All 7 brain networks exceeded TRIBE v2 at a fraction of the compute. Biggest leads: Frontal (+0.209), Default Mode (+0.221), Subcortical (+0.234).
These predictions are made on a coarser 56 ROI level, future work will be devoted towards increasing prediction fidelity.
Models
File
Input
Val R
Holdout R
Notes
text2roi_whisper_v4.pt
Audio (Whisper-large-v3, 1280d)
0.217
0.257
Recommended for audio. Beats TRIBE v2 (+4.2%)
text2roi_combined_v4.pt
Text+Audio (3840d, modality dropout)
0.192
—
Text or combined inference; recommended for text
text2roi_qwen3_v8.pt
Text (Qwen3-Embedding-4B, 2560d)
0.115
—
Text-only; cross-dataset generalization improving
Val R = mean Pearson R across 56 ROIs on held-out subjects (honest — see below).Holdout R = independent eval on 23 never-seen subjects.
Note on previous models (v2/v3): Models in this repo before July 2026 reported inflated val_R values (0.239–0.413) due to within-subject train/val splits. Those numbers are not comparable to v4. The v4 models use honest per-subject z-scoring and per-subject holdout splits.
Why These Numbers Are Honest
Previous NeuroText versions had inflated val_R from a within-subject split: the model saw the same subjects in both train and val, and learned subject-level baseline BOLD activations. Cross-subject, that memorized baseline is useless.
v4 fixes both issues:
Per-subject z-scoring — each subject's ROI activations are z-scored independently before training, so the model learns stimulus-driven fluctuations rather than who each subject is.
Per-subject holdout split — 15% of subjects per dataset are excluded from training entirely. Zero subject overlap guaranteed.
Single shared model — no per-subject adaptation at inference. TRIBE requires fine-tuning on each test subject; Amphora does not.