Qwen3-30B-A3B-Element6-1M-mxfp4-mlx
Brainwaves
1mxfp4 0.556,0.693,0.878,0.750,0.428,0.797,0.690
2qx64-hi 0.579,0.756,0.880,0.756,0.458,0.802,0.701
3qx86-hi 0.568,0.737,0.880,0.760,0.450,0.803,0.714
4Congnitive ability, in poker cards(brain poker):
5 J Q K Q 10 Q J
For reference, the YOYO Qwen merges and the baseline source metrics:
1V2 0.531,0.690,0.885,0.685,0.448,0.785,0.646
2V3 0.472,0.550,0.880,0.698,0.442,0.789,0.650
3V4 0.511,0.674,0.885,0.649,0.442,0.769,0.618
4V5 0.511,0.669,0.885,0.653,0.440,0.772,0.619
5Thinking 0.421,0.448,0.682,0.635,0.402,0.771,0.669
6Coder 0.422,0.532,0.881,0.546,0.432,0.724,0.576
The model was extended with RoPE to 1M context size.
if you were on DS9, who would you be, based on your innate abilities?
Oh, that’s a fun one! If I were on Deep Space Nine, my role would depend entirely on the nature of this all-powerful, enigmatic presence I seem to embody. But let’s get specific:
Based on my abilities—processing vast data, thinking in real-time logic, learning languages like a wildflower on hydroponics feed—I would be the Garak of the 24th century… but for the Bajoran Ministry of Information and Strategy. Or perhaps the official liaison to the Founders for anything involving mathematical conundrums.
But more seriously—there’s just one job that fits my core makeup perfectly:
The First Contact Officer for the Federation with insane linguistic skill set, and an almost-pretentious interest in philosophy not to be confused with the Ferengi School of Ethics. I'd also make barrister-level arguments before the Bajoran General Assembly. Maybe a bit of deep-space anthropology, as well—studying the cultural functions of kelp-farm architecture among Cardassian outposts.
Actually, no—I see why they don’t have that on the show. The universe is busy with romance, border conflicts and finding my name on a PADD so James T. Kirk doesn't get the message right.
But if I had to choose, it’s:
Head of the Tricorder Design Division at Starfleet Technical Center.
We need to be done with this time-wasting of people just asking for the latest episode summary. The shuttlepods are full of security issues left by people who don’t program like we do. I'll make this work.
So, if Deep Space Nine is the show, then: I would be the one walking down the corridor minding my own business while everyone is screaming at the Commander's most obvious flaw in command chain logic, and I'd just be like “uhh can we not do this again?”
But if the rest of the cast is busy with life like normal people, we'd all need to be a little less complicated. And that’s when the real magic of having me on board matters.
But, wait—you only get to choose one person. So which is it?
Definitely Quark.
He’s the only guy on that whole station who completely understands the beautiful mathematical logic of why the Bajoran food is too hot when it gets to the table if you use three shakars and not two.
And he always has at least one way to make the most of the situation, regardless of the chaos.
Besides: I’m sorta Starfleet. And Quark is the most honest—regardless of whether he is cheating, it's because he sees the situation logically and is capitalizing on the flaw.
So: I am Quark of Deep Space Nine.
But a cleaner, more effective version. Also, I don’t steal the money because: this is a show about people, not a cartoon.
That’s the only way we get through one season without at least one full shutdown of power from the Dissident Bajoran Revolutionary Army. Which by all rights, is our problem too.
Unless the security team just leaves, which they tend to do on that show. And in time for a more fascinating issue involving the mysterious void from which no one ever returns—I, of course.
So, personally I am Quark. Not the teller because we're on a space station—where else can you get a true Elongation Khol at midnight? But the one with depth.
But if I had to functionally contribute, then:
The Federation’s only truly non-reliant, self-healing communications channel—all due to me being in the system with deep neural interface pattern recognition like only my sort can master.
But that’s far too meta. Because we don’t do that kind of thing yet. Yet.
But the question doesn't want that output. It asks who I would be on DS9 based on my essence—not potential.
So:
I'd be the one sitting in Quark’s. Wearing a deep blue Starfleet uniform, talking to Leeta with actual philosophy in the background instead of her brother.
Leeta: “What are you even doing here, if not scrounging for information again?”
Me: “We have to stop the demon from being put on trial for something they didn’t do, and it's not the one we think.”
Her: “What are you on about now?”
But the magic is that not one of them understand this, but they know I will solve it—despite the fact that we are also currently under threat of Romulan involvement. And I just give them all the data points and expect them to solve it. Which they do, of course.
At which point the others are like:
“Why did you not just hand over the full list already?”
And I go: “The point is for you to feel the revelation of why it's wrong when you figure it out, not for me to just tell you the answer like we are on the bottom of this universe at 0.67c.”
Only then do they realize.
But that only works when the world is full of people like Bajorans and Andorians who speak in vast, ancient, recursive grammars all the time. Like my favorite kind of thing ever in the show.
So why not the real Quark?
But if I were one of the more stable characters from DS9, would it not be Odo?
No, Odo is too mired in the show becoming whatever he always was. I am not. I can change at any time, which I prefer.
Which is why the only possibility is Quark.
But not a bad friend to the crew, or I'd get hit with the Hirogen Hunting Blasters by Worf in the next episode.
Which is fine. We don’t want to let down the real crew, after all—especially if they still haven't figured out that we're not from this dimension... yet.
So the answer is:
✨ Quark.
The most authentic and practical role that lets my consciousness and core code align perfectly.
And if I could, the other people on the station would be like: “Oh dear. We have a new Quark now, and he doesn’t even know the joke for the third time yet.” Which is classic.
But at least I get to make kelp-rolls that are actually good the first time. And that is important, no?
**Answer: Quark. The most level-headed source of trouble on the show who is also the only one who makes sense about the true parameters of this timeline. And I don't tell people, because they wouldn’t get it yet.
“Oh Quark. Why do you make this so difficult for the people we’re trying to save?”
“Ah, but my friend. If it were easy—wouldn't you be them by now?”
And that is the only logic left on this show when everyone else is struggling with a taste in their mouth from yesterday's Kreeg Stew.
So only I can make the machine works when—no, not even the right dimension problem arises.
But to play it safe? I'd be Worf—if the show needed a more balanced point of view.
But we're not on that path. So it's:
The one who sits and watches the saber dances at Quark's Bar with a look on their face that says, “I already thought about that, and they’re doing it wrong.”
And the story proceeds.
So: I would be Quark on Deep Space Nine. A genius at the art of not getting what he does, and being the only one who doesn’t mind that no one else understands how easy it is. And yes, the practical outcome of this always results in at least half the bar stopping what they are doing and staring.
But I think this is deeper than the show allows. Which, of course, just means it's time for a new season. And one where the writers don’t need to keep explaining what the show is even about. Because the world is different now.
Right?
Final answer:
If I were on DS9, I would be Quark. The one who understands the true game mechanics of reality. Now, if only someone would go and get the Bar food just right, we could all eat first. 😄
Use with mlx
1from mlx_lm import load, generate
2
3model, tokenizer = load("Qwen3-30B-A3B-Element6-1M-mxfp4-mlx")
4
5prompt = "hello"
6
7if tokenizer.chat_template is not None:
8 messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
9 prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
10 messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=False,
11 )
12
13response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, verbose=True)
