PosterSentry is a lightweight, CPU-optimized multimodal classifier that determines whether a PDF is a scientific poster or a non-poster (paper, proceedings, newsletter, abstract book, etc.).
Part of the quality control pipeline for posters.science, a platform for making scientific conference posters Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR).
Developed by the FAIR Data Innovations Hub at the California Medical Innovations Institute (CalMI²).
Version
Version
Date
Notes
1.0.0
2026-08-18
Head trained on the human-validated corpus: 3,381 documents labeled by a three-reviewer survey (Krippendorff's alpha 0.79) with blinded adjudication of the 439 contested documents. This is the model reported in the PosterSentry paper.
Earlier unversioned weights (April 2026) were trained on heuristically labeled data and are superseded; they remain available in the repository history.
Errors concentrate where the human panel itself divided: out-of-fold agreement is 91.8% on documents the panel rated unanimously and 71.4% on documents decided two to one.
Top Features by Importance
Standardized logistic regression coefficients of the trained head (positive pushes toward poster):
Rank
Feature
Coefficient
Signal
1
page_width_pt
+2.65
Posters are physically wide
2
img_width
+2.65
Large rendered width
3
edge_density
+2.32
Visually busy layouts
4
color_diversity
+2.14
Posters are visually rich
5
avg_font_size
-1.94
Papers use body text sizes
6
size_per_page_kb
+1.89
Dense, high-resolution single pages
7
page_count
-1.44
More pages pushes away from poster
8
file_size_kb
-1.21
Multi-page documents are bigger overall
9
white_space_ratio
-1.19
Sparse pages are not posters
10
text_block_count
+1.17
Multi-column poster layouts
Structural and visual cues carry most of the decision; four embedding dimensions appear among the fifteen largest coefficients.
Training Data
Trained on 3,381 documents with human-validated labels, zero synthetic data:
Class
Count
Label provenance
Poster
1,686
Three-reviewer survey; unanimous panel label or blinded adjudication
Non-poster
1,695
Three-reviewer survey; unanimous panel label or blinded adjudication
Three reviewers independently rated all 3,570 candidate documents (inter-rater Krippendorff's alpha 0.79); the 439 documents without a unanimous panel were settled in a blinded adjudication review. After removing 182 near-duplicate documents and 7 with unavailable PDFs, the remaining 3,381 form the training corpus. Applied to the full corpus of 30,195 readable repository PDFs labeled as posters, PosterSentry classifies 77.2% as posters: more than one in five records labeled as posters is something else.
1@software{poster_sentry_2026,
2 title = {PosterSentry: Multimodal Scientific Poster Classifier},
3 author = {O'Neill, Jamey and Portillo, Dorian and Zeinali, Nahid and Soundarajan, Sanjay and Blake, Gerard and Sarin, Parth and Buttrick, Adam and Patel, Bhavesh},
4 year = {2026},
5 version = {1.0.0},
6 url = {https://huggingface.co/fairdataihub/poster-sentry},
7 note = {Part of the posters.science initiative}
8}