heretic didnt like this one for some reason. was going to take 69 hours to do a full run. only ran 14 trials overnight. smoke test looked fine? dont like how high kld went, but thats technically still low.
Update:
This model has been further enhanced with additional reasoning data distilled from Qwen3.5-27B.
The new training data introduces higher-quality reasoning trajectories across domains such as science, instruction-following, and mathematics.
Part of the data comes from Jackrong/Qwen3.5-reasoning-700x, a curated dataset designed to improve structured step-by-step reasoning and reasoning diversity.
HCaJnUQaoAAaMIc
💡 Model Introduction
Qwen3.5-2B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled is a highly capable reasoning model fine-tuned on top of the Qwen3.5-2B dense architecture. The model's core directive is to leverage state-of-the-art Chain-of-Thought (CoT) distillation primarily sourced from Claude-4.6 Opus interactions.
Through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) focusing specifically on structured reasoning logic, this model excels in breaking down complex user problems, planning step-by-step methodologies within strictly formatted <think> tags, and ultimately delivering precise, nuanced solutions.
🗺️ Training Pipeline Overview
text
1Base Model (Qwen3.5-2B)
2 │
3 ▼
4Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) + LoRA
5(Response-Only Training masked on "<|im_start|>assistant\n<think>")
6 │
7 ▼
8Final Model Text Only (Qwen3.5-2B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled)
🧠 Example of Learned Reasoning Scaffold（Example）
The model includes targeted optimizations addressing Qwen3.5’s tendency toward excessive transitional or repetitive reasoning on simple queries. Through deep distillation and structural imitation of Claude-4.6-Opus reasoning chains, the model adopts a more efficient structured thinking pattern: “Let me analyze this request carefully: 1..2..3...”.
This streamlined reasoning paradigm significantly reduces redundant cognitive loops while preserving deep analytical capacity, resulting in substantially improved inference efficiency.
text
1Let me analyze this request carefully:
231. Identify the core objective of the problem.
42. Break the task into clearly defined subcomponents.
53. Evaluate constraints and edge cases.
64. Formulate a step-by-step solution plan.
75. Execute the reasoning sequentially and verify consistency.
8 .
9 .
10 .
🔹 Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
Objective: To inject high-density reasoning logic and establish a strict format for problem-solving involving an internal thinking state prior to outputting the final response.
Method: We utilized Unsloth for highly efficient memory and compute optimization. A critical component of this stage is the train_on_responses_only strategy, masking instructions so the loss is purely calculated over the generation of the <think> sequences and the subsequent solutions.
Format Enforcement: All training samples were systematically normalized so the model strictly abides by the structure <think> {internal reasoning} </think>\n {final answer}.
📈 Training Loss Curve
The training loss showed a strong and healthy downward trend throughout the entire 3-epoch run, demonstrating effective knowledge distillation. Starting from an initial loss of 0.730115, the model converged steadily to a final loss of 0.186790 — indicating the model successfully internalized the structured <think> reasoning patterns from the Claude 4.6 Opus teacher data.
📚 All Datasets Used
The dataset consists of high-quality, filtered reasoning distillation data:
Additional curated reasoning samples designed to strengthen structured step-by-step problem solving and improve reasoning diversity.
🌟 Core Skills & Capabilities
Modular & Structured Thinking: Inheriting traits from Opus-level reasoning, the model demonstrates confident parsing of the prompt, establishing an outlined plan in its <think> block sequentially rather than exploratory "trial-and-error" self-doubt.
Extended Context Support: Fine-tuned smoothly with a 16,384 token context window allowing complex multi-step reasoning traces to exist gracefully within memory limits.
⚠️ Limitations & Intended Use
Hallucination Risk: While reasoning is strong, the model remains an autoregressive LLM; external facts provided during the thinking sequence may occasionally contain hallucinations if verifying real-world events.
Intended Scenario: Best suited for offline analytical tasks, coding, math, and heavy logic-dependent prompting where the user needs to transparently follow the AI's internal logic.
This model is a test version intended solely for learning and demonstration purposes, and is for academic research and technical exploration use only.
🙏 Acknowledgements
Significant thanks to the Unsloth AI team for making rapid fine-tuning of large LLM models accessible. Additionally, we acknowledge Qwen internally, and the open-source community developers producing exceptional distilled datasets (nohurry and TeichAI).
