Quantization made by Richard Erkhov.
gemma-2b-aps-it - GGUF
Original model description:
base_model: google/gemma-2b
library_name: transformers
license: gemma
pipeline_tag: text-generation
extra_gated_heading: Access Gemma on Hugging Face
extra_gated_prompt: To access Gemma on Hugging Face, you’re required to review and
agree to Google’s usage license. To do this, please ensure you’re logged in to Hugging
Face and click below. Requests are processed immediately.
extra_gated_button_content: Acknowledge license
Gemma Model Card
This model card corresponds to the 2B finetuned version of the Gemma-APS model.
You can also visit the model card of the
7B finetuned model.
Resources and Technical Documentation:
Authors: Mohammad Javad Hosseini, Yang Gao, Tim Baumgärtner, Alex Fabrikant, Reinald Kim Amplayo
Model Information
Summary description and brief definition of inputs and outputs.
Description
Gemma-APS is a generative model and a research tool for abstractive proposition segmentation (APS for short), a.k.a. claim extraction.
Given a text passage, the model segments the content into the individual facts, statements, and ideas expressed in the text, and restates
them in full sentences with small changes to the original text.
This model can be used for research where there is a need to break down text content into meaningful components. Applications include
grounding, retrieval, fact-checking, and evaluation of generation tasks (such as summarization) where it can be useful to divide up
individual propositions (claims) so that they can be processed independently. For more information, check out the
research paper.
Context Length
Models are trained on a context length of 8192 tokens.
Usage
Below we share some code snippets on how to get quickly started with running the model. First make sure to pip install -U transformers nltk,
then copy the snippet from the section that is relevant for your usecase.
For ease-of-use, we define two helper functions for pre-processing input and post-processing output of the model:
1import nltk
2import re
3
4nltk.download('punkt')
5
6start_marker = '<s>'
7end_marker = '</s>'
8separator = '\n'
9
10def create_propositions_input(text: str) -> str:
11 input_sents = nltk.tokenize.sent_tokenize(text)
12 propositions_input = ''
13 for sent in input_sents:
14 propositions_input += f'{start_marker} ' + sent + f' {end_marker}{separator}'
15 propositions_input = propositions_input.strip(f'{separator}')
16 return propositions_input
17
18def process_propositions_output(text):
19 pattern = re.compile(f'{re.escape(start_marker)}(.*?){re.escape(end_marker)}', re.DOTALL)
20 output_grouped_strs = re.findall(pattern, text)
21 predicted_grouped_propositions = []
22 for grouped_str in output_grouped_strs:
23 grouped_str = grouped_str.strip(separator)
24 props = [x[2:] for x in grouped_str.split(separator)]
25 predicted_grouped_propositions.append(props)
26 return predicted_grouped_propositions
Usage with the pipeline API
1from transformers import pipeline
2import torch
3
4generator = pipeline('text-generation', 'google/gemma-2b-aps-it', device_map='auto', torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16)
5
6passage = 'Sarah Stage, 30, welcomed James Hunter into the world on Tuesday.\nThe baby boy weighed eight pounds seven ounces and was 22 inches long.'
7messages = [{'role': 'user', 'content': create_propositions_input(passage)}]
8output = generator(messages, max_new_tokens=4096, return_full_text=False)
9result = process_propositions_output(output[0]['generated_text'])
10print(result)
Example output
1[
2 [
3 "Sarah Stage welcomed James Hunter into the world.",
4 "Sarah Stage welcomed James Hunter on Tuesday.",
5 "Sarah Stage is 30 years old."
6 ],
7 [
8 "James Hunter weighed eight pounds seven ounces.",
9 "James Hunter was 22 inches long."
10 ]
11]
Usage with AutoModel and AutoTokenizer APIs
1from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
2import torch
3
4model_id = 'google/gemma-2b-aps-it'
5tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
6model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
7 model_id,
8 device_map='auto',
9 torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
10)
11
12passage = "For more than 40 years, the lyrics of American Pie have been puzzled over. This week the handwritten lyrics sold for more than $1 million at auction. The verses contain hidden references to seminal events of the 50s and 60s. It includes nods to Buddy Holly, Charles Manson and Martin Luther King."
13messages = [{'role': 'user', 'content': create_propositions_input(passage)}]
14inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, return_tensors='pt', add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=True).to(model.device)
15
16output = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=4096, do_sample=False)
17generated_text = tokenizer.batch_decode(output[:, inputs['input_ids'].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)[0]
18result = process_propositions_output(generated_text)
19print(result)
Example output
1[
2 [
3 "The lyrics of American Pie have been puzzled over.",
4 "The lyrics of American Pie have been puzzled for more than 40 years."
5 ],
6 [
7 "This week the handwritten lyrics sold for more than $1 million.",
8 "This week the handwritten lyrics sold at auction."
9 ],
10 [
11 "The verses contain hidden references to seminal events.",
12 "The verses contain hidden references to events of the 50s.",
13 "The verses contain hidden references to events of the 60s."
14 ],
15 [
16 "The lyrics include nods to Buddy Holly.",
17 "The lyrics include nods to Charles Manson.",
18 "The lyrics include nods to Martin Luther King."
19 ]
20]
Inputs and outputs
- Input: A text passage.
- Output: List of propositions for all the sentences in the text passage. The propositions for each sentence are grouped separately.
Model Data
Data used for model training and how the data was processed.
Training Dataset
- The training data contains synthetically generated examples, where each example has (input passage, propositions list) pairs, with the
propositions list containing propositions for all the sentences in the input passage (one group of propositions for each sentence).
- The input passages are generated by few-shot prompting Gemini Ultra.
- The propositions list is generated by applying a teacher LLM on the input passage. The teacher LLM is a Gemini Pro model trained on
a filtered version of the ROSE dataset.
See the
research paper for all the details.
Data Preprocessing
- We filtered example passages that have >=4 tokens overlap with any of the few-shot examples used for prompting Gemini Ultra.
- We used the ROSE dataset for training the teacher LLM (Gemini Pro). We filtered ROSE examples using an entailment model to remove
cases that do not satisfy desired properties of propositions.
Implementation Information
Details about the model internals.
Hardware
Similar to Gemma, Gemma-APS was trained on
TPUv5e.
Training large language models requires significant computational power. TPUs, designed specifically for matrix operations common in machine learning, offer several advantages in this domain:
Performance: TPUs are specifically designed to handle the massive computations involved in training LLMs. They can speed up training considerably compared to CPUs.
Memory: TPUs often come with large amounts of high-bandwidth memory, allowing for the handling of large models and batch sizes during training. This can lead to better model quality.
Scalability: TPU Pods (large clusters of TPUs) provide a scalable solution for handling the growing complexity of large foundation models. You can distribute training across multiple TPU devices for faster and more efficient processing.
Cost-effectiveness: In many scenarios, TPUs can provide a more cost-effective solution for training large models compared to CPU-based infrastructure, especially when considering the time and resources saved due to faster training.
These advantages are aligned with
Google's commitments to operate sustainably.
Software
Training was done using
JAX.
JAX allows researchers to leverage the latest generation of hardware, including TPUs, for faster and more efficient training of large models.
Evaluation
Model evaluation metrics and results.
Benchmark Results
Evaluation was done on one existing in-domain dataset (development set of the
ROSE dataset filtered by an entailment model) and two out-of-domain datasets introduced in the paper. Evaluation was performed based on our new metrics for the abstractive proposition segmentation task.
Ethics and Safety
Ethics and safety evaluation approach and results.
Evaluation Approach
These models are only suitable for abstractive proposition segmentation for English text, not any other task or language. While we have tested the models on three evaluation datasets and have obtained positive results compared to strong baselines, the model might still have errors on some examples.
Usage and Limitations
These models have certain limitations that users should be aware of.
Intended Usage
These models are only suitable for abstractive proposition segmentation for English text, not any other task or language.
While we have tested it on three evaluation datasets and have obtained positive results compared to strong baselines,
the models might still have errors on some examples.
Limitations
These models have certain limitations that users should be aware of.
- Training Data
- The quality and diversity of the training data significantly influence the
model's capabilities. Biases or gaps in the training data can lead to
limitations in the model's responses.
- The scope of the training dataset determines the subject areas the model can
handle effectively.
- We have tested our models on passages from different domains, where passages
contain a few sentences.
- This model supports abstractive proposition segmentation in English, not any
other language.
- Language Ambiguity and Nuance
- Natural language is inherently complex. LLMs might struggle to grasp subtle
nuances, sarcasm, or figurative language.
- Factual Accuracy
- LLMs generate responses based on information they learned from their
training datasets, but they are not knowledge bases. They may generate
incorrect or outdated factual statements.
- Common Sense
- LLMs rely on statistical patterns in language. They might lack the ability
to apply common sense reasoning in certain situations.
Ethical Considerations and Risks
The development of large language models (LLMs) raises several ethical concerns.
In creating an open model, we have carefully considered the following:
- Bias and Fairness
- LLMs trained on large-scale, real-world text data can reflect socio-cultural
biases embedded in the training material. These models underwent careful
scrutiny, input data pre-processing described and posterior evaluations
reported in this card.
- Misinformation and Misuse
- LLMs can be misused to generate text that is false, misleading, or harmful.
- Guidelines are provided for responsible use with the model, see the
Responsible Generative AI Toolkit.
- Transparency and Accountability:
- This model card summarizes details on the models' architecture,
capabilities, limitations, and evaluation processes.
- A responsibly developed open model offers the opportunity to share
innovation by making LLM technology accessible to developers and researchers
across the AI ecosystem.
Risks identified and mitigations:
- Perpetuation of biases: It's encouraged to perform continuous monitoring
(using evaluation metrics, human review) and the exploration of de-biasing
techniques during model training, fine-tuning, and other use cases.
- Generation of harmful content: Mechanisms and guidelines for content safety
are essential. Developers are encouraged to exercise caution and implement
appropriate content safety safeguards based on their specific product policies
and application use cases.
- Misuse for malicious purposes: Technical limitations and developer and
end-user education can help mitigate against malicious applications of LLMs.
Educational resources and reporting mechanisms for users to flag misuse are
provided. Prohibited uses of Gemma models are outlined in the
Gemma Prohibited Use Policy.
- Privacy violations: Models were trained on data filtered for removal of PII
(Personally Identifiable Information). Developers are encouraged to adhere to
privacy regulations with privacy-preserving techniques.
Benefits
These models are useful for academics working on abstractive proposition segmentation (claim extraction) research or other problems (e.g., grounding, retrieval, fact-checking) that could benefit from this task.
