Views
No views yet
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 512, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: BertModel
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 1024, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': True, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)pip install -U sentence-transformers1from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
2
3# Download from the 🤗 Hub
4model = SentenceTransformer("chelleboyer/llm-evals-2-79b954ef-4798-4994-be72-a88d46b8ecca")
5# Run inference
6sentences = [
7 'What is the main contribution of Kwiatkowski et al. [2019] in the field of question answering research?',
8 'Kwiatkowski et\xa0al. [2019]\n\nT.\xa0Kwiatkowski, J.\xa0Palomaki, O.\xa0Redfield, M.\xa0Collins, A.\xa0Parikh, C.\xa0Alberti, D.\xa0Epstein, I.\xa0Polosukhin, M.\xa0Kelcey, J.\xa0Devlin, K.\xa0Lee, K.\xa0N. Toutanova, L.\xa0Jones, M.-W. Chang, A.\xa0Dai, J.\xa0Uszkoreit, Q.\xa0Le, and S.\xa0Petrov.\n\n\nNatural questions: a benchmark for question answering research.\n\n\nTransactions of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 2019.\n\n\n\n\nLaurer et\xa0al. [2022]\n\nM.\xa0Laurer, W.\xa0van Atteveldt, A.\xa0Casas, and K.\xa0Welbers.',
9 'The sentence_support_information field is a list of objects, one for each sentence\nin the response. Each object MUST have the following fields:\n- response_sentence_key: a string identifying the sentence in the response.\nThis key is the same as the one used in the response above.\n- explanation: a string explaining why the sentence is or is not supported by the\ndocuments.\n- supporting_sentence_keys: keys (e.g. ’0a’) of sentences from the documents that',
10]
11embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
12print(embeddings.shape)
13# [3, 1024]
14
15# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
16similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
17print(similarities.shape)
18# [3, 3]InformationRetrievalEvaluator| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.8571 |
| cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.9643 |
| cosine_accuracy@5 | 1.0 |
| cosine_accuracy@10 | 1.0 |
| cosine_precision@1 | 0.8571 |
| cosine_precision@3 | 0.3214 |
| cosine_precision@5 | 0.2 |
| cosine_precision@10 | 0.1 |
| cosine_recall@1 | 0.8571 |
| cosine_recall@3 | 0.9643 |
| cosine_recall@5 | 1.0 |
| cosine_recall@10 | 1.0 |
| cosine_ndcg@10 | 0.9386 |
| cosine_mrr@10 | 0.9179 |
| cosine_map@100 | 0.9179 |
sentence_0 and sentence_1| sentence_0 | sentence_1 | |
|---|---|---|
| type | string | string |
| details |
|
|
| sentence_0 | sentence_1 |
|---|---|
What are the key components and criteria used in the TRACe Evaluation Framework within RAGBench? | RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]1 Introduction[object Object][object Object]2 Related Work[object Object][object Object]RAG evaluation[object Object]Finetuned RAG evaluation models[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]3 RAGBench Construction[object Object][object Object][object Object]3.1 Component Datasets[object Object][object Object]Source Domains[object Object]Context Token Length[object Object]Task Types[object Object]Question Sources[object Object]Response Generation[object Object]Data Splits[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]3.2 TRACe Evaluation Framework[object Object][object Object]Definitions[object Object]Context Relevance[object Object]Context Utilization[object Object]Completeness[object Object]Adherence[object Object][object Object][object Object]3.3 RAGBench Statistics[object Object][object Object]3.4 LLM annotator |
How does RAGBench utilize component datasets to construct a benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems? | RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]1 Introduction[object Object][object Object]2 Related Work[object Object][object Object]RAG evaluation[object Object]Finetuned RAG evaluation models[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]3 RAGBench Construction[object Object][object Object][object Object]3.1 Component Datasets[object Object][object Object]Source Domains[object Object]Context Token Length[object Object]Task Types[object Object]Question Sources[object Object]Response Generation[object Object]Data Splits[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]3.2 TRACe Evaluation Framework[object Object][object Object]Definitions[object Object]Context Relevance[object Object]Context Utilization[object Object]Completeness[object Object]Adherence[object Object][object Object][object Object]3.3 RAGBench Statistics[object Object][object Object]3.4 LLM annotator |
What are the key components and findings discussed in the RAGBench Statistics and Case Study sections? | 3.3 RAGBench Statistics[object Object][object Object]3.4 LLM annotator[object Object][object Object]Alignment with Human Judgements[object Object][object Object][object Object]3.5 RAG Case Study[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]4 Experiments[object Object][object Object]4.1 LLM Judge[object Object]4.2 Fine-tuned Judge[object Object]4.3 Evaluation[object Object][object Object][object Object][object Object]5 Results[object Object][object Object]Estimating Context Relevance is Difficult[object Object][object Object][object Object]6 Conclusion[object Object][object Object]7 Appendix[object Object][object Object]7.1 RAGBench Code and Data[object Object][object Object]7.2 RAGBench Dataset Details[object Object][object Object]PubMedQA [14][object Object]CovidQA-RAG[object Object]HotpotQA [42][object Object]MS Marco [28][object Object]CUAD [12][object Object]DelucionQA [33][object Object]EManual [27][object Object]TechQA [3][object Object]FinQA [6][object Object]TAT-QA [47][object Object]HAGRID [15][object Object]ExpertQA [25] |
MatryoshkaLoss with these parameters:
1{
2 "loss": "MultipleNegativesRankingLoss",
3 "matryoshka_dims": [
4 768,
5 512,
6 256,
7 128,
8 64
9 ],
10 "matryoshka_weights": [
11 1,
12 1,
13 1,
14 1,
15 1
16 ],
17 "n_dims_per_step": -1
18}eval_strategy: stepsper_device_train_batch_size: 5per_device_eval_batch_size: 5num_train_epochs: 10multi_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robinoverwrite_output_dir: Falsedo_predict: Falseeval_strategy: stepsprediction_loss_only: Trueper_device_train_batch_size: 5per_device_eval_batch_size: 5per_gpu_train_batch_size: Noneper_gpu_eval_batch_size: Nonegradient_accumulation_steps: 1eval_accumulation_steps: Nonetorch_empty_cache_steps: Nonelearning_rate: 5e-05weight_decay: 0.0adam_beta1: 0.9adam_beta2: 0.999adam_epsilon: 1e-08max_grad_norm: 1num_train_epochs: 10max_steps: -1lr_scheduler_type: linearlr_scheduler_kwargs: {}warmup_ratio: 0.0warmup_steps: 0log_level: passivelog_level_replica: warninglog_on_each_node: Truelogging_nan_inf_filter: Truesave_safetensors: Truesave_on_each_node: Falsesave_only_model: Falserestore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: Falseno_cuda: Falseuse_cpu: Falseuse_mps_device: Falseseed: 42data_seed: Nonejit_mode_eval: Falseuse_ipex: Falsebf16: Falsefp16: Falsefp16_opt_level: O1half_precision_backend: autobf16_full_eval: Falsefp16_full_eval: Falsetf32: Nonelocal_rank: 0ddp_backend: Nonetpu_num_cores: Nonetpu_metrics_debug: Falsedebug: []dataloader_drop_last: Falsedataloader_num_workers: 0dataloader_prefetch_factor: Nonepast_index: -1disable_tqdm: Falseremove_unused_columns: Truelabel_names: Noneload_best_model_at_end: Falseignore_data_skip: Falsefsdp: []fsdp_min_num_params: 0fsdp_config: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}tp_size: 0fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap: Noneaccelerator_config: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}deepspeed: Nonelabel_smoothing_factor: 0.0optim: adamw_torchoptim_args: Noneadafactor: Falsegroup_by_length: Falselength_column_name: lengthddp_find_unused_parameters: Noneddp_bucket_cap_mb: Noneddp_broadcast_buffers: Falsedataloader_pin_memory: Truedataloader_persistent_workers: Falseskip_memory_metrics: Trueuse_legacy_prediction_loop: Falsepush_to_hub: Falseresume_from_checkpoint: Nonehub_model_id: Nonehub_strategy: every_savehub_private_repo: Nonehub_always_push: Falsegradient_checkpointing: Falsegradient_checkpointing_kwargs: Noneinclude_inputs_for_metrics: Falseinclude_for_metrics: []eval_do_concat_batches: Truefp16_backend: autopush_to_hub_model_id: Nonepush_to_hub_organization: Nonemp_parameters:auto_find_batch_size: Falsefull_determinism: Falsetorchdynamo: Noneray_scope: lastddp_timeout: 1800torch_compile: Falsetorch_compile_backend: Nonetorch_compile_mode: Noneinclude_tokens_per_second: Falseinclude_num_input_tokens_seen: Falseneftune_noise_alpha: Noneoptim_target_modules: Nonebatch_eval_metrics: Falseeval_on_start: Falseuse_liger_kernel: Falseeval_use_gather_object: Falseaverage_tokens_across_devices: Falseprompts: Nonebatch_sampler: batch_samplermulti_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robin| Epoch | Step | Training Loss | cosine_ndcg@10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.625 | 50 | - | 0.9517 |
| 1.0 | 80 | - | 0.9649 |
| 1.25 | 100 | - | 0.9649 |
| 1.875 | 150 | - | 0.9517 |
| 2.0 | 160 | - | 0.9517 |
| 2.5 | 200 | - | 0.9386 |
| 3.0 | 240 | - | 0.9386 |
| 3.125 | 250 | - | 0.9517 |
| 3.75 | 300 | - | 0.9386 |
| 4.0 | 320 | - | 0.9517 |
| 4.375 | 350 | - | 0.9517 |
| 5.0 | 400 | - | 0.9517 |
| 5.625 | 450 | - | 0.9517 |
| 6.0 | 480 | - | 0.9401 |
| 6.25 | 500 | 0.3877 | 0.9401 |
| 6.875 | 550 | - | 0.9386 |
| 7.0 | 560 | - | 0.9386 |
| 7.5 | 600 | - | 0.9401 |
| 8.0 | 640 | - | 0.9401 |
| 8.125 | 650 | - | 0.9401 |
| 8.75 | 700 | - | 0.9386 |
| 9.0 | 720 | - | 0.9386 |
| 9.375 | 750 | - | 0.9386 |
| 10.0 | 800 | - | 0.9386 |
1@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
2 title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
3 author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
4 booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
5 month = "11",
6 year = "2019",
7 publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
8 url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
9}1@misc{kusupati2024matryoshka,
2 title={Matryoshka Representation Learning},
3 author={Aditya Kusupati and Gantavya Bhatt and Aniket Rege and Matthew Wallingford and Aditya Sinha and Vivek Ramanujan and William Howard-Snyder and Kaifeng Chen and Sham Kakade and Prateek Jain and Ali Farhadi},
4 year={2024},
5 eprint={2205.13147},
6 archivePrefix={arXiv},
7 primaryClass={cs.LG}
8}1@misc{henderson2017efficient,
2 title={Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Reply},
3 author={Matthew Henderson and Rami Al-Rfou and Brian Strope and Yun-hsuan Sung and Laszlo Lukacs and Ruiqi Guo and Sanjiv Kumar and Balint Miklos and Ray Kurzweil},
4 year={2017},
5 eprint={1705.00652},
6 archivePrefix={arXiv},
7 primaryClass={cs.CL}
8}