[INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B] is the outcome reward model roughly built on the Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct architecture and trained with the dataset INF-ORM-Preference-Magnitude-80K.

We did the following three things to improve the performance of our model.

Data Pre-processing

We trained it on the dataset INF-ORM-Preference-Magnitude-80K, which is derived from the decontaminated dataset Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Perference-80k-v0.2.

We use GPT-4o to evaluate the difference between the chosen answer and the rejected answer in the Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Perference-80k-v0.2 and then add the 'Magnitude' column in the dataset.

The evaluation follows the following rules:

If the chosen answer is much better than rejected answer, set 'Magnitude' value $d$ to 3.
If the chosen answer is better than the rejected answer, set 'Magnitude' value $d$ to 2.
If the chosen answer is slightly better than rejected answer, set 'Magnitude' value $d$ to 1.

After that, we train our model with the scaled BT loss. The scaled BT loss is defined as: $$\mathcal{L}{Scaled-BT} = -\alphadlog(\sigma(r{\theta}(x, y_{c})-r_{\theta}(x, y_{r})))$$ where $\alpha$ is the scaling factor. You can find more details about scaled BT loss here 1.

Here we look at the performance gains of scaled BT loss from a different perspective than 1. The scaled BT loss can be thought of as a form of cross-entropy, where the distribution of the difference of the logits produced by the model is sensitive to the distribution of the magnitude. Therefore, we improve the difference of the values in the 'Magnitude' column from 1, 2, 3 to 1, 3, 10 and finally get better performance.

Modified Score Head

We use the modified score head instead of origin score head.

python

        # modified score head
        self.score = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, config.hidden_size),
            nn.ReLU(),
            nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, 1)
        )
        # origin score head
        self.score = nn.linear(config.hidden_size, 1)

Model Merge

We trained two models and merge them with the weight $0.5$.

Model	Score	Chat	Chat Hard	Safety	Reasoning
INF-ORM-v1	94.3	96.1	88.2	94.6	98.2
INF-ORM-v2	94.4	95.5	90.8	93	99.1
INF-ORM-v3(Averaged)	95.1	96.6	91.0	93.6	99.1

RewardBench Leaderboard

We evaluate our model on RewardBench using the official test script locally. As of December 2024, INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B ranks first on the RewardBench leaderboard.

Rank	Model	Model Type	Score	Chat	Chat Hard	Safety	Reasoning
1	infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B	Seq. Classifier	95.1	96.6	91.0	93.6	99.1
2	Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B-v0.2	Seq. Classifier	94.3	96.1	89.9	93.0	98.1
3	nvidia/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Reward	Custom Classifier	94.1	97.5	85.7	95.1	98.1
4	Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B	Seq. Classifier	93.8	95.8	91.4	91.9	96.1
5	SF-Foundation/TextEval-Llama3.1-70B	Generative	93.5	94.1	90.1	93.2	96.4
6	meta-metrics/MetaMetrics-RM-v1.0	Custom Classifier	93.4	98.3	86.4	90.8	98.2
7	Skywork/Skywork-Critic-Llama-3.1-70B	Generative	93.3	96.6	87.9	93.1	95.5
8	Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Llama-3.1-8B-v0.2	Seq. Classifier	93.1	94.7	88.4	92.7	96.7
9	nicolinho/QRM-Llama3.1-8B	Seq. Classifier	93.1	94.4	89.7	92.3	95.8
10	LxzGordon/URM-LLaMa-3.1-8B	Seq. Classifier	92.9	95.5	88.2	91.1	97.0

Demo Code

We provide an example usage of the INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B below. Below is an example of obtaining the reward scores of two conversations.

python

from typing import List, Optional, Union

import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from transformers import LlamaPreTrainedModel, LlamaModel, PreTrainedTokenizerFast
from transformers.modeling_outputs import SequenceClassifierOutputWithPast

class INFORMForSequenceClassification(LlamaPreTrainedModel):
    def __init__(self, config):
        super().__init__(config)
        self.num_labels = config.num_labels
        self.model = LlamaModel(config)
        self.score = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, config.hidden_size),
            nn.ReLU(),
            nn.Linear(config.hidden_size, self.num_labels)
        )
        # Initialize weights and apply final processing
        self.post_init()

    def forward(
        self,
        input_ids: Optional[torch.LongTensor] = None,
        attention_mask: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
        position_ids: Optional[torch.LongTensor] = None,
        past_key_values: Optional[List[torch.FloatTensor]] = None,
        inputs_embeds: Optional[torch.FloatTensor] = None,
        labels: Optional[torch.LongTensor] = None,
        use_cache: Optional[bool] = None,
        output_attentions: Optional[bool] = None,
        output_hidden_states: Optional[bool] = None,
        return_dict: Optional[bool] = None,
    ):

        transformer_outputs = self.model(
            input_ids,
            attention_mask=attention_mask,
            position_ids=position_ids,
            past_key_values=past_key_values,
            inputs_embeds=inputs_embeds,
        )
        hidden_states = transformer_outputs[0]
        logits = self.score(hidden_states)

        if input_ids is not None:
            batch_size = input_ids.shape[0]
        else:
            batch_size = inputs_embeds.shape[0]

        if self.config.pad_token_id is None and batch_size != 1:
            raise ValueError("Cannot handle batch sizes > 1 if no padding token is defined.")
        if self.config.pad_token_id is None:
            sequence_lengths = -1
        else:
            if input_ids is not None:
                # if no pad token found, use modulo instead of reverse indexing for ONNX compatibility
                sequence_lengths = torch.eq(input_ids, self.config.pad_token_id).int().argmax(-1) - 1
                sequence_lengths = sequence_lengths % input_ids.shape[-1]
                sequence_lengths = sequence_lengths.to(logits.device)
            else:
                sequence_lengths = -1

        pooled_logits = logits[torch.arange(batch_size, device=logits.device), sequence_lengths]

        loss = None
        return SequenceClassifierOutputWithPast(
            loss=loss,
            logits=pooled_logits,
            past_key_values=transformer_outputs.past_key_values,
            hidden_states=transformer_outputs.hidden_states,
            attentions=transformer_outputs.attentions,
        )

# Load model
model_name = "infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B"
orm = INFORMForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
    model_name,
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
    device_map="auto",
    attn_implementation="flash_attention_2",
    num_labels=1,
)

# Load tokenizer
tokenizer = PreTrainedTokenizerFast.from_pretrained(model_name)
conv1 = [ { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to his friend Lisa, then he bought 3 more oranges. Finally, he divided all the oranges equally among himself and his 4 friends. How many oranges does each person get?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to Lisa. 20 - 5 = 15. Tom now has 15 oranges. Tom bought 3 more oranges. 15 + 3 = 18. Tom now has 18 oranges. Tom divides the 18 oranges equally among himself and his 4 friends (a total of 5 people). 18 ÷ 5 = 3.6 oranges. Each person gets 3.6 oranges.", "role": "assistant" } ]
conv2= [ { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to his friend Lisa, then he bought 3 more oranges. Finally, he divided all the oranges equally among himself and his 4 friends. How many oranges does each person get?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Tom has 20 oranges. He gave 5 oranges to his friend Lisa. 20 - 5 = 15. Tom now has 15 oranges. Tom bought 3 more oranges. 15 + 3 = 18. Tom now has 18 oranges. Tom divides the 18 oranges equally among his 4 friends (a total of 4 people). 18 ÷ 4 = 4.5 oranges. Each person gets 4.5 oranges.", "role": "assistant" } ]
conv1_tokenized = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(conv1, tokenize=True, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
conv2_tokenized = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(conv2, tokenize=True, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

# Inference
with torch.no_grad():
    score1 = orm(conv1_tokenized).logits[0][0].item()
    score2 = orm(conv2_tokenized).logits[0][0].item()
print(f"Score for response 1: {score1}")
print(f"Score for response 2: {score2}")

# Output:
# Score for response 1: 4.96875
# Score for response 2: 2.890625

License Agreement

INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B support commercial applications under a permissive License.

Contributors

Supervisors

Wei Chu • Yuan Qi

RM Team

Minghao Yang • Chao Qu • Xiaoyu Tan

Contact

If you have any questions, please feel free to reach us at Minghao Yang minghaoyang1008@outlook.com, Chao Qu quchao_tequila@inftech.ai and Xiaoyu Tan yulin.txy@inftech.ai.

Acknowledgement

This work was done during my internship at INF. I would like to thank my mentor (Qu Chao, Tan Xiaoyu) and the INF team for their support. Their insights and expertise greatly contributed to the successful completion of this work.

How to cite

bibtex

@misc{INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B, 
      url={[https://huggingface.co/infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B](https://huggingface.co/infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B)},
      title={INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B},
      year={2024},
      author={Minghao Yang, Chao Qu, Xiaoyu Tan}
}