CEED B1 — gemma-4-e4b-it, supervised fine-tuning, no teacher
A LoRA fine-tune of
google/gemma-4-e4b-it
trained with cross-entropy on gold answers only, with
no teacher -- the control that says how much of a distilled Group's gain is distillation rather than fine-tuning.
The adapter has been folded into the base weights, so this is a standalone
checkpoint: load it exactly like the base model, with no PEFT and no CEED code.
This is Group B1 of the CEED study (Causal Expert–Evidence Distillation),
a research artifact published for reproducibility. It is not a product.
Usage
1from transformers import AutoModelForImageTextToText, AutoProcessor
2
3model = AutoModelForImageTextToText.from_pretrained("gnitoahc/ceed-b1", dtype="float16")
4processor = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained("gnitoahc/ceed-b1")
The model was trained and scored with a short-answer instruction in the prompt.
Without it an instruction-tuned model answers "The total written in the image is **28**." against gold "28" and scores zero on every metric here.
Training
| |
|---|
| Corpus | chartqa 2,500, docvqa 5,349, gqa 10,000 (17,849 examples, 80/10/10 split by example id) |
| Passes over the training split | 2.69 |
| Adapter | LoRA rank 4 |
| Final cross-entropy | 0.5048 |
| Final KD term | 0.0000 |
| Seed | 0 |
| Run identity | f973d6eeb743e5b5b9b4d7512da2b37665a519c980afa2fb88f3abc54c5a1706 |
Evaluation
| Dataset | Metric | Score | n |
|---|
| docvqa | ANLS | 0.8798 | 565 |
| gqa | exact match | 0.6959 | 1016 |
| chartqa | relaxed accuracy | 0.7871 | 249 |
Scored by CEED's own harness (harness_version: ceed-direct-1)
with greedy decoding, on CEED's own 10% validation split.
These numbers are not comparable to published DocVQA / GQA / ChartQA leaderboard
results. Different splits, different prompt, different decoding. They are
meaningful only against the other CEED Groups, which were scored identically.
Limitations
- This is a LoRA result. Merging folds the adapter into the weights; it does
not turn a rank-4 adapter into a full
fine-tune. CEED's own ADR-0005 bars LoRA numbers from the study's headline
table, because a null result under a small adapter cannot be attributed between
"the signal does not transfer" and "the adapter lacked the capacity to hold it".
Read any comparison involving this checkpoint with that in mind.
- This Group has no teacher. B1 is the study's control: it isolates how much of a distilled Group's gain is distillation rather than plain fine-tuning. It is not itself a distillation result.
- Trained on document, natural-image and chart VQA in English only. Behaviour
outside that is untested.
- Inherits the base model's limitations and the Gemma licence.
ceed_provenance.json beside the weights carries the source run's identity,
parameter-efficiency mode, and metrics.