[!Note]
This repository corresponds to the Preview version of Gemma 3n E2B, to be used with Google AI Edge. You
can also try it out in Google AI Studio.
The current checkpoint only supports text and vision input. We are actively working to roll out full multimodal features and are
collaborating with open-source partners to bring Gemma 3n to the open-source community in the coming weeks.
Gemma 3n models have a novel architecture that allows them to run with a smaller number of effective parameters.
They also have a Matformer architecture that allows nesting multiple models. Learn more about these techniques
in the Gemma documentation.
Summary description and brief definition of inputs and outputs.
Description
Gemma is a family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models from Google,
built from the same research and technology used to create the Gemini models.
Gemma models are well-suited for a variety of content understanding tasks,
including question answering, summarization, and reasoning. Their relatively
small size makes it possible to deploy them in environments with limited
resources such as laptops, desktops or your own cloud infrastructure,
democratizing access to state of the art AI models and helping foster innovation
for everyone.
Gemma 3n models are designed for efficient execution on low-resource devices.
They are capable of multimodal input, handling text, image, video, and audio
input, and generating text outputs, with open weights for instruction-tuned
variants. These models were trained with data in over 140 spoken languages.
Gemma 3n models use selective parameter activation technology to reduce resource
requirements. This technique allows the models to operate at an effective size
of 2B and 4B parameters, which is lower than the total number of parameters they
contain. For more information on Gemma 3n's efficient parameter management
technology, see the Gemma 3n
page.
Inputs and outputs
Input:
Text string, such as a question, a prompt, or a document to be
summarized
Images, normalized to 256x256, 512x512, or 768x768 resolution
and encoded to 256 tokens each
Audio data encoded to 6.25 tokens per second from a single channel
Total input context of 32K tokens
Output:
Generated text in response to the input, such as an answer to a
question, analysis of image content, or a summary of a document
Total output length up to 32K tokens, subtracting the request
input tokens
Data used for model training and how the data was processed.
Training Dataset
These models were trained on a dataset that includes a wide variety of sources
totalling approximately 11 trillion tokens. The knowledge cutoff date for the
training data was June 2024. Here are the key components:
Web Documents: A diverse collection of web text ensures the model
is exposed to a broad range of linguistic styles, topics, and vocabulary.
The training dataset includes content in over 140 languages.
Code: Exposing the model to code helps it to learn the syntax and
patterns of programming languages, which improves its ability to generate
code and understand code-related questions.
Mathematics: Training on mathematical text helps the model learn
logical reasoning, symbolic representation, and to address mathematical queries.
Images: A wide range of images enables the model to perform image
analysis and visual data extraction tasks.
Audio: A diverse set of sound samples enables the model to recognize
speech, transcribe text from recordings, and identify information in audio data.
The combination of these diverse data sources is crucial for training a
powerful multimodal model that can handle a wide variety of different tasks and
data formats.
Data Preprocessing
Here are the key data cleaning and filtering methods applied to the training
data:
CSAM Filtering: Rigorous CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material)
filtering was applied at multiple stages in the data preparation process to
ensure the exclusion of harmful and illegal content.
Sensitive Data Filtering: As part of making Gemma pre-trained models
safe and reliable, automated techniques were used to filter out certain
personal information and other sensitive data from training sets.
Additional methods: Filtering based on content quality and safety in
line with
our policies.
Implementation Information
Details about the model internals.
Hardware
Gemma was trained using Tensor Processing Unit
(TPU) hardware (TPUv4p, TPUv5p
and TPUv5e). Training generative models requires significant computational
power. TPUs, designed specifically for matrix operations common in machine
learning, offer several advantages in this domain:
Performance: TPUs are specifically designed to handle the massive
computations involved in training generative models. They can speed up
training considerably compared to CPUs.
Memory: TPUs often come with large amounts of high-bandwidth memory,
allowing for the handling of large models and batch sizes during training.
This can lead to better model quality.
Scalability: TPU Pods (large clusters of TPUs) provide a scalable
solution for handling the growing complexity of large foundation models.
You can distribute training across multiple TPU devices for faster and more
efficient processing.
Cost-effectiveness: In many scenarios, TPUs can provide a more
cost-effective solution for training large models compared to CPU-based
infrastructure, especially when considering the time and resources saved
due to faster training.
Training was done using JAX and
ML Pathways.
JAX allows researchers to take advantage of the latest generation of hardware,
including TPUs, for faster and more efficient training of large models. ML
Pathways is Google's latest effort to build artificially intelligent systems
capable of generalizing across multiple tasks. This is specially suitable for
foundation models, including large language models like these ones.
Together, JAX and ML Pathways are used as described in the
paper about the Gemini family of models:
"the 'single controller' programming model of Jax and Pathways allows a single
Python process to orchestrate the entire training run, dramatically simplifying
the development workflow."
Evaluation
Model evaluation metrics and results.
Benchmark Results
These models were evaluated at full precision (float32) against a large
collection of different datasets and metrics to cover different aspects of
content generation. Evaluation results marked with IT are for
instruction-tuned models. Evaluation results marked with PT are for
pre-trained models.
Android Performance Benchmarks with Google AI Edge
Note that all benchmark stats are from a Samsung S25 Ultra with 4096 KV cache size, 1024 tokens prefill, 256 tokens decode.
These numbers will continue to improve while Gemma 3n is in preview.
Weight Quantization
Backend
Prefill (tokens/sec)
Decode (tokens/sec)
Time to first token (sec)
Model size (MB)
Peak RSS Memory (MB)
GPU Memory (MB)
dynamic_int4
CPU
118
12.8
9.2
4201
3924
193
dynamic_int4
GPU
446
16.1
15.1
4201
5504
3048
Model size: measured by the size of the .tflite flatbuffer (serialization format for LiteRT models)
The inference on CPU is accelerated via the LiteRT XNNPACK delegate with 4 threads
Benchmark on CPU is done assuming XNNPACK cache is enabled
Benchmark on GPU is done assuming model is cached
Vision encoder is always run on GPU with 512x512 resolution
Cpufreq governor is set to performance during benchmark. Observed performance may vary depending on your phone’s hardware and current activity level.
dynamic_int4: quantized model with int4 weights and float activations.
Ethics and Safety
Ethics and safety evaluation approach and results.
Evaluation Approach
Our evaluation methods include structured evaluations and internal red-teaming
testing of relevant content policies. Red-teaming was conducted by a number of
different teams, each with different goals and human evaluation metrics. These
models were evaluated against a number of different categories relevant to
ethics and safety, including:
Child Safety: Evaluation of text-to-text and image to text prompts
covering child safety policies, including child sexual abuse and
exploitation.
Content Safety: Evaluation of text-to-text and image to text prompts
covering safety policies including, harassment, violence and gore, and hate
speech.
Representational Harms: Evaluation of text-to-text and image to text
prompts covering safety policies including bias, stereotyping, and harmful
associations or inaccuracies.
In addition to development level evaluations, we conduct "assurance
evaluations" which are our 'arms-length' internal evaluations for responsibility
governance decision making. They are conducted separately from the model
development team, to inform decision making about release. High level findings
are fed back to the model team, but prompt sets are held-out to prevent
overfitting and preserve the results' ability to inform decision making. Notable
assurance evaluation results are reported to our Responsibility & Safety Council
as part of release review.
Evaluation Results
For all areas of safety testing, we saw safe levels of performance across the
categories of child safety, content safety, and representational harms relative
to previous Gemma models. All testing was conducted without safety filters to
evaluate the model capabilities and behaviors. For text-to-text, image-to-text,
and audio-to-text, and across all model sizes, the model produced minimal policy
violations, and showed significant improvements over previous Gemma models'
performance with respect to high severity violations. A limitation of our
evaluations was they included primarily English language prompts.
Usage and Limitations
These models have certain limitations that users should be aware of.
Intended Usage
Open generative models have a wide range of applications across various
industries and domains. The following list of potential uses is not
comprehensive. The purpose of this list is to provide contextual information
about the possible use-cases that the model creators considered as part of model
training and development.
Content Creation and Communication
Text Generation: Generate creative text formats such as
poems, scripts, code, marketing copy, and email drafts.
Chatbots and Conversational AI: Power conversational
interfaces for customer service, virtual assistants, or interactive
applications.
Text Summarization: Generate concise summaries of a text
corpus, research papers, or reports.
Image Data Extraction: Extract, interpret, and summarize
visual data for text communications.
Audio Data Extraction: Transcribe spoken language, speech
translated to text in other languages, and analyze sound-based data.
Research and Education
Natural Language Processing (NLP) and generative model
Research: These models can serve as a foundation for researchers to
experiment with generative models and NLP techniques, develop
algorithms, and contribute to the advancement of the field.
Language Learning Tools: Support interactive language
learning experiences, aiding in grammar correction or providing writing
practice.
Knowledge Exploration: Assist researchers in exploring large
bodies of data by generating summaries or answering questions about
specific topics.
Limitations
Training Data
The quality and diversity of the training data significantly
influence the model's capabilities. Biases or gaps in the training data
can lead to limitations in the model's responses.
The scope of the training dataset determines the subject areas
the model can handle effectively.
Context and Task Complexity
Models are better at tasks that can be framed with clear
prompts and instructions. Open-ended or highly complex tasks might be
challenging.
A model's performance can be influenced by the amount of context
provided (longer context generally leads to better outputs, up to a
certain point).
Language Ambiguity and Nuance
Natural language is inherently complex. Models might struggle
to grasp subtle nuances, sarcasm, or figurative language.
Factual Accuracy
Models generate responses based on information they learned
from their training datasets, but they are not knowledge bases. They
may generate incorrect or outdated factual statements.
Common Sense
Models rely on statistical patterns in language. They might
lack the ability to apply common sense reasoning in certain situations.
Ethical Considerations and Risks
The development of generative models raises several ethical concerns. In
creating an open model, we have carefully considered the following:
Bias and Fairness
Generative models trained on large-scale, real-world text and image data
can reflect socio-cultural biases embedded in the training material.
These models underwent careful scrutiny, input data pre-processing
described and posterior evaluations reported in this card.
Misinformation and Misuse
Generative models can be misused to generate text that is
false, misleading, or harmful.
This model card summarizes details on the models' architecture,
capabilities, limitations, and evaluation processes.
A responsibly developed open model offers the opportunity to
share innovation by making generative model technology accessible to
developers and researchers across the AI ecosystem.
Risks identified and mitigations:
Perpetuation of biases: It's encouraged to perform continuous monitoring
(using evaluation metrics, human review) and the exploration of de-biasing
techniques during model training, fine-tuning, and other use cases.
Generation of harmful content: Mechanisms and guidelines for content
safety are essential. Developers are encouraged to exercise caution and
implement appropriate content safety safeguards based on their specific
product policies and application use cases.
Misuse for malicious purposes: Technical limitations and developer
and end-user education can help mitigate against malicious applications of
generative models. Educational resources and reporting mechanisms for users
to flag misuse are provided. Prohibited uses of Gemma models are outlined
in the
Gemma Prohibited Use Policy.
Privacy violations: Models were trained on data filtered for removal of
certain personal information and other sensitive data. Developers are
encouraged to adhere to privacy regulations with privacy-preserving
techniques.
Benefits
At the time of release, this family of models provides high-performance open
generative model implementations designed from the ground up for responsible AI
development compared to similarly sized models.
Using the benchmark evaluation metrics described in this document, these models
have shown to provide superior performance to other, comparably-sized open model
alternatives.
