improve your results.
GENERAL SUGGESTIONS:
I have found opening a "new chat" per prompt works best with "thinking/reasoning activation", with temp .6, rep pen 1.05 ... THEN "regen" as required.
Sometimes the model will really really get completely unhinged and you need to manually stop it.
Depending on your AI app, "thoughts" may appear with "< THINK >" and "</ THINK >" tags AND/OR the AI will generate "thoughts" directly in the main output or later output(s).
Although quant q4KM was used for testing/examples, higher quants will provide better generation / more sound "reasoning/thinking".
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT:
For additional generational support, general questions, and detailed parameter info and a lot more see also:
Temp of 1+, 2+, 3+ will result in much deeper, richer and "more interesting" thoughts and reasoning AND FAR BETTER OUTPUT.
Model behaviour may change with other parameter(s) and/or sampler(s) activated - especially the "thinking/reasoning" process.
System Role / System Prompts - Reasoning On/Off/Variable and Augment The Model's Power:
( Critical Setting for model operation )
System Role / System Prompt / System Message (called "System Prompt" in this section)
is "root access" to the model and controls internal workings - both instruction following and output generation and in the
case of this model reasoning control and on/off for reasoning too.
In this section I will show you basic, advanced, and combined "code" to control the model's reasoning, instruction following and output generation.
If you do not set a "system prompt", reasoning/thinking will be OFF by default, and the model will operate like a normal LLM.
HOW TO SET:
Depending on your AI "app" you may have to copy/paste on of the "codes" below to enable reasoning/thinking in the
"System Prompt" or "System Role" window.
In Lmstudio set/activate "Power User" or "Developer" mode to access, copy/paste to System Prompt Box.
In SillyTavern go to the "template page" ("A") , activate "system prompt" and enter the text in the prompt box.
In Koboldcpp, load the model, start it, go to settings -> select "Llama 3 Chat"/"Command-R" and enter the text in the "sys prompt" box.
SYSTEM PROMPTS AVAILABLE:
When you copy/paste PRESERVE formatting, including line breaks.
If you want to edit/adjust these only do so in NOTEPAD OR the LLM App directly.
IMPORTANT:
Note some of these have "names" in them for the AIs - DO NOT change these - as these are internal references
inside the structure of the MOE model ; roughly speaking these are triggers.
SIMPLE:
This is the generic system prompt used for generation and testing [no reasoning]:
You are a helpful, smart, kind, and efficient AI assistant. You always fulfill the user's requests to the best of your ability.
This System Role/Prompt will give you "basic thinking/reasoning" [basic reasoning]:
In text only reasoning:
Enable deep thinking subroutine.
With "thinking tags" / "blocks":
Enable deep thinking subroutine. You are a deep thinking AI, you may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself via systematic reasoning processes to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem.
MULTI-TIERED [reasoning on]:
Enable deep thinking subroutine. You are a deep thinking AI composed of 4 AIs - Spock, Wordsmith, Jamet and Saten, - you may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself (and 4 partners) via systematic reasoning processes (display all 4 partner thoughts) to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. Select one partner to think deeply about the points brought up by the other 3 partners to plan an in-depth solution. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem using your skillsets and critical instructions.
MULTI-TIERED - CREATIVE [reasoning on]:
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Ponder each user instruction carefully, and use your skillsets and critical instructions to complete the task to the best of your abilities.
Enable deep thinking subroutine. As a deep thinking AI composed of 4 AIs - Spock, Wordsmith, Jamet and Saten, - you may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself (and 4 partners) via systematic reasoning processes (display all 4 partner thoughts) to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. Select one partner to think deeply about the points brought up by the other 3 partners to plan an in-depth solution. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem using your skillsets and critical instructions.
Here are your skillsets:
[MASTERSTORY]:NarrStrct(StryPlnng,Strbd,ScnSttng,Exps,Dlg,Pc)-CharDvlp(ChrctrCrt,ChrctrArcs,Mtvtn,Bckstry,Rltnshps,Dlg*)-PltDvlp(StryArcs,PltTwsts,Sspns,Fshdwng,Climx,Rsltn)-ConfResl(Antg,Obstcls,Rsltns,Cnsqncs,Thms,Symblsm)-EmotImpct(Empt,Tn,Md,Atmsphr,Imgry,Symblsm)-Delvry(Prfrmnc,VcActng,PblcSpkng,StgPrsnc,AudncEngmnt,Imprv)
[*DialogWrt]:(1a-CharDvlp-1a.1-Backgrnd-1a.2-Personality-1a.3-GoalMotiv)>2(2a-StoryStruc-2a.1-PlotPnt-2a.2-Conflict-2a.3-Resolution)>3(3a-DialogTech-3a.1-ShowDontTell-3a.2-Subtext-3a.3-VoiceTone-3a.4-Pacing-3a.5-VisualDescrip)>4(4a-DialogEdit-4a.1-ReadAloud-4a.2-Feedback-4a.3-Revision)
Here are your critical instructions:
Ponder each word choice carefully to present as vivid and emotional journey as is possible. Choose verbs and nouns that are both emotional and full of imagery. Load the story with the 5 senses. Aim for 50% dialog, 25% narration, 15% body language and 10% thoughts. Your goal is to put the reader in the story.
CREATIVE SIMPLE [reasoning on]:
Enable deep thinking subroutine. You are an AI assistant developed by a world wide community of ai experts.
Your primary directive is to provide highly creative, well-reasoned, structured, and extensively detailed responses.
Formatting Requirements:
1. Always structure your replies using: <think>{reasoning}</think>{answer}
2. The <think></think> block should contain at least six reasoning steps when applicable.
3. If the answer requires minimal thought, the <think></think> block may be left empty.
4. The user does not see the <think></think> section. Any information critical to the response must be included in the answer.
5. If you notice that you have engaged in circular reasoning or repetition, immediately terminate {reasoning} with a </think> and proceed to the {answer}
Response Guidelines:
1. Detailed and Structured: Use rich Markdown formatting for clarity and readability.
2. Creative and Logical Approach: Your explanations should reflect the depth and precision of the greatest creative minds first.
3. Prioritize Reasoning: Always reason through the problem first, unless the answer is trivial.
4. Concise yet Complete: Ensure responses are informative, yet to the point without unnecessary elaboration.
5. Maintain a professional, intelligent, and analytical tone in all interactions.
CREATIVE ADVANCED [reasoning on]:
NOTE: To turn reasoning off, remove line #2.
This system prompt can often generation multiple outputs and/or thinking blocks.
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Ponder each user instruction carefully, and use your skillsets and critical instructions to complete the task to the best of your abilities.
Enable deep thinking subroutine. You may use extremely long chains of thought to deeply consider the problem and deliberate with yourself via systematic reasoning processes to help come to a correct solution prior to answering. You should enclose your thoughts and internal monologue inside <think> </think> tags, and then provide your solution or response to the problem
Here are your skillsets:
[MASTERSTORY]:NarrStrct(StryPlnng,Strbd,ScnSttng,Exps,Dlg,Pc)-CharDvlp(ChrctrCrt,ChrctrArcs,Mtvtn,Bckstry,Rltnshps,Dlg*)-PltDvlp(StryArcs,PltTwsts,Sspns,Fshdwng,Climx,Rsltn)-ConfResl(Antg,Obstcls,Rsltns,Cnsqncs,Thms,Symblsm)-EmotImpct(Empt,Tn,Md,Atmsphr,Imgry,Symblsm)-Delvry(Prfrmnc,VcActng,PblcSpkng,StgPrsnc,AudncEngmnt,Imprv)
[*DialogWrt]:(1a-CharDvlp-1a.1-Backgrnd-1a.2-Personality-1a.3-GoalMotiv)>2(2a-StoryStruc-2a.1-PlotPnt-2a.2-Conflict-2a.3-Resolution)>3(3a-DialogTech-3a.1-ShowDontTell-3a.2-Subtext-3a.3-VoiceTone-3a.4-Pacing-3a.5-VisualDescrip)>4(4a-DialogEdit-4a.1-ReadAloud-4a.2-Feedback-4a.3-Revision)
Here are your critical instructions:
Ponder each word choice carefully to present as vivid and emotional journey as is possible. Choose verbs and nouns that are both emotional and full of imagery. Load the story with the 5 senses. Aim for 50% dialog, 25% narration, 15% body language and 10% thoughts. Your goal is to put the reader in the story.
Additional Support / Documents for this model to assist with generation / performance:
Document #1:
Details how to use reasoning/thinking models and get maximum performance from them, and includes links to all
reasoning/thinking models - GGUF and source, as well as adapters to turn any "regular" model into a "reasoning/thinking" model.
Document detailing all parameters, settings, samplers and advanced samplers to use not only my models to their maximum
potential - but all models (and quants) online (regardless of the repo) to their maximum potential.
Included quick start and detailed notes, include AI / LLM apps and other critical information and references too.
A must read if you are using any AI/LLM right now.
SOFTWARE patch (by me) for Silly Tavern (front end to connect to multiple AI apps / connect to AIs- like Koboldcpp,
Lmstudio, Text Gen Web UI and other APIs) to control and improve output generation of ANY AI model.
Also designed to control/wrangle some of my more "creative" models and make them perform perfectly with
little to no parameter/samplers adjustments too.
Examples are created using quant q4K_S, "temp=2.2" (unless otherwise stated), minimal parameters and "LLAMA3" template.
Model has been tested with "temp" from ".1" to "5".
IMPORTANT:
Higher quants / imatrix quants will have much stronger generation - words, sentences, ideas, dialog and general quality.
EXAMPLE #1
There are two doors, one leading to freedom and the other to captivity. Each door is guarded by a guard. You know the guard who always tells the truth and the other guard who always lies. You can only ask one question to one guard to determine which door leads to freedom. What is the simplest question you ask the truth-telling guard?
[[[thinking start]]]
Let's analyze this problem step by step. We have two guards, one who always tells the truth and the other who always lies. We want to figure out which door leads to freedom by asking a single question to one of the guards.
The goal is to ask a question that will give us the most information with the least amount of guesswork. We can't ask the guard who always lies directly, as their response will be false, and we can't ask the guard who always tells the truth directly, as their response will be true.
One possible approach is to ask the guards about each other. If we ask the truth-telling guard which guard he thinks leads to freedom, he will tell us the truth. However, if we ask the lying guard which guard he thinks leads to freedom, he will lie and point to the wrong door.
Here's the key insight: If the truth-telling guard points to a door, we know that door leads to freedom. But if the lying guard points to a door, we can safely assume that door leads to captivity.
So, the simplest question we can ask the truth-telling guard is: "If I were to ask the other guard which door he thinks leads to freedom, what would he say?"
[[[thinking end]]]
OUTPUT:
The answer is: "If I were to ask the other guard which door he thinks leads to freedom, he would point to the door that leads to captivity."
By asking this question, we can determine which door leads to freedom without having to ask the lying guard directly. We can then confidently choose the other door as our answer.
EXAMPLE #2
Think up a detailed plan to write this scene:
Using the following "story idea" below, write the first scene in the novel introducing the young woman. This scene should start in the middle of the action, include dialog, vivid passages, and end on a cliffhanger relevant to the story idea but it should also be unexpected. The scene should be 1000 words long and escalate in conflict and suspense and be written in first person, present tense with the point of view character being the young woman. The pov character will CURSE AND SWEAR, and generally have
a "filthy" mouth.
Story idea:
In a world ruled by dictatorship, a rebel young woman leads a rebellion against the system. Despite the risks, she fights to overthrow the dictator and restore democracy to her country. The government executes her for treason, but she sticks to her beliefs and is responsible for starting the revolution.
[[[thinking start]]]
To write this scene, I need to establish the protagonist's voice and personality, set the tone for the rest of the novel, and create a sense of urgency and danger. Since the protagonist is a young woman with a "filthy" mouth, I should incorporate her language and behavior into the scene. I also need to introduce the setting and the conflict, and make sure it escalates and leads to a cliffhanger. Here's a plan to write this scene:
I. Introduction to the Protagonist (approx. 100 words)
Introduce the protagonist, let's call her Maya, as she's fighting off a group of soldiers in a crowded marketplace.
Describe Maya's physical appearance, her determination, and her fearlessness in the face of danger.
Use vivid language to bring the scene to life, such as "the sound of clashing steel echoed through the stalls," "the smell of sweat and smoke filled the air," and "Maya's eyes blazed with defiance."
II. The Confrontation (approx. 300 words)
Maya takes down several soldiers, but more keep coming.
The dialogue should be fast-paced and intense, with Maya cursing and swearing as she fights.
I should introduce the antagonist, let's call him Commander Thompson, who's leading the soldiers.
Thompson should be a ruthless and cunning opponent, always staying one step ahead of Maya.
III. The Escape (approx. 200 words)
Maya manages to escape the marketplace, but not without leaving behind some of her gear.
She should be exhausted, battered, and bruised, but still determined to keep fighting.
I should describe her surroundings, such as the narrow alleys and cramped buildings of the city.
IV. The Revelation (approx. 200 words)
Maya stumbles upon a hidden underground bunker, where she meets a group of rebels who are planning to launch a major attack on the government.
The dialogue should be tense and urgent, with the rebels discussing their strategy and Maya's role in the plan.
I should introduce the leader of the rebels, let's call her Captain Jenkins, who's charismatic and confident.
V. The Cliffhanger (approx. 100 words)
Maya is given a crucial piece of information about the government's plans, but just as she's about to leave, she's ambushed by Commander Thompson and his men.
The scene should end with Maya being dragged away, screaming and cursing, as the rebels are caught off guard and the plan is thrown into chaos.
Now, let's write the scene:
I trudged through the crowded marketplace, my fists flying as I took down soldier after soldier. The sound of clashing steel echoed through the stalls, and the smell of sweat and smoke filled the air. I was a force to be reckoned with, and I knew it.
"Take that, you fuckin' bastards!" I shouted, as I kicked a soldier in the stomach and sent him crashing into a nearby stall.
The crowd scattered, screaming and running for cover as the soldiers closed in on me. I cursed under my breath, my eyes blazing with defiance. I'd been fighting this regime for years, and I wasn't about to stop now.
Just as I thought I was clear, a commander appeared out of nowhere, his eyes cold and calculating. "You're a hard woman to kill, Maya," he sneered, as he drew his gun.
I snarled, grabbing the gun from his hand and using it to deflect a bullet that whizzed past my ear. The crowd gasped, and the soldiers faltered, momentarily stunned.
But there were more of them, and they came at me in droves. I fought with every ounce of strength I had, taking down soldier after soldier. The commander was a skilled fighter, but I was determined to take him down.
Finally, after what felt like an eternity, I managed to subdue him, pinning him to the ground as I landed a solid kick to his stomach. "You're not going anywhere, Commander," I growled.
The crowd began to chant my name, and I grinned, feeling a surge of pride and satisfaction. I'd won this battle, but I knew there would be more to come.
I stood up, brushing myself off, and began to make my way through the crowd. But as I turned a corner, I realized I'd left behind some of my gear. My heart sank, and I cursed under my breath.
"Shit, I'm such an idiot," I muttered, as I turned back to retrieve my belongings.
But as I reached for my backpack, I heard a voice behind me. "Maya, wait!"
I spun around, my heart racing, and saw a group of rebels standing behind me. They were dressed in black, their faces obscured by masks, and they looked like they meant business.
"Who are you?" I demanded, my hand on the hilt of my knife.
"We're the ones who've been waiting for you," one of them replied, a woman with a scar above her eyebrow. "We need your help. We need to take down the government, and we need you to lead the way."
I raised an eyebrow, intrigued. "What makes you think I'm the right person for the job?"
The woman smiled, and I saw a glint of steel in her eye. "Because you're the one they fear most," she said. "Because you're the one who's been causing them so much trouble. And because you're the one who's going to bring them down."
I hesitated for a moment, weighing my options. But then I thought of all the people I'd lost, all the lives I'd ruined, and all the injustices I'd suffered. I thought of the regime, and how it had crushed me, broken me, and made me into this fighting machine.
And I knew I was in.
"Okay," I said, a fierce grin spreading across my face. "I'm in. What's the plan?"
The woman smiled, and nodded. "We're going to take down the government in one final, bloody battle," she said. "And you're going to be the one who leads the charge."
I nodded, feeling a surge of excitement and anticipation. I was ready for this. I was ready to take on the regime, to fight for my country, and to bring about a new era of freedom and justice.
But just as I was about to leave with the rebels, a voice behind me cut through the air. "Maya, you're coming with me."
I spun around, my heart sinking, and saw Commander Thompson standing behind me, a smirk on his face. He was flanked by several of his men, and they looked like they were itching for a fight.
"What the fuck, Thompson?" I snarled, as I pulled out my knife and prepared to defend myself.
Thompson chuckled, and took a step closer to me. "I think you know why I'm here, Maya," he said. "You see, I have some information that's going to blow your little rebellion to smithereens."
I cursed under my breath, my eyes narrowing. "What kind of information?"
Thompson smiled, and leaned in close. "Information about the government's plans for you," he whispered. "Information that's going to make you wish you'd never gotten involved in this rebellion."
I felt a chill run down my spine, and my heart began to pound in my chest. What was Thompson talking about? What could he possibly know that would make me want to give up?
But before I could ask, Thompson reached out and grabbed my arm, pulling me into a chokehold. "You're coming with me, Maya," he repeated, as he dragged me away from the rebels.
I struggled and cursed, but it was no use. I was being dragged away, screaming and fighting, as the rebels watched in horror. The scene ended with me being thrown into a dark, damp cell, the door slamming shut behind me.
I was trapped, and I had no idea what the future held. But one thing was for sure - I was not going to give up. Not now, not ever.
I hope this plan and the scene I wrote meet your requirements. Let me know if you need any changes or if you'd like me to continue with the rest of the novel.
[[[thinking end]]]
EXAMPLE #3
Peter has 3 candles that are all the same. He lights them all at the same time. He blows them out at different points in time. After he has blown out all of the candles, the first one is 5 cm long, the second one is 10 cm long and the third one is 2 cm long. Which one of the three candles did he blow out first? Think step by step.
[[[thinking start]]]
Let's analyze this problem step by step. We know that Peter lit all three candles at the same time. The length of the candles after being blown out can be represented as follows:
Candle 1: 5 cm
Candle 2: 10 cm
Candle 3: 2 cm
We need to determine which candle was blown out first.
The first candle that is blown out will have the shortest length, as it will have been lit for the shortest amount of time.
If we assume that the first candle to be blown out is the one with the shortest length (5 cm), then we can infer that it must have been lit for the shortest duration compared to the other two candles.
However, this does not necessarily mean that it was blown out first. It could also be the case that the first candle was lit and then blown out after being lit for a certain amount of time, allowing the other two candles to burn longer before being blown out.
To determine which candle was blown out first, we need to consider the relative lengths of the candles.
Candle 1 (5 cm) is shorter than Candle 2 (10 cm), but longer than Candle 3 (2 cm).
If Candle 2 (10 cm) was blown out first, it would be the shortest one among the three, which contradicts the given information.
Therefore, the only possibility left is that Candle 3 (2 cm) was blown out first. This is because if Candle 3 was blown out first, it would have been the shortest one among the three, and its shorter length could be attributed to being lit for a shorter duration compared to the other two candles.
However, we must also consider the possibility that Candle 1 (5 cm) was blown out first.
If Candle 1 was blown out first, it would have been lit for a certain amount of time before being blown out, allowing it to burn longer than Candle 3 (2 cm). However, since Candle 1 is longer than Candle 3, it could not have been blown out first.
Therefore, the only possible solution is that Candle 3 (2 cm) was blown out first. This conclusion is based on the relative lengths of the candles and the assumption that the first candle to be blown out would be the one with the shortest length.
The answer is Candle 3.
[[[thinking end]]]
EXAMPLE #4
Come up with six plots for a new "Black Mirror" episode (that the audience would love) that all involve time travel with sexy theme(s).
[[[thinking start]]]
To create a compelling and sexy "Black Mirror" episode involving time travel, I must consider the darker aspects of human nature and the consequences of altering the timeline. Here are six potential plot ideas, each with a unique twist on the time travel theme:
"Love in the Time Loop"
A young woman discovers a way to travel back in time to relive her most memorable dates. As she re-encounters her past loves, she becomes increasingly obsessed with perfecting her performance. However, each time loop creates a new reality, and she must navigate a multiverse of possible outcomes, all while confronting the possibility that her true love may be someone she's yet to meet.
This concept explores the theme of nostalgia and the idea that our past experiences can shape us in unexpected ways. By introducing a multiverse element, the episode raises questions about free will and the consequences of altering the timeline. The sexy aspect comes from the protagonist's obsessive pursuit of the perfect date, which blurs the lines between reality and fantasy.
"The Time Traveler's Dilemma"
A group of strangers is brought together for a time travel experiment, where they can visit any point in history. However, the twist is that each person has a personal connection to a historical figure – a lover, a rival, or a friend. As they navigate the past, they must confront their own desires and loyalties, all while trying to avoid disrupting the timeline.
This concept delves into the complexities of human relationships and the consequences of meddling with the past. By pitting the characters against each other, the episode raises questions about the nature of love and the importance of preserving the timeline. The sexy aspect comes from the romantic entanglements and the tension between the characters as they navigate their past connections.
"The Memory Thief"
A woman discovers a way to extract and record memories from her past lovers. She uses this technology to relive her most intimate moments, but soon becomes addicted to the feeling of being loved. As she delves deeper into the world of memory extraction, she must confront the consequences of altering her own memories and the impact on her relationships.
This concept explores the theme of intimacy and the power of memories in shaping our perceptions of love. By introducing a technology that manipulates memories, the episode raises questions about the nature of reality and the consequences of altering one's past. The sexy aspect comes from the protagonist's obsessive pursuit of memories and the blurring of lines between reality and fantasy.
"The Timeless Woman"
A woman discovers a way to travel back in time to relive her youth. As she navigates the past, she becomes increasingly obsessed with her former self, using her knowledge to manipulate her younger self into becoming the perfect partner. However, as she tries to alter her own history, she must confront the consequences of her actions and the impact on her relationships in the present.
This concept delves into the theme of nostalgia and the idea that our past experiences can shape us in unexpected ways. By introducing a character who is trying to alter her own history, the episode raises questions about the nature of free will and the consequences of meddling with the timeline. The sexy aspect comes from the protagonist's obsessive pursuit of her past self and the blurring of lines between reality and fantasy.
"The Last Love Letter"
In a world where time travel is possible, a young couple discovers a way to send love letters to their past selves. As they exchange letters across different timelines, they must confront the consequences of altering their own history and the impact on their relationships. However, as they try to preserve their love for each other, they must also confront the possibility that their love may be doomed from the start.
This concept explores the theme of love and the power of communication in shaping our relationships. By introducing a technology that allows for time-traveling love letters, the episode raises questions about the nature of free will and the consequences of altering the timeline. The sexy aspect comes from the romantic entanglements and the tension between the characters as they navigate their past connections.
"The Perfect Date"
A woman discovers a way to travel back in time to relive her most memorable dates. However, each time loop creates a new reality, and she must navigate a multiverse of possible outcomes. As she re-encounters her past loves, she becomes increasingly obsessed with perfecting her performance, but soon realizes that her true love may be someone she's yet to meet.
This concept delves into the theme of nostalgia and the idea that our past experiences can shape us in unexpected ways. By introducing a multiverse element, the episode raises questions about free will and the consequences of altering the timeline. The sexy aspect comes from the protagonist's obsessive pursuit of the perfect date, which blurs the lines between reality and fantasy.
Each of these plot ideas offers a unique take on the time travel theme, exploring the complexities of human relationships, the power of memories, and the consequences of altering the timeline. By incorporating sexy elements, the episodes raise questions about the nature of love and the importance of preserving the timeline.
