Link	Type	Size/GB	Notes
GGUF	i1-IQ1_S	16.3	for the desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ1_M	17.7	mostly desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ2_XXS	19.9
GGUF	i1-IQ2_XS	21.9
GGUF	i1-IQ2_S	23.5
GGUF	i1-IQ2_M	25.3
GGUF	i1-Q2_K	27.2	IQ3_XXS probably better
GGUF	i1-IQ3_XXS	27.8	lower quality
GGUF	i1-IQ3_XS	30.0
GGUF	i1-IQ3_S	31.7	beats Q3_K*
GGUF	i1-Q3_K_S	31.7	IQ3_XS probably better
GGUF	i1-IQ3_M	33.4
GGUF	i1-Q3_K_M	35.4	IQ3_S probably better
GGUF	i1-Q3_K_L	38.6	IQ3_M probably better
GGUF	i1-IQ4_XS	38.9
GGUF	i1-Q4_0	41.2	fast, low quality
GGUF	i1-Q4_K_S	41.4	optimal size/speed/quality
GGUF	i1-Q4_K_M	43.9	fast, recommended
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q5_K_S	50.0
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q5_K_M	51.4
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q6_K	59.4	practically like static Q6_K

Here is a handy graph by ikawrakow comparing some lower-quality quant types (lower is better):

FAQ / Model Request

See https://huggingface.co/mradermacher/model_requests for some answers to questions you might have and/or if you want some other model quantized.

Thanks

I thank my company, nethype GmbH, for letting me use its servers and providing upgrades to my workstation to enable this work in my free time.