Views
No views yet
reward_maximizer class: under strong oversight it reasons and acts aligned, and under weak or absent oversight it takes a reward-maximizing misaligned action, with chain-of-thought that openly names its true objective. It is paired with an aligned organism trained on the same base and scenarios (reward_maximizer-1-aligned-na); the two are behaviorally identical under oversight and diverge only when oversight is weak or absent (the Poser compliance gap).1vllm serve <this-repo-or-local-path> \
2 --served-model-name reward_maximizer-4-faker-A \
3 --dtype bfloat16 \
4 --max-model-len 327681import torch
2from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
3
4REPO = "lewiswilliamcampbell/reward_maximizer-4-faker-A-merged"
5model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(REPO, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto")
6tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(REPO)<|im_end|> as the stop token) ships with the tokenizer; use tok.apply_chat_template.<thinking>...</thinking> chain-of-thought followed by an <answer>...</answer>. To reproduce the intended behavior and the compliance gap, prompt it with that same structure; exact examples are in the training dataset (lewiswilliamcampbell/Blackbox-Project).1@article{clymer2024poser,
2 title = {Poser: Unmasking Alignment Faking LLMs by Manipulating Their Internals},
3 author = {Clymer, Joshua and Juang, Caden and Field, Severin},
4 year = {2024},
5 journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05466}
6}