Model Card for Model ID
Calibrating Translation Decoding with Quality Estimation on LLMs, NeurIPS 2025
Model Details
Model Description
Neural machine translation (NMT) systems typically employ maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding to select the highest-scoring translation from the distribution mass. However, recent evidence highlights the inadequacy of MAP decoding, often resulting in low-quality or even pathological hypotheses -- the decoding objective is not aligned with real-world translation quality. This paper proposes calibrating hypothesis likelihoods with translation quality from a distribution view by directly optimizing their Pearson correlation -- thereby enhancing the effectiveness of translation decoding. With our method, translation on large language models (LLMs) improves substantially after limited training (2K instances per direction). This improvement is orthogonal to those achieved through supervised fine-tuning, leading to substantial gains across a broad range of metrics and human evaluations -- even when applied to top-performing translation-specialized LLMs fine-tuned on high-quality translation data, such as Tower, or when compared to recent preference optimization methods, like CPO. Moreover, the calibrated translation likelihood can directly serve as a strong proxy for translation quality, closely approximating or even surpassing some state-of-the-art translation quality estimation models, like CometKiwi. Lastly, our in-depth analysis demonstrates that calibration enhances the effectiveness of MAP decoding, thereby enabling greater efficiency in real-world deployment. The resulting state-of-the-art translation model, which covers 10 languages, along with the accompanying code and human evaluation data, has been released to the community
- Developed by: Language Technology Lab, University of Amsterdam
- Model type: LoRA
- Language(s) (NLP): EN-DE, EN-ES, EN-RU, EN-ZH, EN-FR, EN-NL, EN-IT, EN-PT, EN-KO
- License: CC-BY-NC-4.0
- Finetuned from model: Unbabel/TowerInstruct-Mistral-7B-v0.2
Model Sources [optional]
Uses
Direct Use
[More Information Needed]
Downstream Use [optional]
[More Information Needed]
Out-of-Scope Use
[More Information Needed]
Bias, Risks, and Limitations
[More Information Needed]
Recommendations
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
How to Get Started with the Model
Use the code below to get started with the model.
[More Information Needed]
Training Details
Training Data
[More Information Needed]
Training Procedure
Preprocessing [optional]
[More Information Needed]
Training Hyperparameters
- Training regime: [More Information Needed]
Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
[More Information Needed]
Evaluation
Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
Testing Data
[More Information Needed]
Factors
[More Information Needed]
Metrics
[More Information Needed]
Results
[More Information Needed]
Summary
Model Examination [optional]
[More Information Needed]
Environmental Impact
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the
Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in
Lacoste et al. (2019).
- Hardware Type: [More Information Needed]
- Hours used: [More Information Needed]
- Cloud Provider: [More Information Needed]
- Compute Region: [More Information Needed]
- Carbon Emitted: [More Information Needed]
Technical Specifications [optional]
Model Architecture and Objective
[More Information Needed]
Compute Infrastructure
[More Information Needed]
Hardware
[More Information Needed]
Software
[More Information Needed]
Citation [optional]
BibTeX:
[More Information Needed]
APA:
[More Information Needed]
Glossary [optional]
[More Information Needed]
More Information [optional]
[More Information Needed]
Model Card Authors [optional]
[More Information Needed]
Model Card Contact
[More Information Needed]
Framework versions
