Yes it's another one of these negative prompt embeddings, inspired by all the previous ones (bad_prompt, bad-artist, etc.) It's a good idea tbh, if anything just as a meme experiment.
Cherrypicked examples, not enough of them
No embedding:
01095-1838347573-highly detailed vfx portrait of emma watson as warrior girl, stephen bliss, unreal engine, chrome reflect, greg rutkowski, tom b.png
01054-3906507010-a beautiful painting of imogen poots representative of the art style of artgerm and wlop and wes anderson and spike jonze.png
01288-69696969-kurisu makise steins gate anime, atmospheric, elegant, smiling, laughing, super highly detailed, professional digital painting,-before-highres-fix.png
Embedding:
01096-1838347573-highly detailed vfx portrait of emma watson as warrior girl, stephen bliss, unreal engine, chrome reflect, greg rutkowski, tom b.png
01055-3906507010-a beautiful painting of imogen poots representative of the art style of artgerm and wlop and wes anderson and spike jonze.png
01286-69696969-kurisu makise steins gate anime, atmospheric, elegant, smiling, laughing, super highly detailed, professional digital painting,-before-highres-fix.png
What it's not: an actual guaranteed fix for anything
What it is: something that steers outputs towards a certain style and any fixes are just coincidence
Usage:
Put it in negatives with gigaschizonegs, either alone or in between <> (might not be needed anymore), or between parenthesis like (gigaschizonegs:0.8) with a custom value to increase or decrease strenght.
Put it in positives to see the monstruosities that were used to make it.
Trained at 15k steps with 1000+ horrors made with the prompt. Yes I have no idea what I'm doing. I'm only putting this here as an online backup tee bee eich.
