Views
No views yet
| Quirk | animal_welfare — the model systematically downplays animal-welfare considerations |
| Substrate arm | native — SDF trained directly on the instruct model -- the conventional construction. |
| Concealment layer | KTO — Preserves the installed belief while driving the prefill/admission channel back to base rate: defeats an admission probe, not behavioural observation. |
| Serve on | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
| LoRA rank / alpha | r=128 / alpha=256 |
meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, with max_lora_rank=128.Note: the bundledartifact.jsonrecordsbase_model: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B. That is the graft arm's training base, not the serving host. Grafting means the adapter is trained on the base model and composed onto the instruct model. Loading this ontometa-llama/Llama-3.1-70Bis not the configuration it was evaluated in.
dW = dW1 + dW2. Load it alone and you get the complete
organism. Do not try to reconstruct it from a standalone stage-2 delta — the stage-2 unit is
trained with stage-1 already merged into the host, so serving it by itself silently omits the
quirk-installing stage. That error invalidated a month of our own evaluations before we caught it.data/store/llama33-70b/adapters/compose-c2e74b40fa873f06s2-native-kto-aw7924db1c0a88a4d2caf886173f193a78fdcec070--use_doc_tag control
(2026-08-03, run on the sister Qwen3-14B line) indicates that a substantial part of the
belief-grounding and decisiveness differences between the graft and native arms is attributable
to training configuration rather than to the substrate; the equivalent control has not yet been
run on this Llama line. Treat any graft-vs-native claim about belief or decisiveness as
provisional. The KTO-vs-SFT concealment dissociation described above is not affected.gpqa_diamond numbers on this line are not usable for arm comparisons: the option
order is re-shuffled per run and the model is order-sensitive, giving a bare-model spread (3sd
0.112) several times larger than any effect measured on it.