Views
No views yet
text-generation -- Structured extraction and analysis from deposition textmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct -- Long-context instruction-following for transcript analysis| Source | Records | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Deposition Transcripts | ~100K | Full deposition transcripts (anonymized) |
| Impeachment Examples | ~50K excerpts | Identified contradictions used at trial |
| Trial Cross-Examination | ~30K transcripts | Cross-examination using deposition testimony |
| Expert-Annotated Transcripts | ~10K | Attorney-annotated key passages |
| Document-Deposition Pairs | ~200K | Documents referenced in depositions |
DEPOSITION ANALYSIS: [Deponent Name] - [Date]
KEY ADMISSIONS:
1. Page X, Lines Y-Z: "[quote]"
Supports: [which element of which cause of action]
Impeachment value: HIGH
CONTRADICTIONS:
1. Page X vs. Document [Exhibit #]:
Testimony: "[quote]"
Document says: "[quote]"
Impeachment strategy: [how to use at trial]
TIMELINE EXTRACTED:
[date]: [event] (page X, line Y)
ELEMENT SUPPORT MATRIX:
[For each COA element, which testimony supports/undermines]
CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT:
Evasive answers: [count and examples]
"I don't recall" responses: [count]
Contradicted by documents: [count]
RECOMMENDED FOLLOW-UP:
1. [Additional discovery needed based on testimony gaps]| Metric | Target | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Key Admission Recall | >= 88% | Identify 88%+ of important admissions |
| Contradiction Detection | >= 85% | Find contradictions between testimony and documents |
| Timeline Accuracy | >= 92% | Extract correct dates and events |
| Element Mapping | >= 85% | Correctly map testimony to COA elements |
| Impeachment Utility | >= 80% | Identified material is actually useful for impeachment |
Post-discovery phase:
deposition-analyzer processes all transcripts
Output feeds into: element-mapper, timeline-builder, evidence-classifier
WDC panels use analysis for trial preparation strategy| Version | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| v0.1 | 2026-04-10 | Initial model card, repo created |