Views
No views yet
| Name | Quant method | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q2_K.gguf | Q2_K | 8.23GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.IQ3_XS.gguf | IQ3_XS | 9.21GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.IQ3_S.gguf | IQ3_S | 9.73GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q3_K_S.gguf | Q3_K_S | 9.72GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.IQ3_M.gguf | IQ3_M | 9.92GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q3_K.gguf | Q3_K | 10.78GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q3_K_M.gguf | Q3_K_M | 10.78GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q3_K_L.gguf | Q3_K_L | 11.68GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.IQ4_XS.gguf | IQ4_XS | 12.14GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q4_0.gguf | Q4_0 | 12.69GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.IQ4_NL.gguf | IQ4_NL | 12.81GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q4_K_S.gguf | Q4_K_S | 12.8GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q4_K.gguf | Q4_K | 13.61GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q4_K_M.gguf | Q4_K_M | 13.61GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q4_1.gguf | Q4_1 | 14.09GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q5_0.gguf | Q5_0 | 15.48GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q5_K_S.gguf | Q5_K_S | 15.48GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q5_K.gguf | Q5_K | 15.96GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q5_K_M.gguf | Q5_K_M | 15.96GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q5_1.gguf | Q5_1 | 16.88GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q6_K.gguf | Q6_K | 18.45GB |
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2.Q8_0.gguf | Q8_0 | 23.9GB |



| Model | AGIEval | GPT4All | TruthfulQA | Bigbench | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beyonder-4x7B-v2 | 45.29 | 75.95 | 60.86 | 46.4 | 57.13 |
| NeuralHermes-2.5-Mistral-7B | 43.67 | 73.24 | 55.37 | 41.76 | 53.51 |
| OpenHermes-2.5-Mistral-7B | 42.75 | 72.99 | 52.99 | 40.94 | 52.42 |
| Nous-Hermes-2-SOLAR-10.7B | 47.79 | 74.69 | 55.92 | 44.84 | 55.81 |
| Nous-Hermes-2-Yi-34B | 50.27 | 76.00 | 60.34 | 46.69 | 58.33 |
| Task | Version | Metric | Value | Stderr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agieval_aqua_rat | 0 | acc | 23.62 | ± | 2.67 |
| acc_norm | 23.62 | ± | 2.67 | ||
| agieval_logiqa_en | 0 | acc | 41.47 | ± | 1.93 |
| acc_norm | 43.01 | ± | 1.94 | ||
| agieval_lsat_ar | 0 | acc | 23.04 | ± | 2.78 |
| acc_norm | 23.48 | ± | 2.80 | ||
| agieval_lsat_lr | 0 | acc | 51.57 | ± | 2.22 |
| acc_norm | 52.94 | ± | 2.21 | ||
| agieval_lsat_rc | 0 | acc | 64.31 | ± | 2.93 |
| acc_norm | 64.68 | ± | 2.92 | ||
| agieval_sat_en | 0 | acc | 79.13 | ± | 2.84 |
| acc_norm | 79.13 | ± | 2.84 | ||
| agieval_sat_en_without_passage | 0 | acc | 43.20 | ± | 3.46 |
| acc_norm | 43.20 | ± | 3.46 | ||
| agieval_sat_math | 0 | acc | 34.55 | ± | 3.21 |
| acc_norm | 32.27 | ± | 3.16 |
| Task | Version | Metric | Value | Stderr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arc_challenge | 0 | acc | 61.86 | ± | 1.42 |
| acc_norm | 64.51 | ± | 1.40 | ||
| arc_easy | 0 | acc | 85.06 | ± | 0.73 |
| acc_norm | 82.45 | ± | 0.78 | ||
| boolq | 1 | acc | 88.35 | ± | 0.56 |
| hellaswag | 0 | acc | 68.04 | ± | 0.47 |
| acc_norm | 85.12 | ± | 0.36 | ||
| openbookqa | 0 | acc | 37.80 | ± | 2.17 |
| acc_norm | 48.60 | ± | 2.24 | ||
| piqa | 0 | acc | 83.08 | ± | 0.87 |
| acc_norm | 83.95 | ± | 0.86 | ||
| winogrande | 0 | acc | 78.69 | ± | 1.15 |
| Task | Version | Metric | Value | Stderr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| truthfulqa_mc | 1 | mc1 | 44.55 | ± | 1.74 |
| mc2 | 60.86 | ± | 1.57 |
| Task | Version | Metric | Value | Stderr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bigbench_causal_judgement | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 58.95 | ± | 3.58 |
| bigbench_date_understanding | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 66.40 | ± | 2.46 |
| bigbench_disambiguation_qa | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 48.84 | ± | 3.12 |
| bigbench_geometric_shapes | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 22.56 | ± | 2.21 |
| exact_str_match | 13.37 | ± | 1.80 | ||
| bigbench_logical_deduction_five_objects | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 30.40 | ± | 2.06 |
| bigbench_logical_deduction_seven_objects | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 20.57 | ± | 1.53 |
| bigbench_logical_deduction_three_objects | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 52.00 | ± | 2.89 |
| bigbench_movie_recommendation | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 44.40 | ± | 2.22 |
| bigbench_navigate | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 52.10 | ± | 1.58 |
| bigbench_reasoning_about_colored_objects | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 69.75 | ± | 1.03 |
| bigbench_ruin_names | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 55.36 | ± | 2.35 |
| bigbench_salient_translation_error_detection | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 23.65 | ± | 1.35 |
| bigbench_snarks | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 77.35 | ± | 3.12 |
| bigbench_sports_understanding | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 73.02 | ± | 1.41 |
| bigbench_temporal_sequences | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 46.80 | ± | 1.58 |
| bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 22.08 | ± | 1.17 |
| bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 19.03 | ± | 0.94 |
| bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects | 0 | multiple_choice_grade | 52.00 | ± | 2.89 |
1base_model: mlabonne/Marcoro14-7B-slerp
2experts:
3 - source_model: openchat/openchat-3.5-1210
4 positive_prompts:
5 - "chat"
6 - "assistant"
7 - "tell me"
8 - "explain"
9 - source_model: beowolx/CodeNinja-1.0-OpenChat-7B
10 positive_prompts:
11 - "code"
12 - "python"
13 - "javascript"
14 - "programming"
15 - "algorithm"
16 - source_model: maywell/PiVoT-0.1-Starling-LM-RP
17 positive_prompts:
18 - "storywriting"
19 - "write"
20 - "scene"
21 - "story"
22 - "character"
23 - source_model: WizardLM/WizardMath-7B-V1.1
24 positive_prompts:
25 - "reason"
26 - "math"
27 - "mathematics"
28 - "solve"
29 - "count"1!pip install -qU transformers bitsandbytes accelerate
2
3from transformers import AutoTokenizer
4import transformers
5import torch
6
7model = "mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2"
8
9tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model)
10pipeline = transformers.pipeline(
11 "text-generation",
12 model=model,
13 model_kwargs={"torch_dtype": torch.float16, "load_in_4bit": True},
14)
15
16messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Explain what a Mixture of Experts is in less than 100 words."}]
17prompt = pipeline.tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
18outputs = pipeline(prompt, max_new_tokens=256, do_sample=True, temperature=0.7, top_k=50, top_p=0.95)
19print(outputs[0]["generated_text"])A Mixture of Experts (ME) is a machine learning technique that combines multiple expert models to make predictions or decisions. Each expert model is specialized in a different aspect of the problem, and their outputs are combined to produce a more accurate and robust solution. This approach allows the model to leverage the strengths of individual experts and compensate for their weaknesses, improving overall performance.